Bipedalism Lab Activity- KEY
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Arkansas *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1011L
Subject
Anthropology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
7
Uploaded by isabellasanchez401
YOUR NAME:______
KEY
______________ LAB SECTION:__________________
THE BIPEDAL ADAPTATION
This lab is designed to introduce you to the human body as it compares to our closest living
relative, the chimpanzee, and our fossil relatives. The lab mainly focuses on aspects of the
skeleton that relate to bipedal locomotion, and how to apply what we learn from extant species to
those in the fossil record.
Lab Objectives
•
Describe the shape and orientation differences between certain aspects of ape and human
anatomy
•
Identify similarities of fossil casts to modern humans
•
Document characteristics that show differences in the early hominins
Station 1
–
Knee Joints
The shaft of the femur in humans and apes is either in line with the tibia (non-valgus
knee/straight femur), or at an angle to the tibia at the knee joint (valgus knee/bicondylar angle
present). You can see whether or not the femur is angled when you stand the femur on its distal
end on the table. View it from the front
–
does the femur stand straight up from the table, or is it
at an angle?
Alternatively, you can look at the condyles of the femur at the knee. A condyle is either of the
two large articular surfaces on the distal femur. If the medial condyle is larger, the shaft of the
femur will sit at an angle on the tibia such that the knee angles inward.
Describe the angle of the knee and femur in the non-human primate and hominin (humans and
their fossil relatives) taxa below:
Non-human primates
Feature
Baboon
(
Papio hamadryas
)
Chimp
(
Pan troglodytes
)
Siamang
(
Symphalangus
syndactylus
)
Rhesus
macaque
(
Macaca mulatta
)
Indri
(
Indri indri
)
Knee angle
Straight
Straight
Straight
Straight
Straight
Hominins
Feature
A. afarensis
H. erectus
Human
(
H. sapiens
)
Knee Angle
Valgus
Valgus
Valgus
1
1. What patterns do you observe in the angulation (or lack of angulation) of the knee in non
human primates vs. hominins?
All the non-human primates have a straight femur/ non-valgus knee, all the hominins have a
valgus knee
2. What is the effect of having a valgus angle on the position of the knees under the body? How
would having a valgus knee benefit a biped?
The valgus angle places the knees directly under the torso.
When walking bipedally, the body's weight is supported on a single foot. The valgus
knee places that support directly beneath the body's center of mass. If the knee were
placed on the lateral side of the body, the torso would tend to collapse to the unsupported
side.
3. How does the knee joint of
Homo erectus
compare to the non-human primates and other
hominins?
H. erectus has a valgus knee joint just like the Homo sapiens and A.
afarensis.
4. What can you infer about the locomotion of
Homo erectus
?
If the knee joint of Homo erectus is identical to human knee joints, then the locomotor repertoire
is likely very similar to humans, i.e. It was bipedal.
5. How does the knee joint of
Australopithecus afarensis
compare to the non-human primates
and other hominins?
Australopithecus afarensis also has a valgus knee like Homo erectus and Homo
sapiens.
6. What can you infer about the locomotion of
Australopithecus afarensis
?
Just like Homo erectus, if the knee joint of A. afarensis is identical to human knee joints, then the
locomotor repertoire is likely very similar to humans, i.e. It was bipedal.
2
Station 2
–
Skull characteristics
Now, compare the lemur, macaque, chimp, gorilla, human,
Sahelanthropus
,
Ardipithecus
and
Paranthropus
skulls
.
For each specimen, describe the position of the foramen magnum as
anterior, posterior, or intermediate.
