Some sequences are defined by a recursive formula- that is, a formula that defines each term of the sequence in terms of one or more of the preceding terms. For example, if a n is defined by a 1 = 1 and a n = 2 a n − 1 + 1 for n ≥ 2 Then a 2 = 2 a 1 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 1 + 1 = 3 a 3 = 2 a 2 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 3 + 1 = 7 a 4 = 2 a 3 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 7 + 1 = 15 and so on. In Problem 63 - 66 , write the first five terms of each sequence. a 1 = 1 and a n = 2 a n − 1 for n ≥ 2
Some sequences are defined by a recursive formula- that is, a formula that defines each term of the sequence in terms of one or more of the preceding terms. For example, if a n is defined by a 1 = 1 and a n = 2 a n − 1 + 1 for n ≥ 2 Then a 2 = 2 a 1 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 1 + 1 = 3 a 3 = 2 a 2 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 3 + 1 = 7 a 4 = 2 a 3 + 1 = 2 ⋅ 7 + 1 = 15 and so on. In Problem 63 - 66 , write the first five terms of each sequence. a 1 = 1 and a n = 2 a n − 1 for n ≥ 2
Solution Summary: The author calculates the first five terms of the sequence a_1=1, and the second term, using a recursive formula.
Some sequences are defined by a recursive formula- that is, a formula that defines each term of the sequence in terms of one or more of the preceding terms. For example, if
a
n
is defined by
a
1
=
1
and
a
n
=
2
a
n
−
1
+
1
for
n
≥
2
Then
a
2
=
2
a
1
+
1
=
2
⋅
1
+
1
=
3
a
3
=
2
a
2
+
1
=
2
⋅
3
+
1
=
7
a
4
=
2
a
3
+
1
=
2
⋅
7
+
1
=
15
and so on. In Problem
63
-
66
, write the first five terms of each sequence.
A driver is traveling along a straight road when a buffalo runs into the street. This driver has a reaction time of 0.75 seconds. When the driver sees the buffalo he is traveling at 44 ft/s, his car can decelerate at 2 ft/s^2 when the brakes are applied. What is the stopping distance between when the driver first saw the buffalo, to when the car stops.
Topic 2
Evaluate S
x
dx, using u-substitution. Then find the integral using
1-x2
trigonometric substitution. Discuss the results!
Topic 3
Explain what an elementary anti-derivative is. Then consider the following
ex
integrals: fed dx
x
1
Sdx
In x
Joseph Liouville proved that the first integral does not have an elementary anti-
derivative Use this fact to prove that the second integral does not have an
elementary anti-derivative. (hint: use an appropriate u-substitution!)
1. Given the vector field F(x, y, z) = -xi, verify the relation
1
V.F(0,0,0) = lim
0+ volume inside Se
ff F• Nds
SE
where SE is the surface enclosing a cube centred at the origin and having edges of length 2€. Then,
determine if the origin is sink or source.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.