a
Introduction:
Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS): It is a method used to gauge the amount of misstatement in financials. MUS helps auditors to overcome difficulties in other sampling systems. MUS is normally used for testing accounts related to monetary assets.
The
a
Answer to Problem 9.23P
Sample size = 156
Explanation of Solution
Tolerable misstatement :$360,000
Expected misstatement :$90,000
Desired confidence level :95%
Recorded amount of accounts receivable: $9,000,000
Computation of Sample size:
When tolerable misstatement is 4% and the expected misstatement is 1% sample size can be determined using table 8-5 as 156.
Computation of sampling interval:
b
Introduction:
Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS): It is a method used to gauge the amount of misstatement in financials. MUS helps auditors to overcome difficulties in other sampling systems. MUS is normally used for testing accounts related to monetary assets.
The Upper misstatement limit UML for the following misstatements.
b
Answer to Problem 9.23P
UML for misstatement:
- $43,269
- $32,365
- $86,538
- $16,153
Explanation of Solution
To calculate UML first sampling interval is required
Tolerable misstatement :$360,000
Expected misstatement :$90,000
Desired confidence level :95%
Recorded amount of accounts receivable : $9,000,000
Sample size :156
Sampling interval :$57,692
Computation of UML:
Computation of tainting factor:
misstatements | Book value | Audit value | Difference | Tainting factorDifference ÷ book value |
1 | $10,000 | $7,500 | $2,500 | 0.25 |
2 | 9,000 | 6,000 | 3,000 | 0.33 |
3 | 60,000 | 0 | 60,000 | 1 |
4 | 800 | 640 | 160 | 0.2 |
Computation of Upper Misstatement limit:
Misstatement | Tainting Factor1 | Sampling interval2 | Projected Misstatement3(1 × 2) | 95% Misstatement Factor. 4 | UML5(3 × 4) |
1 | 0.25 | $57,692 | $14,423 | 3 | $43,269 |
2 | 0.33 | 57,692 | 19,038 | 1.7 | 32,365 |
3 | 1 | 57,692 | 57,692 | 1.5 | 86,538 |
4 | 0.2 | 57,692 | 11,538 | 1.4 | 16,153 |
Total | $102,691 | $178,325 |
The conclusion of whether inventory account balance is materially misstated is made by comparing the tolerable misstatement to the UML. As UML is $178,325 and it is less than the tolerable misstatement of $360,000, it can be concluded that the account balance is not materially misstated.
c
Introduction:
Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS): It is a method used to gauge the amount of misstatement in financials. MUS helps auditors to overcome difficulties in other sampling systems. MUS is normally used for testing accounts related to monetary assets.
The net projected population misstatement.
c
Answer to Problem 9.23P
Projected population misstatement is $6,750,000
Explanation of Solution
The projected population misstatement can be calculated by computing ratio of misstatements to total dollars sampled that is
misstatements | Book value | Audit value | Difference |
1 | $10,000 | $7,500 | $2,500 |
2 | 9,000 | 6,000 | 3,000 |
3 | 60,000 | 0 | 60,000 |
4 | 800 | 640 | 160 |
5 | 6,000 | 6,500 | -500 |
6 | 750 | 800 | -50 |
Total | 86,550 | 65,110 |
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
EBK AUDITING & ASSURANCE SERVICES: A SY
- How has AirBnb negatively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb negatively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb negatively affected homeowners and renters market? What happened to Airbnb in the Tax Dispute in Italy?arrow_forwardHow has AirBnb positively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb positively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb positively affected homeowners and renters market?arrow_forwardD. (1) Consider the following cash inflows of a financial product. Given that the market interest rate is 12%, what price would you pay for these cash flows? Year 0 1 2 3 4 Cash Flow 160 170 180 230arrow_forward
- Explain why financial institutions generally engage in foreign exchange tradingactivities. Provide specific purposes or motivations behind such activities.arrow_forwardA. In 2008, during the global financial crisis, Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks, collapsed and defaulted on its corporate bonds, causing significant losses for bondholders. This event highlighted several risks that investors in corporate bonds might face. What are the key risks an investor would encounter when investing in corporate bonds? Explain these risks with examples or academic references. [15 Marks]arrow_forwardTwo companies, Blue Plc and Yellow Plc, have bonds yielding 4% and 5.3%respectively. Blue Plc has a credit rating of AA, while Yellow Plc holds a BB rating. If youwere a risk-averse investor, which bond would you choose? Explain your reasoning withacademic references.arrow_forward
- B. Using the probabilities and returns listed below, calculate the expected return and standard deviation for Sparrow Plc and Hawk Plc, then justify which company a risk- averse investor might choose. Firm Sparrow Plc Hawk Plc Outcome Probability Return 1 50% 8% 2 50% 22% 1 30% 15% 2 70% 20%arrow_forward(2) Why are long-term bonds more susceptible to interest rate risk than short-term bonds? Provide examples to explain. [10 Marks]arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardScenario one: Under what circumstances would it be appropriate for a firm to use different cost of capital for its different operating divisions? If the overall firm WACC was used as the hurdle rate for all divisions, would the riskier division or the more conservative divisions tend to get most of the investment projects? Why? If you were to try to estimate the appropriate cost of capital for different divisions, what problems might you encounter? What are two techniques you could use to develop a rough estimate for each division’s cost of capital?arrow_forwardScenario three: If a portfolio has a positive investment in every asset, can the expected return on a portfolio be greater than that of every asset in the portfolio? Can it be less than that of every asset in the portfolio? If you answer yes to one of both of these questions, explain and give an example for your answer(s). Please Provide a Referencearrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning