The Woodson Foundation, a large non-profit social service agency, is teaming up with the public-school system in Washington D. C. to improve student outcomes. There’s ample room for improvement. The school have problems with truancy, low student performances, and crime. The plan is to create an experimental after-school program that will continue the Woodson Foundation’s skills of raising private money and coordinating community leaders with the educational expertise of school staff. There is a little doubt some substantive conflicts will arise. Each group has its own interests and in some cases these conflicts are directly opposed to one another. School district representatives want to ensure that the new jobs will be unionized and will operate in a way that is consistent with current school board policies. The National Coalition for Parental Involvement in Education (NCPIE) will be the major partner in the program, acting as a representative for parents on behalf of the PTA. Characters in the case: Victoria Adams, Superintendent of schools for Washington DC. Duane Hardy, Principle in the Washington Area. Mason Dupree, Community organizer. Ari Kaufman, Teacher Meredith Watson, Woodson Foundation. Candace Sharpe Victor Martinez, Woodson Foundation. Adequate information: The first stage of the plan is to bring this plan to fruition is the formation of an executive development team. This team will span multiple functional areas and establish the operating plan for improving school performance. Some demographic diversity issues complicate the team’s situation; most of the students served by the Washington DC school district are African American, along with large population of Caucasians and Hispanics. The NCPIE makeup generally matches the demographic diversity of the areas served by the public schools. To explain: Who would likely to be a good group member and who might be less effective in this situation.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter CC, Problem 18CC

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

The Woodson Foundation, a large non-profit social service agency, is teaming up with the public-school system in Washington D. C. to improve student outcomes. There’s ample room for improvement. The school have problems with truancy, low student performances, and crime. The plan is to create an experimental after-school program that will continue the Woodson Foundation’s skills of raising private money and coordinating community leaders with the educational expertise of school staff.

There is a little doubt some substantive conflicts will arise. Each group has its own interests and in some cases these conflicts are directly opposed to one another. School district representatives want to ensure that the new jobs will be unionized and will operate in a way that is consistent with current school board policies.

The National Coalition for Parental Involvement in Education (NCPIE) will be the major partner in the program, acting as a representative for parents on behalf of the PTA.

Characters in the case:

Victoria Adams, Superintendent of schools for Washington DC.

Duane Hardy, Principle in the Washington Area.

Mason Dupree, Community organizer.

Ari Kaufman, Teacher

Meredith Watson, Woodson Foundation.

Candace Sharpe

Victor Martinez, Woodson Foundation.

Adequate information:

The first stage of the plan is to bring this plan to fruition is the formation of an executive development team. This team will span multiple functional areas and establish the operating plan for improving school performance.

Some demographic diversity issues complicate the team’s situation; most of the students served by the Washington DC school district are African American, along with large population of Caucasians and Hispanics. The NCPIE makeup generally matches the demographic diversity of the areas served by the public schools.

To explain:

Who would likely to be a good group member and who might be less effective in this situation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Make a total of 19-20 slides below the topic and give some briefs, which I should say as a speech for presentation time with that slide. (a) title slide(b) the content of the presentation and the presenter (4presenter-for each 4-5 slide) for each section(c) Topic: Factor what is more important to Gen X,Y,Z in their receptivity to international assignments. Critically discuss how factors such as culture, personality, and skills/experience may impact generational differences. The presentation should discuss how managers can use human resource planning to attract a multigenerational workforce interested in international career assignments.it considers the internal and external labour supply

This question is regarding business negotiation BUS356 in SUSS. The case below is extracted from Harvard Business Review Case Study “Move Fast,but without Bias: Ethical AI Development in a Start-up Culture”. It is important to support your answers with specific examples based on thescenario given in the case study below to demonstrate your understanding andapplication of the relevant concepts. You may make reasonable assumptions, aspart of your analysis. Answers must be supported with theoretical models and concepts from therecommended textbook, Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M. & Barry, B. (2021). Essentialsof Negotiation (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition and coursematerials. Please provide useful links and citations for learning purposes.

This week we focused on how to manage corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability efforts. Initial Post Instructions Identify one CSR activity that would align well with the organization and country you selected for your final project. Explain why you believe this CSR activity is a good fit for both the organization and the selected expansion country. Describe one outcome that you would like to achieve from this CSR activity. In your responses to two classmates’ discussion posts, provide a different CSR activity that you recommend for your classmates’ projects. Alternatively, you may provide feedback to your classmates’ selected CSR activity pointing out a possible risk to this action and why you think this CSR activity is risky.