KIN 352 lab 1

pdf

School

University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

352

Subject

Biology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

8

Uploaded by ProfTreeRabbit45

Report
Gornik 1 Lab Report 1- Nick Gornik Introduction Background Lab number one is separated into two different tests, the first being the CMVJ (vertical jump) and the second being the WAnT (Wingate test.) Both of the tests in this lab require students to use both the ATP-PC energy system as well as the anaerobic glycolytic energy system. Using these two tests is the best option for measuring anaerobic power. Purpose This lab's intention is to measure anaerobic power from the CMVJ and also measure anaerobic capacity and power during the WAnT test. When we receive our data, we can then draw conclusions and correlations between the two data sets. Hypothesis I hypothesize that the relative peak power between the two tests will be drastically different. This is based on the time difference in testing, the CMVJ being a one rep test and the WAnT lasting half a minute. The CMVJ will have a higher relative peak power because it will only use the ATP-PC system. Methods The CMVJ test was administered among 14 students of mixed gender, specifically it was nine females and 5 males. The participants were required to stand flat footed and reach as high as they naturally could on the Vertec. By doing this they established a standing reach height. The students then stand under the Vertec and do a vertical jump off of both feet, reaching with their
Gornik 2 dominant hand as high as they could to move the rungs. By seeing the rungs that were moved you could establish the students jump height. The jump was administered three times with breaks in between each attempt. The WAnT was also attempted and completed by the same 14 students used for the CMVJ test. For the WAnT test the students used a cyclus 2 cycle ergometer as the instructor put in the mass of the student and set up the cycle. Students had the option to warm up if they prefer before starting a maximum thirty second cycle sprint. The cycle will start recording once the monitor hits one hundred RPM’s, once finished, the student could get off the cycle or cool down by slowly cycling. Results Wingate CMVJ Subject ID +Gender (M/F) Mass (Kg) PP (W) PP (W∙kg -1 ) AP (W) AP (W∙kg -1 ) PP (W) PP (W∙kg -1 ) 1 (M) 91.65 1135.6 12.4 845 9.2 1678.4 18.3 2 (F) 42 302.7 7.2 147.3 3.5 553.5 13.2 3(M) 89.4 821.0 9.2 587.3 6.6 1400.9 15.7 4 (M) 110.25 1245.7 11.3 878.9 7.9 1982.6 17.9 5 (M) 63.4 553.3 8.7 448.6 7.1 727.7 11.5 6 (F) 75.05 658.8 8.8 533.6 7.1 1117.2 14.9 7 (F) 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 879.3 13.4 8 (M) 97.35 911 9.4 715.8 7.3 1701.3 17.5 9 (F) 71.55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 (F) 71.35 600.4 8.4 393.8 5.5 873.0 12.2 11 (F) 52.1 443.2 8.5 373.6 7.2 765 14.7 12 (F) 56.5 467.8 8.3 359.8 6.4 757.3 13.4 13 (F) 56.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14 (F) 70.9 553.4 7.8 466.3 6.6 1041.0 14.7 Average 72.4 699.3 9.1 522.7 6.8 1123.1 14.8
Gornik 3 Create a scatter plot with CMVJ absolute peak power on the x-axis and WAnT absolute peak power on the y-axis. Use the subjects from our lab that completed both tests. Plot a linear trend line and display the R 2 value on the chart A very strong positive correlation was established between the WAnT and the CMVJ tests with an R^2 value of .9358. The score on the CMVJ was higher for every student that participated. Males had a peak power advantage of about 600 W over the females.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gornik 4 Male students had a relative power advantage compared to the female students. Males had an advantage of about 400 W on the WAnT test over the females. Men had a higher relative power during the WAnT test.
Gornik 5 This bar graph compares the relative power during each test, the WAnT and the CMVJ. The results show that all students regardless of gender scored better on the vertical jump substantially. Discussion 1. Discuss which major energy system(s) you think were fueling the movement during the CMVJ and WAnT, and talk about how ATP is generated by the system(s) The CMVJ test used the ATP-PCr system due to the short duration of the event. The body can use the ATP-PCR system for about 10-15 seconds depending on the athlete or participant. ATP is created by freeing an inorganic phosphate from creatine and combining it with ADP to form ATP. 2. Based on the correlation you found between power output for the WAnT and CMVJ tests, did one test accurately predict the other? Discuss the implications of this relationship. Lastly how would use incorporate these tests to track progression in athletic performance in a training program? The graph had a strong correlation between the two tests which means they went hand in hand. A strong correlation in the two tests means that a person that can efficiently use the ATP-PCR system can also use the anaerobic glycolysis cycle to produce energy (ATP.) I think you could use these tests to track progression by simply administering these tests
Gornik 6 before a program to get a baseline number. Once you have finished the program you should have the athlete do the tests again and track the improvement. You can also incorporate specific exercises to improve things like your vertical jump ( Karatrantou, 2019.) 3. Are there sex differences in absolute power? Does this relationship hold when assessed as relative peak power? Is this consistent with what is known? If there is a difference, what do you think the reasons might be? The results of these tests show a clear indication that Males have a much larger power output compared to females. When holding relative power in account it is still in the males favor. Males have an advantage compared to females when it comes to strength or aerobic tasks (Jones, 2016.) 4. Explain your chosen graph. What observation did you make? Why is the chosen graph interesting or useful? I chose to do a graph on the difference in power output between the WAnT test and the CMVJ test. The graph shows clearly that people of both genders on average had an increased power output. I think this is because it is only using the PCR-ATP system. This is interesting because I did not know how the results would conclude.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gornik 7 Works Cited Jones, Margaret, et al. “Greater Strength Drives Difference in Power between Sexes in the Conventional Deadlift Exercise.” Sports , vol. 4, no. 3, 5 Aug. 2016, p. 43, https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4030043 . Karatrantou, Konstantina, et al. “Can Sport-Specific Training Affect Vertical Jumping Ability during Puberty?” Biology of Sport , vol. 36, no. 3, 2019, pp. 217–224, https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2019.85455 .
Gornik 8