CRJ 523_WE1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Saint Leo University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
521
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by Bucca40
Written Exercise: Module 1
Alma I. Cano
Department of Public Safety Administration, Saint Leo University
CRJ 521: Offender Treatment Methodology
Professor Ernie Vendrell
August 31, 2023
2
Abstract
This paper critically examines the possibility of a paradigm shift within the criminal justice system, which involves replacing classical theories with a more human science-based theory of human behavior. The central question addressed is whether this shift will result in the replacement of punishment with a focus on the management of crime. Additionally, the potential dangers to the community associated with both positions are discussed. This analysis is supported by academic research and aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the implications of Hollin's paradigm shift concept.
Keywords:
criminal justice paradigm shift, criminal justice reform, restorative justice
3
Introduction
The criminal justice system is constantly evolving, and the concept of a paradigm shift has
been proposed by scholars like Hollin (Hollin, 2005). This shift suggests a move from classical
theories to a more human science-based approach to understanding human behavior and
managing crime. This paper aims to academically discuss the pros and cons of Hollin's paradigm
shift concept, with a particular focus on whether it might replace punishment with a
management-oriented approach and the potential implications for the community.
Structuring the Program for Evaluation
In the intricate endeavor of crafting a program with the potential to substantially reduce recidivism rates, a methodical and comprehensive approach is indispensable. The foundational framework of the program's design will be based on the insights of Campbell (2006) regarding correctional leadership competencies, highlighting a multitude of essential managerial and supervisory skills. Central to this approach will be the cultivation of adeptness in effective communication, adept conflict resolution, and the profound capability to ignite transformative change both among the staff and the inmate population. To ensure a rigorous evaluation of the program's effectiveness, a multifaceted assessment plan will be meticulously constructed, as advised by Martin (2015). This evaluative framework will be dual-pronged, enlisting both process and outcome evaluations, each serving a distinct but symbiotic purpose. The process evaluation component will diligently oversee the intricate landscape of program implementation, vigilantly monitoring the degree of adherence to the meticulously devised program design. This granular scrutiny is imperative to ascertain that the program's core principles are being translated into practice with unswerving fidelity.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
Concurrently, the outcome evaluation facet will hone its focus on the tangible impact of the
program, particularly on recidivism rates and concomitant factors that intricately interlace with them. In this facet, the evaluation will encompass an expansive purview, extending to encompass
the intricate dynamics of inmate behavior transformation and active engagement in the panoply of rehabilitative activities offered within the correctional facility. By scrutinizing these multifarious aspects, the evaluation seeks to not only quantify the immediate effects of the program but also to delve deeper, unraveling the subtle yet profound shifts catalyzed by the program in the complex ecosystem of the correctional environment.
In essence, the structured design of the program serves as the crucible in which aspirations are forged, while the meticulously outlined evaluation plan ensures that these aspirations are not merely ephemeral visions, but tangible and sustainable steps towards transformative change. Through this dual-pronged approach, the correctional facility endeavors to lay the foundation for a paradigm shift – one that emanates from a program's meticulous structure and reverberates through the intricate web of evaluation, ultimately manifesting as a profound reduction in recidivism rates.
Steps for Implementation
Implementing the recidivism reduction program requires careful planning and execution. Drawing inspiration from Gladwin and McConnell's (2014) insights on effective corrections management, the following steps will be taken:
5
1.
Needs Assessment:
Conduct a thorough assessment of the facility's current state, including inmate population, available resources, and existing programming. Identify gaps and areas where recidivism reduction efforts are most needed.
2.
Stakeholder Engagement:
Involve key stakeholders, including correctional staff, inmates, community organizations, and external experts. Their insights will inform program design and foster buy-in.
3.
Program Design:
Develop a tailored program that combines evidence-based practices, cognitive-behavioral interventions, vocational training, and educational opportunities. Ensure the program addresses the unique challenges and needs of the inmate population.
4.
Training and Capacity Building:
Equip correctional staff with the necessary skills to implement the program effectively. Training will encompass program objectives, facilitation techniques, and conflict resolution strategies.
5.
Pilot Testing:
Launch a pilot phase of the program in a controlled setting. Gather feedback from staff and inmates to identify any adjustments needed before full-scale implementation.
6.
Rollout and Monitoring:
Gradually expand the program to involve more inmates. Continuously monitor implementation fidelity and participant engagement. Address any challenges promptly.
6
7.
Data Collection:
Collect relevant data on inmate participation, behavior changes, and recidivism rates. Ensure data is collected consistently and accurately to support robust evaluation.
8.
Program Evaluation:
Regularly assess the program's progress through both process and outcome evaluations. Make data-driven adjustments to enhance effectiveness.
9.
Communication:
Maintain open communication channels with stakeholders. Share progress, challenges, and successes to foster transparency and accountability.
Conclusion
Reducing recidivism stands as an intricate and formidable challenge within the landscape of correctional facilities. However, in the face of this challenge, the prospect of success becomes all the more promising when a comprehensive and well-structured program is coupled with an unwavering commitment to meticulous evaluation. The fusion of these two dynamic components
not only holds the potential to drive transformative change but also offers a beacon of hope for the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals within the correctional system.
By intertwining the intricate threads of leadership competencies delineated by Campbell (2006), the craftsmanship of change management elucidated by Hurley and Hanley (2010), and the strategic acumen of program evaluation provided by Martin (2015), correctional leaders can weave a program that serves as a testament to their unwavering dedication and visionary approach. This program, firmly grounded in the bedrock of leadership acumen and astute management, possesses the potential to carve pathways toward lasting positive change. It embraces not only the inmates but also the staff, ultimately fostering an environment wherein
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
rehabilitation and reformation flourish. Yet, crafting such a program is merely the first stride in a
multifaceted journey. Effective implementation, underpinned by a judicious allocation of resources and the meticulous choreography of activities, is of paramount importance. The implementation phase serves as a crucial bridge that transforms theoretical constructs into palpable actions. Yet, it is not a solitary endeavor; it is a symphony that involves orchestrating the participation and commitment of stakeholders at every level of the correctional hierarchy. In this transformative journey, the steering wheel of progress is guided not merely by aspirations but also by vigilant evaluation. It is through the lens of evaluation that the true impact of the program comes to light. Through its multifaceted gaze, encompassing process evaluations to gauge adherence and outcome evaluations to quantify transformation, the program is held accountable. Yet, this evaluation is not a static endeavor; it is a dynamic process that requires continuous vigilance and unwavering dedication. It is through the act of consistently peering through the evaluative lens that the correctional leaders glean insights into the program's efficacy, making informed data-
driven adjustments to ensure its sustained effectiveness.
The endeavor to reduce recidivism is not merely a function; it is a commitment to creating a safer, more rehabilitative, and ultimately more humane correctional environment. The synergy of a well-structured program and the vigilance of meticulous evaluation is the harbinger of change. It is a testament to the power of visionary leadership, astute management, and an enduring dedication to societal betterment. As correctional leaders embark on this transformative
odyssey, they are not merely reshaping the walls of confinement; they are reshaping lives, rekindling hope, and reshaping the trajectory of those who seek redemption. Through their
8
pioneering efforts, the aspiration of a reduced recidivism rate becomes a tangible reality, underscoring that within the realm of correctional facilities, the power to effectuate transformation lies not just in the potential of individuals but in the holistic synergy of structured programs, meticulous evaluation, and a shared commitment to lasting change.
9
References
Campbell, N. M. (2006). Correctional leadership competencies for the 21st century: Manager and supervisor levels. National Institute of Corrections. https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.nicic.gov/Library/020475.pdf
Gladwin, B. P. & McConnell, C. R. (2014). The effective corrections manager: Correctional supervision for the future (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. ISBN: 978-1-4496-
4546-5
Hurley, M. H. & Hanley, D. (2010). Correctional administration and change management. Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-1-4398-0392-9
Martin, A. B. (2015, March 1). Plan for program evaluation from the start. National Institute of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/plan-program-evaluation-start
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help