Sathish-ANTHRO1022-Assignment 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Western University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1022
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by Help_Pls
Anthro 1022, Winter 2021
Assignment 2 Response Template
Student Name: Nitin Sathish
Remember to upload this template as a Word document (do not convert to Pages or PDF).
Responses should be 400 words (+/-10%; acceptable range = 360-440).
Take a position.
Now that you have had a chance to review the materials, do you think Canadian museums should or should not repatriate the Indigenous material culture in their collections? Why? Who should care for them and for what purpose?
As a good anthropologist will always do for any issue, you should consider multiple perspectives on the debate. How do different value systems and Canada’s colonial history come into play? Why do you think some perspectives should take precedence over others in this case.
Whether you argue for or against repatriation, what recommendations would you make to help address the concerns of those who take the other side in the debate? Response:
The question of whether Canadian museums should repatriate Indigenous material culture held within their collections is a complex and ethically charged debate. Taking the position that museums should indeed repatriate such artifacts is grounded in a commitment to rectifying historical injustices, respecting Indigenous sovereignty, and fostering cultural sensitivity. One of the arguments in favor of repatriation is the moral imperative to correct historical injustices. Canada's colonial history, marked by
the forced removal of Indigenous communities from their lands and the imposition of European values, has left a lasting impact. The removal and display of Indigenous material culture in museums without consent perpetuate the power imbalances stemming from this history. Repatriation, therefore, becomes crucial in acknowledging and rectifying these historical wrongs. Furthermore, the value systems embedded in Indigenous material culture are intimately tied to their communities. Repatriation allows for the restoration of cultural connections and the revitalization of traditional practices, fostering a sense of identity and pride. Museums, as custodians of these artifacts, should recognize the importance of returning them to their rightful owners for the well-being and cultural continuity of Indigenous communities. However, acknowledging the importance of repatriation does not negate the concerns raised by those advocating against it. Some argue that museums serve as crucial educational tools, allowing the broader public to learn about and appreciate diverse cultures. The fear is that repatriation might lead to a loss of learning opportunities and cultural exchange. The “Parthenon Marbles” video by PBS News Hour emphasizes this perspective, showcasing how artifacts can serve as global cultural touchpoints and foster a broader understanding of human history. The value systems at play here reflect broader societal perspectives on cultural ownership and the need for historical accountability. While some may prioritize the educational mission of museums, the ethical imperative to address historical injustices and empower marginalized communities takes precedence in
the argument for repatriation. To mediate against the concerns of those opposing repatriation, a collaborative approach is necessary. Museums can engage in partnerships with Indigenous communities to develop educational programs and exhibits that showcase the richness of Indigenous cultures. By doing so, museums can maintain their educational mission while respecting the autonomy and wishes of Indigenous peoples. Overall, the repatriation of Indigenous material culture in Canadian museums is a moral imperative rooted in justice, reconciliation, and respect for Indigenous rights. The multiple arguments surrounding this debate highlight the need for a nuanced approach that considers historical injustices, cultural connections, and educational values. By fostering collaboration and finding innovative ways to preserve and share cultural knowledge, museums can play a crucial role in healing the wounds of the past and building a more inclusive future.
Anthro 1022, Winter 2021
Word count (acceptable range = 360-440):
439
Anthro 1022, Winter 2021
Grading Rubric
Please do not delete this rubric. The TAs will use this rubric to grade your discussion activity.
The assignment will be graded out of 20 marks. Exceptional
Response
Meets
Expectations
Needs more
Details
Below
Expectations
Total
Strength of
Argument
- Provides clear, nuanced explanation of multiple arguments on each side of the debate (4.5 - 5) marks)
- Refers to wide range of sources in providing well-
developed & clearly justified reasons for choice
to repatriate or not (5.5 - 7 marks)
- Correctly identifies arguments on both sides (3 - 4 marks)
- Draws on sources to explain reasoning for choice (4 - 5 marks)
-Additional explanation and/or fuller justification would further strengthen response - Some discussion of arguments on both sides
-Some explanation of reasoning but connections could be more explicit and/or better elaborated
-May include minor factual errors or internal
contradictions
- Vague; lacking clarity
- Response is underdeveloped and poorly explained - Often includes factual errors, misconceptions and/or internal contradictions 9
10 - 12 marks
8 - 9 marks
5.5 - 7 marks
0 - 5.5 marks
Recommendations
for addressing
concerns
- Correctly identifies and clearly explains two or more concerns that could be raised by
other side of debate and
- Suggests thoughtful ways to mediate against
each - Clearly articulates at least one concern
(1 - 2 marks) and provides good explanation of how to mediate against it (3 - 4 marks)
- Concerns identified but explanation is not fully developed
-Some suggestion of how to mediate, but needs elaboration - Little or no discussion of concerns and how
to mediate against them
7
6.5 - 8 marks
6 marks
4.5 – 5.5
0 - 4 marks
Total /20:
16
Note:
-1 point for over/under word count; -1 for >10 spelling/grammar/punctuation errors; -1 for submitting PDF/Pages rather than Word document
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help