CJ-207 Assignment 6-2

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Reread the Module B introduction about ScottLondon, CPA.Required:a. What code violations have occurred in this case?b. What is the range of penalties that the PCAOB could levy against London? By the California State Board of Accountancy?c. What do you think is the appropriate penalty?

Green, a police officer, suspected that Brown was engaged in illegal racketeering activities. To obtain evidence of Brown’s illegal conduct, Green place a bug in Brown’s home without a warrant. Green may have violated which of Brown’s constitutional rights? A. Fourteenth Amendments rights. B. Fifth Amendments rights. C. Sixth Amendments rights. D. Fourth Amendments rights.

After the Madoff case, the SEC instituted a number of reforms to its operations. Please visit the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and search for Post-Madoff reforms. Next, please identify the two reforms that you believe will have the best chance of catching a criminal like Madoff. Make sure to provide justification for your choices.

During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.

Heer  Don't upload any image please

What best describes the effect of the word fiend in this excerpt? It establishes the time period in which the story occurred by using language that is not typically used in today's society. It develops the conflict by establishing the fact that Judge Lenon is unforgiving when he feels that someone has been unpatriotic. It enhances the theme of the story by suggesting that it is nearly impossible to receive a fair trial during this time period. It characterizes Judge Lenon as a corrupt judge who does not care to serve justice

Cartage Inc. agrees to pick up two truckloads of housewares for Discount Corporation and store the contents to be delivered later. After Cartage unloads the goods at its storage facility, some of them disappear from the loading dock. A court will presume that   a.  the goods were stolen through no fault of Cartage.     b.  the warehouse is in a high-crime area.     c.  Cartage was negligent.     d.  Discount was negligent

The exclusionary rule: A. Prohibits a party from testifying about the contents of a document without producing the document itself. B. Refers to the warnings advising suspects that they have the right not to answer questions and the right to legal counsel during an investigation. C. Provides that, if the government violates an individual’s constitutional rights during an investigation, if cannot prosecute the person whose rights were violated. D. Provides that, if evidence is unconstitutionally seized, that evidence cannot be used in a criminal prosecution against the person whose rights were violated.

12) Yakov is an executive of Fit Corp., a chain of fitness clubs. For years, he successfully hid illegal and misleading accounting practices, but eventually, he was exposed and punished with a jail sentence under the A) Celler-Kefauver B) Glass-Steagall C) Dodd-Frank D) Gramm-Leach-Bliley E) Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Bret, a resident of Nevada, wants to bring a tort claim (a type of civil lawsuit) against Steve, a resident of Tennessee, for damage to Bret's house in Nevada. To use a long-arm statute to obtain personal jurisdiction over Steve, the Nevada court must find that Multiple Choice Steve committed a crime in Nevada Steve also damaged property in Tennessee and owns a home in Tennessee Steve has committed prior torts in Nevada Steve committed the tort in Nevada

Able, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed a suspect involved in an environmental crime. The suspect, Blake, admitted to purposely polluting the environment. Blake’s action eventually caused almost thirty people to develop serious environmentally related illness. Upon hearing this fact from Blake, Able should: A. Scold Blake for his conduct. B. Make no comment whatever. C. Treat Blake with decency and respect. D. Ask Blake to apologize to the victims.