![Economics:](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285859460/9781285859460_largeCoverImage.gif)
(a)
Y | C | I | G | X |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 |
The value of MPC.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 6E
Y | C | MPC |
$500 | $500 | |
$600 | $590 | 0.9 |
$700 | $680 | 0.9 |
$800 | $770 | 0.9 |
$900 | $860 | 0.9 |
$1000 | $950 | 0.9 |
Explanation of Solution
MPC =
Wherein, Change in Income =
Y | C | MPC |
$500 | $500 | |
$600 | $590 | 0.9 |
$700 | $680 | 0.9 |
$800 | $770 | 0.9 |
$900 | $860 | 0.9 |
$1000 | $950 | 0.9 |
MPC − The additional consumption resulting from an additional unit of income.
(b)
To write:
Y | C | I | G | X |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 |
The value of MPS.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 6E
The value of MPS is 0.10.
Explanation of Solution
Since income can only be either consumed or saved, therefore it can be written as
Y = C+S
Differentiating both sides with respect to Y
1 =
Thus, MPS =
In this case,
MPS =
MPS = 0.1
MPS − The additional savings arising out of an additional unit of income.
(c)
Y | C | I | G | X |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 |
The value of MPI.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 6E
Y | I |
$ 500 | $10 |
$600 | $10 |
$700 | $10 |
$800 | $10 |
$900 | $10 |
$1000 | $10 |
The MPI is zero.
Explanation of Solution
In this case, the investment is not changing with income level. It is fixed. Hence, the marginal propensity to invest is zero.
MPI − The additional investment arising out of an additional unit of income.
(d)
Y | C | I | G | X |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 |
The aggregate expenditure at each level of income.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 6E
Y | C | I | G | X | AE |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 | $590 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 | $660 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 | $730 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 | $800 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 | $870 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 | $940 |
Explanation of Solution
Aggregate expenditure at each level of income is consumption expenditure plus investment expenditure plus government expenditure and net exports.
Aggregate expenditure− The expenditure made by different sectors of the economy to goods and services and the net exports.
(e)
Y | C | I | G | X |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 |
The aggregate expenditure graphs.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 6E
Explanation of Solution
Aggregate Expenditure graph will be sloping upwards. This is due to the increase in level of aggregate expenditure.
Y | C | I | G | X | AE |
$ 500 | $500 | $10 | $20 | $60 | $590 |
$600 | $590 | $10 | $20 | $40 | $660 |
$700 | $680 | $10 | $20 | $20 | $730 |
$800 | $770 | $10 | $20 | $0 | $800 |
$900 | $860 | $10 | $20 | -$20 | $870 |
$1000 | $950 | $10 | $20 | -$40 | $940 |
Aggregate expenditure− The expenditure made by different sectors of the economy to goods and services and the net exports.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- The first question, the drop down options are: the US, Canada, and Mexico The second question, the drop down options are: the US, Canada, and Mexico The last two questions are explained in the photo.arrow_forwardcheck my answers, fix them if they are wrong. everything is in the picture. the drop down menus are either kansas or Illinois, except the last one which is yes or no.arrow_forwardeverything is in the imagearrow_forward
- everything is in the image!arrow_forwardRespond to isaiah Great day everyone and welcome to week 6! Every time we start to have fun, the government ruins it! The success of your business due to the strong economy explains why my spouse feels excited. The increase in interest rates may lead to a decline in new home demand. When mortgage rates rise they lead to higher costs which can discourage potential buyers and reduce demand in the housing market. The government increases interest rates as a measure to suppress inflation and stop the economy from growing too fast. Business expansion during this period presents significant risks. Before making significant investments it would be prudent to monitor how the market responds to the rate increase. Business expansion during a decline in demand for new homes could create financial difficulties.arrow_forwardPlace the labeled CS to represent the new consumer surplus in the market and the area labeled PS to represent producer surplusarrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardRespond to Luis Rodriguez I recommend Mrs. Ibrahim's proposal to lower interest rates as the more effective approach for fostering economic growth in Sudan. Sustainable Growth - Lowering interest rates encourages investment in productive capacity, which can lead to long-term economic growth rather than a temporary boost from cash transfers. Job Creation - This approach can create more stable employment opportunities by promoting business expansion through lower borrowing costs. Addressing Structural Issues - Lower interest rates can help address underlying structural issues in the economy, such as low production levels, by incentivizing businesses to invest in technology and infrastructure. Inflation Control - While there is a risk of inflation if appropriately managed, focusing on productive investments can help mitigate this risk compared to the potential inflationary effects of direct cash transfers. In conclusion, while both proposals have merit, Mrs. Ibrahim's approach of…arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285859460/9781285859460_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337617383/9781337617383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337617390/9781337617390_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337794985/9781337794985_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337613057/9781337613057_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337613040/9781337613040_smallCoverImage.gif)