Bipedalism Lab Activity- KEY

pdf

School

University of Arkansas *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1011L

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by isabellasanchez401

Report
YOUR NAME:______ KEY ______________ LAB SECTION:__________________ THE BIPEDAL ADAPTATION This lab is designed to introduce you to the human body as it compares to our closest living relative, the chimpanzee, and our fossil relatives. The lab mainly focuses on aspects of the skeleton that relate to bipedal locomotion, and how to apply what we learn from extant species to those in the fossil record. Lab Objectives Describe the shape and orientation differences between certain aspects of ape and human anatomy Identify similarities of fossil casts to modern humans Document characteristics that show differences in the early hominins Station 1 Knee Joints The shaft of the femur in humans and apes is either in line with the tibia (non-valgus knee/straight femur), or at an angle to the tibia at the knee joint (valgus knee/bicondylar angle present). You can see whether or not the femur is angled when you stand the femur on its distal end on the table. View it from the front does the femur stand straight up from the table, or is it at an angle? Alternatively, you can look at the condyles of the femur at the knee. A condyle is either of the two large articular surfaces on the distal femur. If the medial condyle is larger, the shaft of the femur will sit at an angle on the tibia such that the knee angles inward. Describe the angle of the knee and femur in the non-human primate and hominin (humans and their fossil relatives) taxa below: Non-human primates Feature Baboon ( Papio hamadryas ) Chimp ( Pan troglodytes ) Siamang ( Symphalangus syndactylus ) Rhesus macaque ( Macaca mulatta ) Indri ( Indri indri ) Knee angle Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Hominins Feature A. afarensis H. erectus Human ( H. sapiens ) Knee Angle Valgus Valgus Valgus
1 1. What patterns do you observe in the angulation (or lack of angulation) of the knee in non human primates vs. hominins? All the non-human primates have a straight femur/ non-valgus knee, all the hominins have a valgus knee 2. What is the effect of having a valgus angle on the position of the knees under the body? How would having a valgus knee benefit a biped? The valgus angle places the knees directly under the torso. When walking bipedally, the body's weight is supported on a single foot. The valgus knee places that support directly beneath the body's center of mass. If the knee were placed on the lateral side of the body, the torso would tend to collapse to the unsupported side. 3. How does the knee joint of Homo erectus compare to the non-human primates and other hominins? H. erectus has a valgus knee joint just like the Homo sapiens and A. afarensis. 4. What can you infer about the locomotion of Homo erectus ? If the knee joint of Homo erectus is identical to human knee joints, then the locomotor repertoire is likely very similar to humans, i.e. It was bipedal. 5. How does the knee joint of Australopithecus afarensis compare to the non-human primates and other hominins? Australopithecus afarensis also has a valgus knee like Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. 6. What can you infer about the locomotion of Australopithecus afarensis ? Just like Homo erectus, if the knee joint of A. afarensis is identical to human knee joints, then the locomotor repertoire is likely very similar to humans, i.e. It was bipedal.
2 Station 2 Skull characteristics Now, compare the lemur, macaque, chimp, gorilla, human, Sahelanthropus , Ardipithecus and Paranthropus skulls . For each specimen, describe the position of the foramen magnum as anterior, posterior, or intermediate. Feature Ring-tail lemur ( Lemur catta ) Rhesus macaque ( Macaca mulatta ) Chimpanzee ( Pan troglodytes ) Gorilla ( Gorilla gorilla ) Foramen magnum position Posterior Posterior Intermediate Intermediate Feature Sahelanthropus Ardipithecus Paranthropus Human ( Homo sapiens ) Foramen magnum position ?Intermediate Anterior Anterior Anterior 1. What anatomical structure passes through the foramen magnum? The spinal cord passes through the foramen magnum 2. What is the relationship between foramen magnum position and locomotion? Posterior = Quadrupedalism; Anterior = Bipedalism; Intermediate = Knuckle Walking 3. In the features discussed above, do you think Sahelanthropus is more like a chimpanzee, like a human, or is it unique? What about Ardipithecus and Paranthropus ? Compare the foramen magnum position in all three of these fossil species. What does this position tell us about locomotion in these species? Support your opinion with specific examples! The foramen magnum in Ardipithecus and Paranthropus is much more similar to humans in its placement, while the foramen magnum of Sahelanthropus appears somewhat more intermediately placed, though perhaps a bit more anterior than in chimpanzees. This suggests that Ardipithecus and Paranthropus had upright head postures, as would be involved in bipedalism. What the locomotion in Sahelanthropus would have been like is slightly less clear. (also note crushed state of Sahelanthropus skull).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
3 Station 3 Pelvis Shape Pelvis shape is strongly related to locomotion. The shape and orientation of the iliac blades (the superior portions of the pelvis that are broad and flat) is particularly important for the orientation of the gluteal muscles. In humans, these muscles help stabilize the torso during bipedal walking. Compare the orientation of the iliac blade in the following species, making sure to describe the iliac blades as more coronally oriented (i.e., facing posteriorly) or more sagittally oriented (i.e., facing more laterally). Shape of the iliac blades also varies; in each of these species, describe the relative height and width of the iliac blade. Is it short, tall, narrow, and/or wide? Feature Chimp (Pan troglodytes) A. afarensis H. erectus H. neanderthalensis Human ( Homo sapiens ) Iliac blade orientation Coronal Sagittal (strong flaring) Sagittal Sagittal Sagittal Iliac blade height and width Tall and