![Essential Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259570643/9781259570643_largeCoverImage.gif)
a.
State the null and alternate hypotheses.
a.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
The hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
That is, there is no significant difference between the
Alternate hypothesis:
That is, the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
Explanation of Solution
The data represents the mean amount of rainfall of a chosen city in two consecutive years (year2 and year1).
Hypothesis:
Hypothesis is an assumption about the parameter of the population, and the assumption may or may not be true.
Let
Claim:
Here, the claim is, whether the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
The hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
Null hypothesis is a statement which is tested for statistical significance in the test. The decision criterion indicates whether the null hypothesis will be rejected or not in the favor of alternate hypothesis.
That is, there is no significant difference between the mean amount of rainfall of a city in year2 and year1.
Alternate hypothesis:
Alternate hypothesis is contradictory statement of the null hypothesis
That is, the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
b.
Compute the differences in amount of rainfalls Year2– Year1.
b.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
The differences in amount of rainfalls Year2– Year1 is,
S.no | |
1 | 9.5 |
2 | 3.4 |
3 | –3.8 |
4 | 10.1 |
5 | 8.9 |
6 | 5.7 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The differences in amount of rainfalls Year2– Year1 is,
S.no | Year2 | Year1 | |
1 | 34.6 | 25.1 | |
2 | 18.7 | 15.3 | |
3 | 42.6 | 46.4 | |
4 | 41.3 | 31.2 | |
5 | 60.6 | 51.7 | |
6 | 29.9 | 24.2 |
c.
Find the value of t-test statistic.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
The value of test statistic is 2.6118.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Test statistic:
The test statistic for matched pairs is obtained as,
where
matched pairs and
Mean and standard deviation of differences:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the mean and standard deviation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic statistic > Display
descriptive statistics . - In Variables, enter the column of Differences.
- In Statistics, select mean, standard deviation and N total.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the mean and standard deviation are 5.63 and 5.28.
The mean and standard deviation of the differences is 5.63 and 5.28.
Here, the
The test statistic is obtained as follows,
Thus, the test statistic is 2.6118.
d.
Find the P-value for the test statistic.
d.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
The P-value for the test statistic is 0.02378.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Degrees of freedom:
The degrees of freedom for the test statistic is,
Thus, the degree of freedom is 5.
P-value:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot.
- Choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘t’ distribution.
- In Degrees of freedom, enter 5.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X value and Right Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- In X-value enter 2.6118.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the P-value is 0.02378.
Thus, the P-value is 0.02378.
e.
Interpret the P-value at the level of significance
e.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
There is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
Explanation of Solution
From part (d), the P-value is 0.02378.
Decision rule based on P-value:
If
If
Here, the level of significance is
Conclusion based on P-value approach:
The P-value is 0.02378 and
Here, P-value is less than the
That is,
By the rejection rule, reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
f.
State the conclusion.
f.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 2CYU
There is enough evidence to conclude that the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
Explanation of Solution
From part (e), it is known that the null hypothesis is rejected.
That is, mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year2 is greater than the mean amount of rainfall of the city in year1.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Essential Statistics
- What were the average sales for the four weeks prior to the experiment? What were the sales during the four weeks when the stores used the digital display? What is the mean difference in sales between the experimental and regular POP time periods? State the null hypothesis being tested by the paired sample t-test. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis? At a 95% significance level, was the difference significant? Explain why or why not using the results from the paired sample t-test. Should the manager of the retail chain install new digital displays in each store? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardA retail chain is interested in determining whether a digital video point-of-purchase (POP) display would stimulate higher sales for a brand advertised compared to the standard cardboard point-of-purchase display. To test this, a one-shot static group design experiment was conducted over a four-week period in 100 different stores. Fifty stores were randomly assigned to the control treatment (standard display) and the other 50 stores were randomly assigned to the experimental treatment (digital display). Compare the sales of the control group (standard POP) to the experimental group (digital POP). What were the average sales for the standard POP display (control group)? What were the sales for the digital display (experimental group)? What is the (mean) difference in sales between the experimental group and control group? List the null hypothesis being tested. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis based on the results of the independent t-test? Was the difference between the…arrow_forwardQuestion 4 An article in Quality Progress (May 2011, pp. 42-48) describes the use of factorial experiments to improve a silver powder production process. This product is used in conductive pastes to manufacture a wide variety of products ranging from silicon wafers to elastic membrane switches. Powder density (g/cm²) and surface area (cm/g) are the two critical characteristics of this product. The experiments involved three factors: reaction temperature, ammonium percentage, stirring rate. Each of these factors had two levels, and the design was replicated twice. The design is shown in Table 3. A222222222222233 Stir Rate (RPM) Ammonium (%) Table 3: Silver Powder Experiment from Exercise 13.23 Temperature (°C) Density Surface Area 100 8 14.68 0.40 100 8 15.18 0.43 30 100 8 15.12 0.42 30 100 17.48 0.41 150 7.54 0.69 150 8 6.66 0.67 30 150 8 12.46 0.52 30 150 8 12.62 0.36 100 40 10.95 0.58 100 40 17.68 0.43 30 100 40 12.65 0.57 30 100 40 15.96 0.54 150 40 8.03 0.68 150 40 8.84 0.75 30 150…arrow_forward
- - + ++ Table 2: Crack Experiment for Exercise 2 A B C D Treatment Combination (1) Replicate I II 7.037 6.376 14.707 15.219 |++++ 1 བྱ॰༤༠སྦྱོ སྦྱོཋཏྟཱུ a b ab 11.635 12.089 17.273 17.815 с ас 10.403 10.151 4.368 4.098 bc abc 9.360 9.253 13.440 12.923 d 8.561 8.951 ad 16.867 17.052 bd 13.876 13.658 abd 19.824 19.639 cd 11.846 12.337 acd 6.125 5.904 bcd 11.190 10.935 abcd 15.653 15.053 Question 3 Continuation of Exercise 2. One of the variables in the experiment described in Exercise 2, heat treatment method (C), is a categorical variable. Assume that the remaining factors are continuous. (a) Write two regression models for predicting crack length, one for each level of the heat treatment method variable. What differences, if any, do you notice in these two equations? (b) Generate appropriate response surface contour plots for the two regression models in part (a). (c) What set of conditions would you recommend for the factors A, B, and D if you use heat treatment method C = +? (d) Repeat…arrow_forwardQuestion 2 A nickel-titanium alloy is used to make components for jet turbine aircraft engines. Cracking is a potentially serious problem in the final part because it can lead to nonrecoverable failure. A test is run at the parts producer to determine the effect of four factors on cracks. The four factors are: pouring temperature (A), titanium content (B), heat treatment method (C), amount of grain refiner used (D). Two replicates of a 24 design are run, and the length of crack (in mm x10-2) induced in a sample coupon subjected to a standard test is measured. The data are shown in Table 2. 1 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Which factor effects appear to be large? (b) Conduct an analysis of variance. Do any of the factors affect cracking? Use a = 0.05. (c) Write down a regression model that can be used to predict crack length as a function of the significant main effects and interactions you have identified in part (b). (d) Analyze the residuals from this experiment. (e) Is there an…arrow_forwardA 24-1 design has been used to investigate the effect of four factors on the resistivity of a silicon wafer. The data from this experiment are shown in Table 4. Table 4: Resistivity Experiment for Exercise 5 Run A B с D Resistivity 1 23 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I+I+I+I+Oooo 0 0 ||++TI++o000 33.2 4.6 31.2 9.6 40.6 162.4 39.4 158.6 63.4 62.6 58.7 0 0 60.9 3 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Plot the effect estimates on a normal probability scale. (b) Identify a tentative model for this process. Fit the model and test for curvature. (c) Plot the residuals from the model in part (b) versus the predicted resistivity. Is there any indication on this plot of model inadequacy? (d) Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals. Is there any reason to doubt the validity of the normality assumption?arrow_forward
- Stem1: 1,4 Stem 2: 2,4,8 Stem3: 2,4 Stem4: 0,1,6,8 Stem5: 0,1,2,3,9 Stem 6: 2,2 What’s the Min,Q1, Med,Q3,Max?arrow_forwardAre the t-statistics here greater than 1.96? What do you conclude? colgPA= 1.39+0.412 hsGPA (.33) (0.094) Find the P valuearrow_forwardA poll before the elections showed that in a given sample 79% of people vote for candidate C. How many people should be interviewed so that the pollsters can be 99% sure that from 75% to 83% of the population will vote for candidate C? Round your answer to the whole number.arrow_forward
- Suppose a random sample of 459 married couples found that 307 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 471 married couples, it was found that only 31 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. Find a95% confidence interval for . Round your answer to three decimal places.arrow_forwardA history teacher interviewed a random sample of 80 students about their preferences in learning activities outside of school and whether they are considering watching a historical movie at the cinema. 69 answered that they would like to go to the cinema. Let p represent the proportion of students who want to watch a historical movie. Determine the maximal margin of error. Use α = 0.05. Round your answer to three decimal places. arrow_forwardA random sample of medical files is used to estimate the proportion p of all people who have blood type B. If you have no preliminary estimate for p, how many medical files should you include in a random sample in order to be 99% sure that the point estimate will be within a distance of 0.07 from p? Round your answer to the next higher whole number.arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)