Bio 102 Lab Report 1 - Mohamed Aboseria (2)

pdf

School

The City College of New York, CUNY *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

102

Subject

Biology

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

10

Uploaded by Habibaabdelfattah

Report
1 The Effect of Common Household Drugs on Circulatory Functions in Lumbriculus variegatus Mohamed Aboseria City College of New York Biology 102 Lab, Section 2PS2 Instructor: James Bell March 29, 2022
2 Introduction Black Worms, or Lumbriculus variegatus, are mainly found throughout North America and Europe and mostly live by ponds or lakes. They feed on dying leaves and wood, or other small organisms such as bacteria. Black worms are mainly known for their closed circulatory system in which the blood is circulated throughout the body by rhythmic muscle contractions of the ventral and dorsal blood vessels. This closed circulatory system allows black worms to circulate blood throughout their body in a stable manner without the need of a heart. Recent research tested the effect of common household drugs, like nicotine and caffeine, on the pulsation rate or heart rate of animals and insects. A recent study demonstrated that nicotine and black tea can significantly increase heart rate in rats (Joukar & Sheibani, 2017). This suggests that nicotine and black tea can have a similar effect on the pulsation rate of black worms. Another study shows that different concentrations of caffeine decreased the heart rate of zebrafish embryos at different levels (Moond et al., 2010). Other research aimed to test the effect of caffeine and nicotine on daphnia magna, a parasite commonly used for academic experiments. This research illustrated that nicotine significantly increased the heart rate and caffeine had no significant effect (Corotto et al., 2010). According to the research mentioned above, the effects of nicotine, caffeine, or other common household drugs, vary depending on the species used for the experiment. This experiment aims to test the effects of common household drugs on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus. Based on recent studies on the effects of common household drugs on the heart rate/pulsation rate of different species, the first experimental hypothesis is as follows: Different concentrations of caffeine and nicotine will have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus. The null hypothesis for this experiment is: different
3 concentrations of caffeine and nicotine will not have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus . The second experimental hypothesis is: Other common household drugs, like coffee and green tea, will have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus . The null hypothesis for this experiment is: Other common household drugs, like coffee and green tea, will not have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus. Materials & Methods To carry out the experiment, a parafilm slide viewing chamber and a dissecting microscope were obtained. Using a disposable plastic pipette, a worm was carefully transferred to the viewing chamber and excess water was removed. The worm in the viewing chamber was then given a few minutes to adjust to its new environment and it was then placed under the dissecting microscope for examination. To adjust the positioning of the worm on the viewing chamber, applicator sticks were used to move the worms in a careful controlled manner. The dissecting microscope was then adjusted and focused on the middle region of the worm to measure the pulsation rate. A stopwatch was used to obtain a basal rate 3 times before treatment and 3 times after treatment per worm. 3 worms were used per treatment. To remove the worm after its basal rate was measured, more water was added on the viewing chamber and a plastic pipette was used. To avoid contamination, a different pipette was used for each worm and each treatment. To measure the basal rate for the treatments, the worm was transferred from water to the treatment and allowed to sit in the solution for 15 minutes then transferred back to the viewing chamber and examined. Steps were repeated for each worm to measure the basal rates before and after treatments.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 Results Table 1 below demonstrates the mean change, standard deviation, standard error, and the 95% confidence interval for 3 different concentrations of nicotine in comparison to water (the control). The mean change for water is -0.14 and the mean change for nicotine decreases as the concentration increases from 0.05 mM to 0.25 mM. At 1.0 mM concentration of nicotine, a surprising mean of 1.28 is presented. This may illustrate that at higher concentrations of nicotine, the pulsation rate increases. Table 1: Statistical data of the effect of different concentrations of Nicotine on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . Treatment Mean Change SD Standard Error 95% Confidence interval Water -0.14 2.34 0.96 1.88 Nicotine 0.05 mM -0.11 5.68 1.52 2.98 Nicotine 0.25 mM -0.97 4.01 1.21 2.37 Nicotine 1.0 mM 1.28 7.28 2.10 4.12 Figure 1: Mean changes (bars) and the standard deviations (error bars) of the effect of different Nicotine concentrations on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus. -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Water Nicotine 0.05mM Nicotine 0.25mM Nicotine 1.0mM Mean Change in Pulsation Rate (beats/min) Treatment
5 Figure 1 above demonstrates the mean change (bars) and standard deviations (error bars) for the 3 different concentrations of nicotine in comparison with water. The standard deviation values are large, meaning that multiple, individually measured, pulsation rate differences were far away from the mean. Table 2: Statistical analysis of the effect of 1.0 mM Nicotine concentration in comparison with water on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . t-calculated 0.4590 t-critical for 95% confidence level 2.12 D.F 16 Confidence level < 75% p-value 0.548649727 Table 2 showcases the t-calculated for water and 1.0 mM concentration of nicotine in comparison to their t-critical. The t-calculated is significantly smaller than the t-critical leading to a confidence level of less than 75%. On the other hand, table 3 below shows the same statistics for different concentrations of caffeine in comparison with water. The mean change for water is the same value of -0.14 and the mean change for caffeine increased significantly as the concentration increased. As the concentration of the caffeine increased, an increase in the standard deviation was also noticeable suggesting the presence of more values scattered away from the mean. Table 3: Statistical data of the effect of different concentrations of Caffeine on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . Treatment Mean Change SD Standard Error 95% Confidence interval Water -0.14 2.34 0.96 1.88 Caffeine 1.0 mM 2.63 2.47 0.82 1.61 Caffeine 3.0 mM 7.2 3.67 1.06 2.08 Caffeine 10.0 mM 8.82 4.91 1.64 3.21
