640 2-1 Discussion- Auditor Independence

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

640

Subject

Accounting

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by MinisterGoldfishPerson907

Report
640 2-1 Discussion: Auditor Independence The value of auditing depends heavily on the public’s perception of the independence of auditors. The reason that many diverse users are willing to rely on CPA reports is the users’ expectation of an unbiased viewpoint. (Arens, Elder, Beasley, & Hoganst a, 2020). In my opinion an auditor’s independence is essential because their interpretations and analysis can effect companies on a global scale. As an extreme example let’s say an auditor over-inflates a public company’s growth and as a result people decide to invest heavily. Their stock market price increases, but the following quarter they go bankrupt. When looking at one company, perhaps it doesn’t seem that bad, but if it was allowed to happen on a larger scale with dozens or hundreds of companies it could have a potentially global effect on the stock market and the economy. This is also why the need for independence in auditing is so different than in any other profession. No other profession has so much power in our economy and world. In August of 2023 PCAOB sanctioned Blue & Co., LLC fining them $75,000 and requiring that they review and certify their internal independence policies. The PCAOB found that Blue violated auditor independence rules and auditing standards during its 2018 and 2019 audits of three employee benefit plans. The firm allowed one of its partners to serve as the engagement partner for those audits immediately after the same individual had served as the engagement quality reviewer or engagement partner during Blue’s 2013-2017 audits of the same three employee benefit plans. Under auditor independence rules, “lead” and “concurring” partners are required to rotate off an engagement after a total of five years in either role and, upon rotation, must be off the engagement for five years. (PCAOB, August 9, 2023) Investors rely on firms to maintain their objectivity by following auditor independence terms. By not rotating out the partners as required the firm compromised its objectivity and independence in its internal audit process.
For my second example, I’d like to discuss how PCAOB levied their first-ever sanctions related to a firm’s membership in an accounting alliance when they fined Warren Averett, LLC $200,000 and required them to review and certify its auditor independence policies in August of 2023. “The PCAOB found that Warren Averett violated independence requirements during its 2019 and 2020 audits of an issuer, because the firm audited valuations performed for the issuer by another accounting firm that sponsored an alliance of which Warren Averett was a member. Given its alliance membership and association with the other accounting firm, Warren Averett had a disincentive to question the reasonableness of the other accounting firm’s valuation work. Thus, both Warren Averett and the issuer shared a mutual interest in the reasonableness of the valuations.” (PCAOB, August 29, 2023)  This is such an important violation because it is the first ever of it’s kind. Many firms work in alliances with each other, however if those same firms then perform audits on each other their independence may be called into question. How can they be objective when they are linked to the audit client so intimately? These examples, I believe, really highlight the dangers of skirting the line on independence. If auditors were not held to these standards then what use would anything they provided be, in the end? If a consumer could not be sure of the independence and objectivity of an audit, how could they possibly make informed decisions? This is true of the general public investing their funds, but also true of the management of the companies being audited. If the audit was biased, they would not be informed to make the best decisions for the future growth of the company. References: Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2020).  Auditing and Assurance Services  (17th ed.). Pearson.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2023, August 29). PCAOB Sanctions Blue & Co., LLC for Auditor Independence and Quality Control Violations. https://pcaobus.org/news- events/news-releases/news-release-detail/pcaob-sanctions-blue-co-llc-for-auditor-independence- and-quality-control-violations Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2023, August 29). PCAOB Sanctions Warren Averett, LLC for Auditor Independence and Quality Control Violations. https://pcaobus.org/news-events/news-releases/news-release-detail/pcaob-sanctions-warren- averett-llc-for-auditor-independence-and-quality-control-violations
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help