GMO Crops on the African Continent

docx

School

University of the People *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1503

Subject

Biology

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by JudgeBravery3423

GMO Crops on the African Continent After reading through the following article: Deressa, T., Pugliese, J., & Kimenyi, M.S. (2014) . Genetically engineered crops: Key to climate adaptation and food security in Africa. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2014/09/04/ genetically-engineered-crops-key-to-climate-adaptation-and-food- security-in-africa/ Choose a side, either for or against GMO in Africa. FOR 1. List the reasons why and how GMO would benefit the African continent. 2. Explain how the possible negative impacts of GMO, could be turned into a positive (if any). 3. Describe one country in Africa that you think would most benefit from harvesting GMO products. AGAINST 1. List the reasons why and how GMO would weaken the African continent. 2. Explain how the possible positive impacts of GMO, could quickly turn into a negative impact (if any). 3. Describe one country in Africa that you think would least benefit from harvesting GMO products. Remember to choose only one position , either for or against. Please make sure your assignment is double-spaced using Times New Roman, 12-point font, and 1” margins. Be sure to cite any references in APA Format. Each paper will be assessed on the following:  All questions are answered  Strong examples, valid points, and ideas on the topic  At least two additional resources cited in APA format  2-3 pages in length  Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation  Do not include your name on your paper this will help ensure fairness in grading.

Coltivazioni OGM nel continente africano Dopo aver letto il seguente articolo: Deressa, T., Pugliese, J., & Kimenyi, M.S. (2014). Colture geneticamente modificate: chiave per l'adattamento climatico e la sicurezza alimentare in Africa. Brooking Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2014/09/04/genetically-engineered-crops-key-to- climate-adaptation-and-food-security-in-africa/ Scegli da che parte stare, a favore o contro gli OGM in Africa. PER Elenca i motivi per cui e in che modo gli OGM andrebbero a beneficio del continente africano. Spiega come i possibili impatti negativi degli OGM potrebbero essere trasformati in positivi (se ce ne sono). Descrivi un paese in Africa che secondo te trarrebbe i maggiori benefici dalla raccolta di prodotti OGM. CONTRO Elenca i motivi per cui e come gli OGM indebolirebbero il continente africano. Spiega come i possibili impatti positivi degli OGM potrebbero rapidamente trasformarsi in un impatto negativo (se ce ne sono). Descrivi un paese in Africa che secondo te trarrebbe i minori benefici dalla raccolta di prodotti OGM. Ricorda di scegliere solo una posizione, a favore o contro. Assicurati che il tuo compito sia a spaziatura doppia utilizzando Times New Roman, carattere 12 punti e margini di 1 pollice. Assicurati di citare eventuali riferimenti in formato APA. Ogni elaborato sarà valutato in base a quanto segue: Tutte le domande trovano risposta Esempi forti, punti validi e idee sull'argomento Almeno due risorse aggiuntive citate in formato APA 2-3 pagine di lunghezza Grammatica, ortografia e punteggiatura corrette Non includere il tuo nome sulla tua carta questo contribuirà a garantire l'equità nella valutazione. Films Media Group. (2012). Introduction to Vandana Shiva . [Video]. Films on Demand. https://fod.infobase.com/p_ViewPlaylist.aspx? AssignmentID=U9SA5J https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG17oEsQiEw

Pag. 191 environmental book CONCERNS ABOUT GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS The complexity of ecological systems presents considerable challenges for experiments to assess the risks and benefits and inevitable uncertainties of GMOs (Maghari & Ardekani, 2011). Assessing such risks is extremely difficult, because both natural and human-modified systems are highly complex, and fraught with uncertainties that may not be clarified until long after an experimental introduction has been concluded. Critics of GMOs warn that the cultivation of GMOs, with their potential benefits and hazards to the environment, should be carefully considered within broader ecosystems. Interbreeding with native species. When the genetically modified organisms are allowed to breed with the organisms which are not genetically engineered, then these organisms may affect the genetic of non- genetically engineered organisms. Due to this reason the whole ecological system might get affected. The main concern is that genetically modified organisms might lead the non-GM organisms to extinction and reduce biodiversity. GM food labeling. In order to verify whether people have been harmed over the years by consuming GMF, specifically in countries like the US where people’s dietary are mainly composed of such products, the law for mandatory labeling is highly required. However, the labeling is not just about health issue rather, it is about consumer rights to make an informed choice. Although a consensual system on GMO labeling is crucial, it seems unlikely that an internationally agreed labeling system can be set up in proximate future. Nevertheless, different GMO labeling schemes have been established in different countries, ranging from stringent to extremely lenient or even non existent legislations. While the EU has established strict labeling regulations, in the US, Canada and Argentina, three big producers of GMO food, such laws have been put forward but not enacted by these governments. A proper labeling represents the “GM” word, along with additional information on changed characteristics and the external source of the inserted gene. Negative labeling such as “GM free” is not suggested, because it might give the wrong impression to the consumers. The law for compulsory labeling of genetically modified food products has been established in more than 40 countries. Surveys commissioned by different organizations have shown that people across the world