6 Figure 2: Mean changes (bars) and the standard deviations (error bars) of the effect of different Caffeine concentrations on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . As shown In Figure 2, Caffeine at 10.0 mM has the highest effect on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus. In increases it significantly with a mean change of 8.82. The difference between the effect of water and the 3 different concentrations of caffeine is visible in figure 2 with the effect of water having a mean change of -0.14 and the effects of the different concentrations of caffeine ranging from 2.63 to 8.82. Table 4 shows the t-calculated for water and 10.0 mM of caffeine in comparison with their t-critical value. The t-calculated is significantly higher than the t-critical leading to a confidence level of less than 0.9995% at a p- value of 0.00048. Table 4: Statistical analysis of the effect of 10.0 mM Caffeine concentration in comparison with water on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . t-calculated 4.1277 t-critical for 95% confidence level 2.16 D.F 13 Confidence level < 9995% p-value 0.000478706 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Water Caffeine 1.0 mM Caffeine 3.0 mM Caffeine 10.0 mM Mean Change in Pulsation Rate (beats/min) Treatment
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
7 Table 5: Statistical data of the effect of other common household drugs on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . Treatment Mean Change SD Standard Error 95% Confidence Interval Water -0.14 2.34 0.96 1.88 Green Tea 3.2 1.04 0.47 0.92 Instant Coffee 3.44 1.68 0.97 1.90 Coffee 10.3 9.5 3.17 6.21 Decaf 2 1.25 0.51 0.99 Tobacco 3.61 14.68 5.99 11.74 Decaf Tea 1.33 0.58 0.33 0.65 Table 5 above shows the same statistical data for the effect of common household drug extracts on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus in comparison with water. Clearly, as shown in table 5 and figure 3, coffee has the highest effect with a mean change of 10.3. It significantly increases the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus. Figure 3: Mean changes (bars) and the standard deviations (error bars) of the effect of other common household drugs on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Water Green Tea Instant Coffee Coffee Decaf Tobacco Decaf Tea Mean Change in Pulsation Rate (beats/min) Treatment
8 Table 6 below shows that the t-calculated for coffee and water in comparison with the t- critical. The t-calculated came out to be higher in value leading to a confidence level of less than 99% with a p-value of 0.01102. Table 6: Statistical analysis of the effect of Coffee in comparison with water on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus . t-calculated 2.6091 t-critical for 95% confidence level 2.16 D.F 13 Confidence level <99% p-value 0.01101607 Discussion & Conclusion The goal for this experiment was to test the effect of different concentrations of caffeine and nicotine as well as extracts from common household drugs on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus. The first experimental hypothesis was: Different concentrations of caffeine and nicotine will have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus. The null hypothesis for this experiment was: different concentrations of caffeine and nicotine will not have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus . The second experimental hypothesis was: Other common household drugs, like coffee and green tea, will have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus . The null hypothesis for this experiment was: Other common household drugs, like coffee and green tea, will not have a significant effect on the pulsation rate of Lumbriculus variegatus. The results for different concentrations of nicotine demonstrated that nicotine does not have a significant effect on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus with a t-test value of 0.4590. Even though at 1.0 mM concentration of nicotine, it showed a mean change value of 1.28, it can not be safely stated
9 that we fail to reject the null hypothesis due to this value inconsistency with the other values at concentrations 0.05 mM and 0.25 mM. For caffeine, the null hypothesis was rejected and a clear significant effect on the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus was shown with a t-test value of 4.1277 at a confidence level of less than 0.9995%. The results show that the higher the concentration of caffeine, the higher the pulsation rate in Lumbriculus variegatus. For the other common household drugs, the null hypothesis was also rejected, and a significant effect was shown for the highest mean change value of 10.3 for coffee. Overall, unexpected results were shown for nicotine could be due to multiple errors such as contamination or not giving the black worms enough time to get used to their new environment on the viewing chamber. Other errors could have been using the same plastic pipette for different worms or solutions. Many factors, such as variance in environmental conditions for the worm could have caused a change in its pulsation rate. Not correctly timing or having different people count the pulsation rates could have also led to inconsistent results. Going forward, I would replicate this experiment 3 times making sure to maintain consistency throughout the experiment
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
10 References “Circulatory Function: The Effect of Common Household Drugs on Pulsation Rate of Blackworms.” Laboratory Manual for Biological Foundations II BIO 10200 , Spring 2022 ed., Department of Biology City College of New York, New York, NY, 2022, pp. 85 91. Joukar, & Sheibani, M. (2017). Combinatorial effect of nicotine and black tea on heart rate variability: Useful or harmful? Autonomic & Autacoid Pharmacology , 37 (3), 44 48. Rana, Moond, M., Marthi, A., Bapatla, S., Sarvepalli, T., Chatti, K., & Challa, A. K. (2010). Caffeine-induced effects on heart rate in zebrafish embryos and possible mechanisms of action: an effective system for experiments in chemical biology. Zebrafish , 7 (1), 69 81. Corotto, Ceballos, D., Lee, A., & Vinson, L. (2010). Making the Most of the Daphnia Heart Rate Lab: Optimizing the Use of Ethanol, Nicotine & Caffeine. The American Biology Teacher , 72 (3), 176 179.