Week9_assignment (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Indiana University, Bloomington *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
L111
Subject
Anthropology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by HighnessMagpie3741
Name: __Eleanor Dickie________
Section Leader: Rose_______
Section Time:_8am____
L111
Prof. Ragsdale
Discussion assignment 7, due Week 9
Phylogenetics
This assignment provides practice toward Learning Outcomes #1 and #4 of the course.
Instructions:
* Print this worksheet and complete questions
#1
and
#2
before Discussion
. Write your answers with a black
pen.
* Submit your completed worksheet electronically (
e.g.
, completed in Microsoft Word or scanned) to your
Discussion section on Canvas before arriving to Discussion. This will be checked for completion. Bring the
original, completed hard copy with you to Discussion.
* Also bring a blue pen to Discussion section. You will be able to make corrections to wrong answers using blue
ink; to get credit for these questions, you must have fully answered them before coming to Discussion. Also, for
any corrected answers, you will need to explain why the correct answer really is correct.
* Complete question
#3
during Discussion.
* Show all your work, even for multiple-choice questions.
* The completed and (as necessary) corrected worksheet is due to your TA at the end of Discussion section.
* To help you study for exams, you may take photos of your work during Discussion, take notes on a separate
sheet of paper or on a personal device, or both.
* This worksheet counts for 77% of your Discussion grade for the week.
Purpose:
This assignment designed to reinforce and expand your skills in using phylogenetic logic. Being able
to interpret a phylogenetic tree—both the tree’s structure and the characters mapped onto the tree—is essential
for studies of macroevolution, or evolution above the species level.
(1)
Interpreting a phylogenetic tree
.
Those words and those strings of words mean a lot more still if you can relate them to a phylogeny in practice.
Phylogenies are packed with evolutionary information – if you know how to read them.
So, let’s look at a phylogeny of fishes (to the left).
Note that humans, like other four-legged
vertebrates, are “tetrapods”. Humans are
particularly fond of eating teleost fishes (salmon,
cod, tilapia, etc.). Answer some questions about this
phylogeny.
(A) Is group 2, the “lobe-finned fish” a
monophyletic group?
Why or why not?
Yes, because the species listed are all common
descendants of G which is also in the group.
(B) Is group 1, the “ray-finned fishes”, a
monophyletic group? Why or why not?
Yes, because the most recent common ancestor, E,
is within the group, along with all of it’s descendants
(C) What is/are the sister taxon/taxa of a monophyletic group formed by bowfins and teleost fishes?
Gars
(D) What is/are the sister taxon/taxa of the monophyletic group formed by bowfins, teleosts, and gars?
Sturgeon & Paddlefish
(E) Which (now almost certainly) extinct taxa forms the most recent common ancestor of the lobe-finned
fishes?
G
(F) Group 1 (lobe-finned fishes) and Group 2 (ray-finned fishes) together form a monophyletic group (
i.e
.,
clade) called the “bony fishes” (Osteichthyes). They make skeletons out of bone instead of cartilage. Sharks and
rays make their skeletons out of cartilage. Based on this description alone:
(i) What is the
synapomorphy
that describes the bony fishes?
Skeletons of bone instead of cartilage
(ii) Which trait described is
ancestral
? Which is
derived
?
Ancestral trait is skeletons of bone instead of cartilage, and the derived trait is skeletons of cartilage
(iii) What is the outgroup for the bony fishes?
Sharks & Rays
(G) Are tetrapods (four-limbed vertebrates) in the fish clade (monophyletic group)? Explain.
Yes, because tetrapods evolved from fish in the fish clade
(H) Imagine going home for Thanksgiving and telling your family, “Believe it or not, we are fishes.” Someone
at the table gets upset and says that “tetrapods are not fishes!” (assume they know the word “tetrapods” for the
sake of the problem, OK?). If they exclude tetrapods from the fish phylogeny, which phylogenetic error are they
committing (
i.e.
, are they making a
paraphyletic
or
polyphyletic
group out of fishes?)
Explain.
They would be making a paraphyletic group out of fishes because they are failing to include all of the
recent descendants of fish, i.e. tetrapods.
(I) Which split is more ancient:
E
or
F
? Why? Explain.
E is more ancient, because F only evolved once into tetrapods and lungfish, where as E has many steps
of evolution ( C, B, A, )
(J) Which is the most common recent ancestor between us (tetrapods) and those teleosts? How recent was that
most recent common ancestor?
The most recent common ancestor between tetrapods and teleosts is H, which is not very recent, as H
evolved 5 times into teleosts.
(2)
Application of phylogenetic principles through sample exam questions
.
(A) Which description does
NOT
describe a
synapomorphy
?
(a) It is the version (state) of a trait (character) that defines a monophyletic group.
(b) It is a trait that organisms share due to homology (i.e., it reflects shared ancestry)
(c) We could call it “derived.” Plesiomophies are “ancestral.”
(d) It is an evolutionary innovation that unites a group of taxa through common descent.
(e) All of the above choices describe a synapomorphy well.
(B) When we create phylogenetic trees built around monophyletic groups, we use the principle of parsimony.
What statement best describes the rationale behind this principle?
(a) Parsimony identifies the outgroup, a vital step in determining which traits are ancestral and which are
derived.
(b) It is difficult for evolutionary innovations to arise, so they should be rare.
(c) Evolutionary innovations typically arise due to convergent evolution; parsimony then groups those
homoplasies together in a logical way.
(d) Both (a) and (b) are true.
(e) Both (b) and (c) are true.
(C) “We are fishes.” Which choice best supports the reasoning behind this statement?
(a) This statement is true if we include all tetrapods in a fish clade.
(b) We share a common ancestor with bony fishes.
(c) This statement is not true since walking on four legs is a synapomorphy of tetrapods.
(d) Both (a) and (b) are true.
(D) When you go home for Thanksgiving break, your grandfather is outraged that you are learning evolutionary
biology. He says, “humans did not descend from monkeys, period.” If you were to convey how evolutionary
biologists view the issue, what would you say to him? “Gpa, from an evolutionary biologist’s point of view…”
(a) “Correct, we did not evolve from modern monkeys, but we share a common ancestor with them”.
(b) “Incorrect, we did evolve from modern monkeys because we share a common ancestor with them”.
(c) “We share a much more common ancestor with chimps and gorillas than monkeys, actually”.
(d) Both (a) and (c) are true.
(e) Both (b) and (c) are true.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
(E) Consider the phylogeny of SIV – immunodeficiency viruses that infect simians – and HIV, those that infect
humans (see phylogeny below).
Phylogenetic evidence here supports the following statement:
(a) The ability of HIV to infect humans is a homology
: it is a trait that is
arises from
shared, common ancestry
.
(b) The ability of HIV to infect humans is a homoplasy
: it is a trait that is
arises from
shared, common ancestry.
(c) The ability of HIV to infect humans is a homology
: it arises
independently, from
convergent evolution
.
(d)
The ability of HIV to infect humans is a
homoplasy
: it arises
independently, from
convergent evolution
.
(F). Behold the phylogeny to the below. Imagine that you wanted to make a group using the existing, present-
day taxa H, J, and K. Would this group be:
(a) Monophyletic
(b) Paraphyletic
(c) Polyphyletic
(d) We cannot differentiate between paraphyletic and polyphyletic
groups here.
(3)
Inferring a phylogeny.
Imagine you study plant-parasitic nematodes (I mean, why wouldn’t you?), and are trying to find plant
resistance to economically damaging, sedentary parasites. Whether you can find common resistance
mechanisms often depends on whether the pathogenesis trait, in this case sedentary parasitism, is only
superficially similar (analogous) or similar due to shared ancestry (homologous). Now that you have sampled a
certain gene sequence for several plant-parasitic species, answer the following questions:
(A)
Use the principle of parsimony to infer the phylogeny of the plant-parasitic nematode species below.
How many steps (
i.e.
,
changes of character state) does this tree require? Use
Mesocriconema xenoplax
as the outgroup.
5
(B)
Given the taxa you have sampled, do sedentary parasites form a monophyletic group,
i.e.
, to the
exclusion of migratory parasites?
No, because the most recent common ancestor of the sedentary parasites had other descendants
that were migratory parasites
(C)
Based on the above results, infer whether sedentary parasitism evolved once or twice, assuming that this
complex trait is irreversible.
Sedentary parasitism evolved twice
Note that this problem is simply an expanded version of the four-taxon, five-character phylogeny problem we
worked through during lecture. It is more advanced than you should expect to see on the exam, meant to give
you the “medicine ball” approach to tackling phylogenetics. And a hint: for a small dataset like this, you might
try working out the solution for multiple trees to help find the most parsimonious solution.
Type of parasitism
Species
DNA sequence
Sedentary
Meloidogyne incognita
A-G CAG GTA CTA
Sedentary
Heterodera glycines
ACG CGG GCA CGG
Migratory
Hoplolaimus indicus
ACG CGG G-A CGG
Migratory
Pratylenchus penetrans
ACG CAG GTA CTA
Migratory
Scutellonema bradys
ACG CGG GCA CGA
Migratory
Mesocriconema
xenoplax
ACC CAG GCA CTA
Mesocriconema
xenoplax
Scutellonema
Hoplolaimus
Heterodera
Meloidogyne
Pratylenchus
bradys
indicus
glycines
incognita
penetrans
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682a7/682a70803f86bf3f21cb1b59cfeafac867cd41ae" alt="Text book image"
Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...AnthropologyISBN:9780393938661Author:Clark Spencer LarsenPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682a7/682a70803f86bf3f21cb1b59cfeafac867cd41ae" alt="Text book image"
Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company