Discussion 4-1

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

693

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MagistrateTurtleMaster890

Report
Recall the discussion about the Peregrine Case  in Module Two. The fraud was discovered at Peregrine when electronic confirmations were introduced. What are advantages to electronic confirmations? What are risks associated with electronic confirmations? In your responses to your peers, do you agree with their assessment of the risks associated with electronic confirmations? Can you suggest ways to mitigate the risks associated with electronic confirmations? Do you agree with the advantages? Why or why not? “In July 2012, Peregrine Financial Group filed for bankruptcy following the discovery that $215 million customer balances had been embezzled.” (Elder, et. at., 2013) The company CEO had embezzled millions from the company over a 20-year timespan. He did so by utilizing programs like photoshop and excel, while also ensuring any and all financial information pertaining to the company be sent directly to him to open. In this particular case, paper documents seemed to be the most utilized form Wasendorf used to commit fraud. As paper-based audits have been the norm since the beginning, it doesn’t always mean they are the perfect way to detect fraud. McConnell states, “Confirmations can be an effective tool for auditors working with accounts including payables and receivables, inventory, investment securities, lines of credit, and other actual or contingent liabilities.” (McConnell, et. al., 2008) Confirmations can be used to provide evidence about “key assertations related to revenue and collections, in particular, existence and valuation.” (Casey, 2019) Electronic confirmations assist in alleviating the issues that tend to arise when using paper ones. In terms of time, electronic confirmations take less time and improve the response rate for auditors. While electronic confirmations are efficient, it does not mean they are without risks. Some risks include the cost to implement may be too great. Another risk could be low response rates, or the respondent is unauthorized to respond. Lastly, another risk could be fraud due to forgeries or collusion. References Elder, R. J., Janvrin, D. J., & Caster, P. (2014). Peregrine--Twenty Years of Fraudulent Cash Balances. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(2), 337–348. https://doi- org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.2308/iace-50690 Mcconnell And Charles H.  Schweiger. (2008, April 1). Better Evidence Gathering . Journal of Accountancy. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2008/apr/betterevidencegathering.html Pcaobus. (n.d.). https://assets.pcaobus.org/pcaob-dev/docs/default-source/rulemaking/ docket_028/2023-008_confirmation-adopting-release.pdf?sfvrsn=e18cef74_2
Hi Kiley, Great post! I think you did a great job touching upon the usefulness of electronic confirmations. I agree with your statement that they are much more secure than paper. Given the case study, where paper statements were altered, I think your statement holds value. I also agree with your statement that electronic confirmations save time and money. Though the initial implementation may be costly, the long-term costs outweigh that immensely. Though electronic confirmations are efficient they aren’t perfect. You did a great job highlighting the risks that arise with them. Do you think there will come a time where we can rely on the confirmations to be correct with little verifications? Thank you, Janieva Hi Ashley, I agree with your statement that electronic confirmations are easy to ascertain. They make the jobs of an auditor easier, while removing paper from the equation. I like that you pointed out that there have been serval cases where the weaknesses of paper-based confirmations. It highlights the need to lessen the use of paper-based confirmations going forward. Electronic confirmations are flawed, and this case can highlight how they are. I believe the case focused more on the altering of paper statements, rather than statement received by the auditor directly from the bank. If Wasendorf had someone at the bank altering the statements on his behalf, the electronic confirmations would be a risky endeavor. Thank you, Janieva
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help