Feature
Ring-tail
lemur
(
Lemur
catta
)
Rhesus
macaque
(
Macaca mulatta
)
Chimpanzee
(
Pan troglodytes
)
Gorilla
(
Gorilla gorilla
)
Foramen
magnum
position
Posterior
Posterior
Intermediate
Intermediate
Feature
Sahelanthropus
Ardipithecus
Paranthropus
Human
(
Homo sapiens
)
Foramen
magnum
position
?Intermediate
Anterior
Anterior
Anterior
1. What anatomical structure passes through the foramen magnum?
The spinal cord passes through the foramen magnum
2. What is the relationship between foramen magnum position and locomotion?
Posterior
= Quadrupedalism; Anterior = Bipedalism; Intermediate = Knuckle Walking
3. In the features discussed above, do you think
Sahelanthropus
is more like a chimpanzee,
like a human, or is it unique? What about
Ardipithecus
and
Paranthropus
? Compare the
foramen magnum position in all three of these fossil species. What does this position tell
us
about locomotion in these species?
Support your opinion with specific examples!
The foramen magnum in Ardipithecus and Paranthropus is much more similar to humans in
its placement, while the foramen magnum of Sahelanthropus appears somewhat more
intermediately placed, though perhaps a bit more anterior than in chimpanzees. This suggests
that Ardipithecus and Paranthropus had upright head postures, as would be involved in
bipedalism. What the locomotion in Sahelanthropus would have been like is slightly less
clear. (also note crushed state of Sahelanthropus skull).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
3
Station 3
–
Pelvis Shape
Pelvis shape is strongly related to locomotion. The shape and orientation of the iliac blades (the
superior portions of the pelvis that are broad and flat) is particularly important for the orientation
of the gluteal muscles. In humans, these muscles help stabilize the torso during bipedal walking.
Compare the orientation of the iliac blade in the following species, making sure to describe the
iliac blades as more coronally oriented (i.e., facing posteriorly) or more sagittally oriented (i.e.,
facing more laterally). Shape of the iliac blades also varies; in each of these species, describe the
relative height and width of the iliac blade. Is it short, tall, narrow, and/or wide?
Feature
Chimp
(Pan troglodytes)
A. afarensis
H. erectus
H. neanderthalensis
Human
(
Homo sapiens
)
Iliac blade
orientation
Coronal
Sagittal
(strong
flaring)
Sagittal
Sagittal
Sagittal
Iliac blade
height and
width
Tall and
narrow
Short and
wide
Short and
wide
Short and wide
Short and
wide
1. Compare the shape of the iliac blade in
Homo sapiens
and
Pan troglodytes
. How would you
describe the shape of the iliac blade in these two species? In what anatomical plane does the
iliac blade lie in
Homo sapiens
and
Pan troglodytes
?
Pan troglodytes has a long and narrow iliac blade while the iliac blade in Homo sapiens
is short, but wide and splayed.
Sagittal plane = Homo sapiens
Coronal plane = Pan Troglodytes
2. Compare the size and orientation of the iliac blades in
Australopithecus afarensis
,
Homo
erectus,
and
Homo neanderthalensis
to the pelvis of
Homo sapiens
and
Pan troglodytes
.
How would you describe the shape of the ilium in the three extinct hominins? Are they more
similar to humans or to chimps?
Pan troglodytes iliac blades are taller, narrow and oriented in the coronal plane. In all of the
hominins, the iliac blades are shortened and rotated into the sagittal plane, as is the case for
modern humans.
3. What can you infer about the role of the gluteal muscles as a balancing mechanism in the
three fossil hominins?
In chimpanzees, the gluteal muscles lie posterior to the hip joint and function as hip
extensors. But in all three fossil hominins, the gluteal muscles lie lateral to the hip joint and
function as hip stabilizers when the body's weight is supported on a single foot. The gluteal
4
muscles on the balancing side fire to keep the torso from collapsing towards the unsupported
foot.
4. Does the pelvis of
Australopithecus
differ from that of
Homo sapiens
in any way? Describe
any shape differences you observe.
Yes, the pelvis of Australopithecus is smaller than Homo sapiens and the iliac blades are not
pointed forward to the same degree.
5. Now examine the pelvis of
H. erectus
. Which extant taxon does it most closely resemble?
What does this tell you about the locomotion of this species?