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

are seeking for transparency and consumer choice and believe that compulsory labeling scheme on GM ingredients is highly required: 88% Canadians, 92% Americans and 93% French. Consumers right to choose. The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movement has made stringent efforts to keep GMOs out of organic production, yet some US organic farmers have found their corn (maize) crops, including seeds, to contain detectable levels of genetically engineered DNA (Godheja, 2013). The organic movement is firm in its opposition to any use of GMOs in agriculture, and organic standards explicitly prohibit their use. The farmers, whose seed is contaminated, have been under rigid organic certification, which assures that they did not use any kind of genetically modified materials on their farms. Any trace of GMOs must have come from outside their production areas. While the exact origin is unclear at this time, it is most likely that the pollution has been caused by pollen drift from GMO-fields in surrounding areas. However, the contamination may have also come from the seed supply. Seed producers, who intended to supply GMO-free seed, have also been confronted with genetic contamination and cannot guarantee that their seed is 100% GMO-free. Ecological long-term effects. The Bt corn produces wind-borne pollen that kills the caterpillars of the Monarch butterfly. If the life cycles of this butterfly are disrupted, the Monarch butterflies might be endangered. Agriculture might be affected as the weeds acquire the modified genes to become more competitive. The risk of the evolution of common plant viruses to become more resistant or form new strains will be greatly increased. If genetic modification is carried out extensively, new viruses with greater potential to harm humankind may evolve, and the probability of this occurring can be quite high. Human health risk. At least some of the genes used in GMOs may not have been used in the food supply before, so GM foods may pose a potential risk for human health. Much of the GM production currently grown worldwide is destined for animal feed. The FAO has concluded that risks to human and animal health from the use of GM crops and enzymes derived from GM microorganisms as animal feed are negligible. But scientists acknowledge that 191 little is known about the long-term safety of consuming food made from GM products. WHO recognizes the need for continued safety assessments on genetically modified foods before they are marketed to prevent risks to human health and for continued monitoring. The potential of GM crops to be allergenic is one of the main suspected adverse health effects. Many scientific data

indicate that animals fed by GMO crops have been harmed or even died. Rats exposed to transgenic potatoes or soy had abnormal young sperm; cows, goats, buffalo, pigs and other livestock grazing on Bt-maize, GM cottonseed and certain biotech corn showed complications including early deliveries, abortions, infertility and also many died. However, this is a controversial subject as studies conducted by company producing the biotech crops did not show any negative effects of GM crops on mice. Although Agri-biotech companies do not accept the direct link between the GMOs consumption and human health problems, there are some examples given by the opponents (Maghari, B. M., & Ardekani, A. M., 2011). For example: The foodborne diseases such as soy allergies have increased over the past 10 years in USA and UK and an epidemic of Morgellons disease in the US. There are also reports on hundreds of villagers and cotton handlers who developed skin allergy in India. Recent studies have revealed that Bacillus thuringiensis corn expresses an allergenic protein which alters overall immunological reactions in the body. The aforementioned reports performed by independent GMO researchers have lead to a concern about the risks of GMOs and the inherent risks associated with the genetic technology. Intellectual property rights are one of the important factors in the current debate on GMOs. The GM crops are patented by Agri-business companies leading to monopolization of the global agricultural food and controlling distribution of the world food supply (Maghari, B. M., & Ardekani, A. M., 2011). Social activists believe that the hidden reason why biotech companies are eager to produce GMO crops is because they can be privatized, unlike ordinary crops which are the natural property of all humanity. It is argued for example that to achieve this monopoly, the large Agri-biotech company, Monsanto, has taken over small seed companies in the past 10 years and has become the biggest Agri-biotech Corporation in the world. The patent right for vegetable forms of life also affect the livelihoods of family farmers as they are required to sign a contract preventing them from saving and replanting the seeds, thus they have to pay for seeds each year. Critics, thus advise that the risks for the introduction of a GMOs into each new ecosystem need to be examined on a case-by-case basis, alongside appropriate risk management measures, such as through the precautionary principle in the Cartagena Protocol and the IPPC’s Pest Risk Assessment (PRA).

Introduction

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

GMO Crops on the African Continent

Related Documents