narrow Short and wide Short and wide Short and wide Short and wide 1. Compare the shape of the iliac blade in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes . How would you describe the shape of the iliac blade in these two species? In what anatomical plane does the iliac blade lie in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes ? Pan troglodytes has a long and narrow iliac blade while the iliac blade in Homo sapiens is short, but wide and splayed. Sagittal plane = Homo sapiens Coronal plane = Pan Troglodytes 2. Compare the size and orientation of the iliac blades in Australopithecus afarensis , Homo erectus, and Homo neanderthalensis to the pelvis of Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes . How would you describe the shape of the ilium in the three extinct hominins? Are they more similar to humans or to chimps? Pan troglodytes iliac blades are taller, narrow and oriented in the coronal plane. In all of the hominins, the iliac blades are shortened and rotated into the sagittal plane, as is the case for modern humans. 3. What can you infer about the role of the gluteal muscles as a balancing mechanism in the three fossil hominins? In chimpanzees, the gluteal muscles lie posterior to the hip joint and function as hip extensors. But in all three fossil hominins, the gluteal muscles lie lateral to the hip joint and function as hip stabilizers when the body's weight is supported on a single foot. The gluteal
4 muscles on the balancing side fire to keep the torso from collapsing towards the unsupported foot. 4. Does the pelvis of Australopithecus differ from that of Homo sapiens in any way? Describe any shape differences you observe. Yes, the pelvis of Australopithecus is smaller than Homo sapiens and the iliac blades are not pointed forward to the same degree. 5. Now examine the pelvis of H. erectus . Which extant taxon does it most closely resemble? What does this tell you about the locomotion of this species? H. erectus most closely resembles H. sapiens. They therefore must have walked bipedally. Station 4 The Foot Foot shape is also critical for locomotion. Non-bipedal primates have opposable big toes that angle away from the long axis of the foot as well as long and curved toes for grasping. In contrast, bipedal primates have a big toe that is line with the rest of the toes and tends to be larger than the big toe of non-bipedal primates; they also have arches running along the length and width of the foot. In each of the specimens below, describe the big toe position (either divergent or parallel). Note that several more fragmentary fossil specimens are provided, so you will have to reconstruct toe position by comparing all of the specimens to one another. You should also describe the curvature of the toes/phalanges (curved or not curved), and identify whether the specimen has an arched foot (arch present or absent). *Ask your TA to help you orient the feet in the correct anatomical position.* Feature Chimp ( Pan troglodytes ) Ardipithecus Homo habilis Human ( Homo sapiens ) Big toe position Divergent Divergent Parallel Parallel Toe/ phalanx curvature Curved Somewhat curved Straight Straight Presence of arches Absent Absent Present Present 1. How is the big toe used during bipedal locomotion in Homo sapiens ? How does this differ from how the big toe is used in apes?
5 In humans the big toe is used for balance and propulsion; in the apes the big toe is used for grasping 2. Does the ape have an arched foot like a human? Hint: Be careful not to confuse toe/phalanx curvature with true arches of the foot. No. Apes don't have an arch. Humans have 3 arches, two longitudinal and one transverse 3. What are some possible reasons for the arch in the human foot? Hint: Think about the different functions of an ape and human foot during locomotion The arch in the human foot helps to evenly distribute weight and absorbs shock as the foot hits the ground during bipedal locomotion. 4. Compare the shape of the foot in Ardipithecus and Homo habilis to the morphologies you observe in chimps and humans. Which extant taxon do each of these specimens most closely resemble? What does this tell you about the locomotion of these species? (Make sure to support your answer with specific examples). The foot of Ardipithecus is much more similar to the chimp foot in that it has no arch, long curved toes, and a grasping big toe. This suggests that Ardipithecus was still using its foot for grasping and was not fully bipedal. The foot of Homo habilis is much more similar to humans (arches present, parallel big toe), indicating that this species would have been bipedal. Station 5 Footprints At this station is a topographic representation (and a 3D print) of fossil footprints from the site of Laetoli, Tanzania that have been dated to 3.6 million years ago. The trackways were made when a few Australopithecus individuals (one in the left trackway and two in the right trackway, producing the appearance of a larger footprint on the right) walked across an African plain recently covered by ash and rain from a volcanic eruption. The footprints were preserved when the wet ash hardened like cement and then was covered by more ash and sediments. Compare the shape of these fossil footprints to the pictures of chimp and human footprints at this station. Feel free to walk in these footprints and compare your stride to what would have been the stride of the Australopithecus individuals who created these footprints. 1. How do the footprints compare to what you expect from humans and apes? In comparison to humans, the footprints are smaller and more closely spaced. The big toe appears to be parallel to the rest of the foot, which differs from the apes. 2. How do the footprints reflect the aspects of foot morphology you identified in Station 4? Use specific examples to justify your answer. 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The footprints are very similar to humans in that they have an arch, short stubby toes, and a big toe in line with the rest of the toes. 3. What do these footprints tell us about the way Australopithecus moved? These footprints tell us that Australpithecus was bipedal, in a very similar way to modern humans. 7