H. erectus most closely resembles H. sapiens. They therefore must have walked bipedally.
Station 4
–
The Foot
Foot shape is also critical for locomotion. Non-bipedal primates have opposable big toes that
angle away from the long axis of the foot as well as long and curved toes for grasping. In
contrast, bipedal primates have a big toe that is line with the rest of the toes and tends to be larger
than the big toe of non-bipedal primates; they also have arches running along the length and
width of the foot.
In each of the specimens below, describe the big toe position (either divergent or parallel). Note
that several more fragmentary fossil specimens are provided, so you will have to reconstruct toe
position by comparing all of the specimens to one another. You should also describe the
curvature of the toes/phalanges (curved or not curved), and identify whether the specimen has an
arched foot (arch present or absent).
*Ask your TA to help you orient the feet in the correct anatomical position.*
Feature
Chimp
(
Pan troglodytes
)
Ardipithecus
Homo habilis
Human
(
Homo sapiens
)
Big toe position
Divergent
Divergent
Parallel
Parallel
Toe/ phalanx
curvature
Curved
Somewhat curved
Straight
Straight
Presence of
arches
Absent
Absent
Present
Present
1. How is the big toe used during bipedal locomotion in
Homo sapiens
? How does this differ
from how the big toe is used in apes?
5
In humans the big toe is used for balance and propulsion; in the apes the big toe is used for
grasping
2. Does the ape have an arched foot like a human?
Hint: Be careful not to confuse toe/phalanx
curvature with true arches of the foot.
No. Apes don't have an arch. Humans have 3 arches, two longitudinal and one transverse
3. What are some possible reasons for the arch in the human foot?
Hint: Think about the
different functions of an ape and human foot during locomotion
The arch in the human foot helps to evenly distribute weight and absorbs shock as the foot
hits the ground during bipedal locomotion.
4. Compare the shape of the foot in
Ardipithecus
and
Homo habilis
to the morphologies you
observe in chimps and humans. Which extant taxon do each of these specimens most closely
resemble? What does this tell you about the locomotion of these species? (Make sure to
support your answer with specific examples).
The foot of Ardipithecus is much more similar to the chimp foot in that it has no arch, long
curved toes, and a grasping big toe. This suggests that Ardipithecus was still using its foot for
grasping and was not fully bipedal. The foot of Homo habilis is much more similar to humans
(arches present, parallel big toe), indicating that this species would have been bipedal.
Station 5
–
Footprints
At this station is a topographic representation (and a 3D print) of fossil footprints from the site of
Laetoli, Tanzania that have been dated to 3.6 million years ago. The trackways were made when
a few
Australopithecus
individuals (one in the left trackway and two in the right trackway,
producing the appearance of a larger footprint on the right) walked across an African plain
recently covered by ash and rain from a volcanic eruption. The footprints were preserved when
the wet ash hardened like cement and then was covered by more ash and sediments.
Compare the shape of these fossil footprints to the pictures of chimp and human footprints at this
station. Feel free to walk in these footprints and compare your stride to what would have been
the stride of the
Australopithecus
individuals who created these footprints.
1. How do the footprints compare to what you expect from humans and apes?
In comparison to humans, the footprints are smaller and more closely spaced. The big toe
appears to be parallel to the rest of the foot, which differs from the apes.
2. How do the footprints reflect the aspects of foot morphology you identified in Station 4? Use
specific examples to justify your answer.
6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
The footprints are very similar to humans in that they have an arch, short stubby toes, and a
big toe in line with the rest of the toes.
3. What do these footprints tell us about the way
Australopithecus
moved?
These footprints tell us that Australpithecus was bipedal, in a very similar way to modern
humans.
7
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682a7/682a70803f86bf3f21cb1b59cfeafac867cd41ae" alt="Text book image"
Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...AnthropologyISBN:9780393938661Author:Clark Spencer LarsenPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682a7/682a70803f86bf3f21cb1b59cfeafac867cd41ae" alt="Text book image"
Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Third Editio...
Anthropology
ISBN:9780393938661
Author:Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company