106 - 11 online new
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Wichita State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
106
Subject
Anthropology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by AdmiralSardineMaster965
Wichita State University
Name:
ANTH 106 Fall 2022
Tuesday/Thursday
Instructor: Buchanan-Burke
Lab 11 –The Genus
Homo
SECTION 3: The genus
Homo
Each fossil of a hominin represents a unique individual. Therefore, no two fossil hominins share
identical morphologies. Morphological similarities can cluster fossils into the same species, but
there is no rule regarding how similar fossils must be to each other to belong to the same species.
Sometimes researchers disagree over whether a fossil represents a new species or belongs to a
previously established species. This is especially difficult to determine because primates can
have high degrees of sexual dimorphism. Males and females of the same species can look very
different and establishing the sex of an individual from fossil remains can be very difficult.
Therefore, a new fossil could represent the other sex of a species already established in the fossil
record or a truly new species.
Measures of variation (i.e., size and shape differences) can help determine whether a fossil’s
morphology reasonably falls within the estimates of an existing species. In this lab, we will
examine the morphological characteristics of each of the fossils and discuss the justifications for
separating them into subsequent genera and species.
Australopithecines
Australopithecus afarensis
– This is one of the oldest of the australopithecines.
Australopithecus
Afarensis lived between approximately 3.9 and 2.9 mya.
Australopithecus exhibit
post-orbital
constriction
that is greater than more recent hominins, but less than extant (still alive)
hominoids.
Australopithecus africanus
–
A. africanus
was one of the first hominin ancestor fossils ever
discovered, when in 1924 Raymond Dart excavated the
Taung Child
.
A. africanus
is
remarkably similar to
A. afarensis
, yet we still prefer to keep them separate.
Paranthropines
Most of the Paranthropines were discovered in eastern Africa.
The Paranthropines are known for
their wide,
‘Dish-shaped’
face.
This is a result of large temporal muscles (chewing muscles)
that run underneath the zygomatic arches.
The wide face shape combined with the robust, flat
molars of the Paranthropines led to the hypothesis that Paranthropines ate mostly grasses and
seeds.
The sagittal crest is also a characteristic of the Paranthropines that is a result of the strong
temporal muscles.
Paranthropines have been classified into three species:
P. aethiopicus
(2.5
mya)
, P. robustus
(1.8-1.2 mya)
,
and
P. boisei
(2.3-1.2 mya).
Early Homo
H. habilis
is currently the oldest species included in the genus
Homo
(the oldest known
specimens have been dated to ~2.4 million years ago). However, this taxon is controversial,
because the specimens included within it exhibit a high degree of variation. It is not known
whether these specimens truly all belong to
H. habilis
or whether the sample includes
representatives of multiple species.
Also, although
H. habilis
shares certain morphology, especially its limb proportions, are more
similar to the earlier australopiths. Some researchers have even proposed that
Australopithecus
habilis
is a more appropriate species name.
Sagittal Crest
3.1
(5 pts)
Do the morphologies between the
Australopithecines
and
Paranthropines
differ
drastically?
I would not say that they differ drastically but there is a difference between the morphologies of
Australopithecines and Paranthropines. Most notable differences would be the teeth/jaw
difference as well as a possible cranium difference.
3.2
(5 pts)
How do the
Paranthropines
compare to the morphology of
Homo
?
Post Orbital Constriction
Sagittal Crest
Face to Vault Ratio
and Prognathism
The Paranthropines have a sagittal crest, they also have a much flatter and rounder skull
compared to the Homo. Homo has a much higher range of cc (500-800) compared to
Paranthropines (410-550).
3.3
(5 pts)
Are the
Paranthropines
more similar to
Australopithecus
or later
Homo?
Support your
argument.
The Paranthropines are more similar to the Australopithecus. When comparing the skull of the
two they look more similar in size. Their cc is also in a much closer range with 410-550 and
420-510.
3.4
(5 pts)
Write a brief paragraph (6-8 sentences) describing how each of the separate species of
hominin fossils may or may not distinct and separate species.
Use sexual dimorphism and
punctuated equilibrium/gradualism to help your answer.
Determining wheter a hominin is a separate species involves navigating a few complexities.
Right now, there is no crystal-clear definition of what makes something distinclty human.
Sometimes, the differences between males and females within a species might make it seem like
they are two separate groups of species when in actuality they’re part of the same group. This is
what is called sexual dimorphism (differences between the sexes). On top of that, if a species
faces big environmental, it might go through rapid changes and create a new species. This
process, called punctuated equilibrium, means that new species might not immediately look
different from the original one. The way species evolve can be either gradual or sudden, adding
another layer of complexity. Therefore, figuring out if hominins are distinct and separate species
involves considering these twists and turns in evolution and understanding that appearances can
sometimes be deceiving.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
SECTION 4: Punctuated equilibrium and gradualism
In 1972 Eldredge and Gould took a look at the fossil record and noticed a trend.
The trend was
that there were major evolutionary changes that occurred in spurts in-between long spans of
time.
The theory was that evolutionary changes and development would occur rapidly and in
spurts, and it was termed ‘Punctuated Equilibrium’.
The other side of the argument is
gradualism.
Gradualism suggests that evolutionary changes occur gradually and slowly over
long timespans.
Microevolutionary changes occur at a very slow rate which slowly build up to a
macroevolutionary change.
4.1
(5 pts)
What are some of the problems regarding punctuated equilibrium when one looks at
the fossil record?
Some fossil records indicate that there is slow gradual changes over time rather than rapid
changes in a short period of time. There is also no explanation as to how and why these drastic
changes could occur so quickly.
4.2
(5 pts)
Is gradualism a better or worse interpretation of the fossil record than punctuated
equilibrium? Why?
Right now, the fossil evidence seems to support punctuated equilibrium rather than gradualism as
a more accurate interpretation of the fossil record. However, it is important to note that neither
idea has been proven 100%. Therefore it is important to keep an open mind about both
interpretations when it comes to trying to understand the complexities of evolution.
4.3
(5 pts)
Could punctuated equilibrium and gradualism be combined to form a new
intermediate hypothesis? Explain why or why not.
I think we can blend punctuated equilibrium and gradualism to form a new intermidiate
hypothesis. Evolution could happen slowly over time or in sudden bursts, depending on the
environment and it’s challenges. This approach acknowledges both sides, and can help form a
sophisticated guess that embraces the complexity of the evolutionary process.
Take-Home Assignment:
Visit
https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/mystery-skull-interactive
Identify Each of the Mystery Skulls and provide an explanation for how you correctly (or
incorrectly) identified each fossil.
1.
Mystery Skull 1- I chose Homo Neanderthalensis from France 60,000 years old. Because
of the prominent brow ridge, large face, and the cheekbones that are angled back from
the nose.
2.
Mystery Skull 2- I chose Homo Habilis from Kenya 1.9 million years old. Because of both
having smaller teeth, slightly sloppy face, smaller braincase, and seem to be slightly
similar in shape and size.
3.
Mystery Skull 3- I chose the Homo Erectus from Indonesia because they are both
portraying a elongated braincase and a bigger brow ridge. I chose Indonesia over China
because the shape/size seemed to have matched more.
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...AnthropologyISBN:9780393938661Author:Clark Spencer LarsenPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company

Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company