Toyota recall copy 1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Academy of Business Computers (Karimabad), Karachi *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
20
Subject
Business
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by ProfessorRain9773
Management of Business Operations
Key strategic and operational dimensions that led to the failure of your chosen car
manufacturer to be forced to recall their car model(s) using the PDCA tool.
Introduction
Quality control measures are more important in today's technologically advanced and
competitive marketplace. Consumers are prepared to spend money on items if they meet their
needs in terms of quality, safety, cost, and return on investment. Toyota has been a major player
in the auto business for a long time, and for good reason: they provide reliable vehicles at
affordable prices. Toyota has had a high bar to maintain because of its brand and standing in the
business. But during the past decade, Toyota has struggled with leadership, consistency, &
ethical difficulties, all of which have contributed to internal contradictions. Among the
discrepancies were recalls for issues including faulty steering, sudden acceleration, broken
brakes, and faulty software. There was a risk to clients' safety because of these flaws.
Consumers' worries and the resulting crisis harmed Toyota's brand for years.
Discussion
About Toyota Motor Corporation.
In Toyota's early years, the firm formed a set of core values and principles that set it apart from
competitors. "The Toyota Way" was the company's guiding ideology, and it emphasised things
like cooperation, problem-solving, respect, and mentorship. These tenets seemed to contribute to
the firm's long-term success and distinctive accomplishments. In 2005, Chris Pitrowski said that
Toyota was the eighth best company in the world on Forbes' 2000 ranking of the most successful
businesses in the world. Toyota was number five on the list of the world's largest corporations in
2008 (Pritrowski et al., 2010). Furthermore, in 2008, Toyota had the highest sales of any
automaker in the world. In addition, Toyota sold almost 7.5 million automobiles under all of its
brands (Lexus, Toyota, Hino, Scion, and Daihatsu) in 170 countries. Toyota overcame adversity
to accomplish all this, but the corporation is not immune to crises.
Background Accelerator issues caused Toyota to recall over eight million cars across many models between
2009 and early 2010. A poorly fitted floor mat that trapped the accelerator was a contributing
factor. The second factor was a defective pedal, which was traced back to a universal component
made by a single manufacturer (CTS) but utilised in a wide variety of variants. Another theory
that turned out to be false concerned the electromagnetic components of the pedals. The National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) conducted an exhaustive examination and
found that the floor mat & sticky accelerator issues were responsible for surprisingly few
incidents. Most cases of unexpected acceleration were the result of human mistake rather than
mechanical failure. It's also worth noting that several experts have said that despite the
magnitude of the Toyota recall, it wasn't the biggest in history. It also had few deaths and a
statistically insignificant number of injuries, making it hard for management to see trends.
Despite the recalls, Toyota continued to deal with a negative public image. Toyota saw a big loss
in stock price as media outlets painted the company as a villain that didn't care about consumer
safety. They had to take immediate action to restore their honour and the respect they had earned
over the years.
Recall Crises Toyota vehicles have been the subject of several defect reports in 2009. After a fatal crash
involving a Lexus in San Diego made international headlines, Toyota finally issued a recall. A
family of four perished after their Lexus skidded out of control, collided with another vehicle,
and caught fire. As soon as they said they'd uncovered the issue, Toyota recalled 3.8 million
vehicles (Searcey, 2010). Evidently weatherproof floor mats were pressing down on the gas
pedal (Searcey, 2010). The thick plastic construction of the weather-proof floor mats may have
seized on the accelerator (Searcey, 2010). The engine and the gas pedal were both under
suspicion for having flaws. There were claims that "sticky gas pedals" were to blame for
automobiles speeding up unexpectedly (Kageyama, 2012). On January 28, 2010, Toyota issued a
recall for about 5.2 million cars due to defective floor mats, 2.3 million due to a fault with the
accelerator pedal, and approximately 1.7 million due to both issues (Kageyama, 2012). Other
accidents and incidents involving speeding Toyota automobiles, in which drivers claimed floor
mats weren't the cause, went unnoticed, though. Some motorists reported that even though their
vehicles lacked floor mats, they nevertheless experienced sudden and unexplained acceleration
(Searcy, 2010). It was also forgotten that most current gas pedals don't really release gas into the
engine but instead transmit a signal to the vehicle's onboard computer (Searcy, 2010). In
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
layman's terms: the connection between the accelerator and the motor had broken. Toyota's
reaction to these instances was to suggest that the fault lay with the vehicles' drivers. From
Toyota's vantage point, motorists were pressing down on the accelerator instead of the brake.
Safety Research & Strategies Incorporated claims that after 2002, when Toyota switched to a
fully computerised and wired system (Andrews et al, 2011), the number of complaints against
Toyota automobiles skyrocketed. It was once believed that computer bugs were to blame for the
sudden acceleration issues some vehicles experienced. NHTSA conducted six independent
investigations into reported occurrences of sudden acceleration in Toyota vehicles but found no
flaws in the company's electronics (Andrews et al., 2011). Toyota said that the fault might have
been the brakes when customers brought their vehicles in for examination after having similar
events (Searcy, 2010). It was completely illogical to assume that shaky brakes might force a
vehicle to pick up speed.
Recall Effects on Toyota The constant recalls tarnished Toyota's reputation for reliability. Media coverage of tragic events
in 2009 influenced how viewers and readers interpreted such events. The company's reputation
for producing high-quality vehicles suffered as a consequence. According to a nationwide poll
conducted by Gallup in 2010, 31% of Americans believed Toyota cars to be risky, according to
Robert Cole's research. Car quality authority J.D. Power and Associates found that Toyota's
autos have declined in quality in recent years (Cole, 2011). Initial Quality Study takes a poll 90
days after automobile buyers have taken possession. Prior to the recalls in 2009, Toyota was
vying for first place among mass-market manufacturers with Mercedes-Benz (Cole, 2011). But
in 2010, poll results painted a different picture. According to research conducted by Cole (2011),
Toyota & its other brands have fallen behind rivals such as Porsche, Acura, and Mercedes-Benz.
Underneath the problem
Toyota had a respectable amount of flexibility before buyers began to devalue their goods,
thanks to the company's previously stellar reputation. Despite repeated concerns about
automobile defects, Toyota has consistently failed to make any changes to the way it does
business. The goal of risk management is to identify potential dangers as soon as possible and
take corrective action while the threat is still small. Toyota's upper management has been
forewarned about the company's irregularities on many occasions. For instance, Toyota
disbanded its high-level task force in 2005 (Andrews 2011) to deal with quality difficulties, but
this was before the large recalls in early 2009. A Toyota manager explained the company's
decision by stating that upper management now has faith in the quality control department and
doesn't see the need for a dedicated committee (Andrews, 2011). In addition, Toyota's U.S. vice
president of technical and regulatory affairs, Chris Tinto, notified the other business's
management that "some of the quality issues are showing up in defect investigations" in January
2008. Politically prominent leaders, who were overconfident in the company's renown, ignored
and downplayed early warnings from lower-ranking executives.
Growing Too Fast Rapid expansion inside an organisation could seem to be a positive sign at first. However,
Toyota was a prime illustration of how a corporation that expanded too rapidly risked losing
sight of its original purpose. According to Cole's research, "between 2002 and 2008, Toyota's
overseas production facilities expanded from 37 to 53," and "global sales rose by an average of
9% per year" (Cole, 2011). In order to meet the deadline, they had to sacrifice quality in their
production processes. Toyota's "key decisions affecting product development, supplier
management, and production became biassed in favour of meeting sales, delivery, cost-cutting,
and profit targets" (Cole, 2011) as a result of this momentum. The changes were gradual, but
taken together, they meant that the automobiles were of worse quality than before. There's also
the fact that automotive technology was advancing at the time. Toyota has to be careful about
making choices that may affect quality control while yet keeping retail costs low and staying up
with technology.
Toyota recalls analysis using PDCA
TBP is Toyota's 8-step problem-solving method, which is based on the 4-step PDCA paradigm
but is more thorough and prescriptive. Toyota sought to implement the ideas they had established
in The Toyota Way 2001 across the company and with its external partners and suppliers.
Here are the 8 measures:
Clarify the problem
Breakdown the problem
Set a target
Analyze the root cause
Develop countermeasures
See countermeasures through
Evaluate both results and process
Standardize successful processes
Analysis No reports have surfaced of any technological malfunctions in Toyota automobiles leading to
unexpected bursts of speed. Sticky gas pedals and poorly fitted floor mats were the only factors
NASA could identify as potential causes. Accidents caused by the floor mats are extremely rare,
with only one case on record (involving a loaner Lexus) due to the dealer's use of the incorrect
floor mat and the improper attachment of the restraining clips. The majority of collisions are the
result of careless driving.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Result
Toyota initially struggled to respond to reports of unintended acceleration. Toyota personnel
responded to the complaints in ways that baffled marketing and crisis management professionals,
rather than saying they are examining the allegations and would provide a thorough report at the
completion of their inquiry. They muddled the issue by making hasty assumptions and offering
competing explanations. The first thing they did was blame the driver, as that's the most common
cause of auto self-acceleration difficulties (and the reason Audi almost went out of business in
the US in the '80s).
Then, Toyota speculated that the floor mats were to blame for keeping the gas pedal from
moving freely. It was "sticky" gas pedals, according to several engineers. The subsequent
hypothesis proposed that malfunctioning electronics were to blame for the unexpected speed
boost. Toyota failed to reassure the public, leading some owners to worry about their safety and
potential purchasers to consider other brands. On the Today show, Toyota Motor Sales, USA
president and CEO Jim Lentz seemed "deer in the headlights" in reaction to host Matt Lauer's
questioning. Pre-Lentz polling found that 37% of respondents were less inclined to shop for a
Toyota after hearing him speak. After he finished talking, the percentage of naysayers soared to
56%. Toyota and its dealership network lost even more money offering deep discounts and
carrying out the recalls when the uncertainty they sowed led to a slew of expensive recalls,
litigation, and lost business.
Action Plan
Toyota lost billions of dollars in value due to a crisis that forced the company to ponder deeply
and make significant adjustments to become more responsive to consumer concerns.
Made a suggestion for fixing the problem so it won't happen again
Providing a significant amount of reliable, third-party information
Producing advertising in support of established quality and security
Reaching out to each and every one of our clients
Facilitating better communication with competing businesses
Make a log of problems and fixes and keep an eye on it.
Streamline methods of consumer interaction using modern technologies.
Restore trust among your clientele.
Toyota’s Reaction These details, which ultimately cleared Toyota of responsibility, did not emerge until much later.
Accordingly, Toyota should have prioritised and improved upon its response to consumer
concerns and recalls. They took too long to realise there was a problem and issue a recall. Toyota
persisted in selling the automobiles despite knowing there was an issue, so the NHTSA
intervened to halt the sales. One explanation is that the issue was not immediately identifiable.
However, they went against their own fifth principle by keeping the flawed items on the market
rather than promptly ceasing production and finding a solution. The new president, Akio Toyoda,
did not publicly address the issue until February 2010, when he spoke before a legislative
oversight body. He said he was sorry he hadn't been able to manage things better. He blamed the
company's centralised decision making structure, saying that it allowed for ineffective and
uninformed decision making by Japanese management who were not necessarily well-versed in
the issue at hand. Since then, he's also made a number of significant changes in leadership. This
goes back to rule #13: make choices carefully by agreement, examining all possibilities
extensively, then execute them promptly, thus he downsized the board of directors and instituted
a small, weekly advisers meeting instead. When they allowed bureaucracy and
internationalisation to stand in the way of making well-informed decisions, they were violating
this concept as well. As a result, Toyoda cut down on the number of managers in place and
established the Automotive Centre of Quality Excellence to ensure that all communications
followed the most effective routes possible. By constantly putting his own Toyota through its
paces, he has convinced the automaker to improve its products. Toyoda wants Toyota to stop
thinking of automobiles as just commodities and start seeing them as "emotional" investments.
Concluding and Recommendations Companies in the industrial sector can no longer afford to be careless when it comes to quality
assurance. Overconfidence might lead to issues inside the organisation, despite its solid status in
the market for years giving the sense of comfort. Taking even one bad action may have a
devastating effect on a company's standing and image. Toyota's management has made several
irresponsible mistakes that have reduced the quality of its vehicles. Toyota received several
reports of problems and responded until the media publicised the issue. Accidents occurred
despite several inquiries into the causes, but the company's leadership, consistency, and ethics
were at the heart of the issue. To avoid this, businesses should revisit choices with many leaders
before moving forward. The board should hear about risks from the risk management team so
they can consider countermeasures. In addition, businesses should respond rapidly to dangers to
prevent them from growing into more serious issues. When things are going well for a firm, it's
crucial for top management to pause and consider whether or not they are continuing to pursue
their original goals.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e9bb/2e9bbbd7d09f130468a4890571905b1489fbc4ad" alt="Text book image"
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033791
Author:Pride, William M
Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing
Recommended textbooks for you
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e9bb/2e9bbbd7d09f130468a4890571905b1489fbc4ad" alt="Text book image"
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033791
Author:Pride, William M
Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing