Engineering Economic Analysis
Engineering Economic Analysis
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780190296902
Author: Donald G. Newnan, Ted G. Eschenbach, Jerome P. Lavelle
Publisher: Oxford University Press
bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 9, Problem 51P
To determine

(a)

The best alternative based on payback period.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 51P

The Alternative- B should be selected.

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Write the equation for Payback period.

Paybackperiod=CostAnnualBenefit ...... (I)

Calculate the Payback period for Alternative-A.

Substitute $50 for Cost, and $30 for Annual Benefit in Equation (I).

Paybackperiod=$50$30=1.67Years

Calculate the Payback period for Alternative-B.

Substitute $150 for Cost, and $45 for Annual Benefit in Equation (I).

Paybackperiod=$150$45=3.33Years

Calculate the Payback period for Alternative-C.

Substitute $110 for Cost, and $45 for Annual Benefit in Equation (I).

Paybackperiod=$110$45=2.44Years

The alternative that has minimum value of payback period should be selected.

Conclusion:

Therefore, the Alternative- B should be selected.

To determine

(b)

The best alternative based on future worth analysis.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 51P

The Alternative- B should be selected.

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Calculate the net future worth for alternative-A.

NFW=$30(FA,10%,3)$50(FP,10%,3) ...... (II)

Here, the net future worth is NFW, the future value is F, the Annual benefit is A and the initial cost is P.

Calculate the factor (FA,10%,3).

(FA,10%,3)=[(1+0.10)310.10]=3.31

Calculate the factor (FP,10%,3).

(FP,10%,3)=(1+0.10)3=1.331

Substitute $3.31 for (FA,10%,3), and 1.331 for (FP,10%,3) in Equation (II).

NFW=$30×3.31$50×1.331=$99.3$66.55=$32.75

Calculate the net future worth (NFW) for alternative-B.

NFW=$45(FA,10%,9)$150(FP,10%,9) ...... (III)

Calculate the factor (FA,10%,9).

(FA,10%,9)=[(1+0.10)910.10]=$13.58

Calculate the factor (FP,10%,9).

(FP,10%,9)=(1+0.10)9=2.36

Substitute $13.58 for (FA,10%,9), and 2.36 for (FP,10%,9) in Equation (III).

NFW=$45×13.58$150×2.36=$611.1$354=$257.1

Calculate the net future worth (NFW) for alternative-C.

NFW=$45(FA,10%,6)$110(FP,10%,6) ...... (IV)

Calculate the factor (FA,10%,6).

(FA,10%,6)=[(1+0.10)610.10]=$7.715

Calculate the factor (FP,10%,6).

(FP,10%,6)=(1+0.10)6=1.772

Substitute $7.715 for (FA,10%,6), and 1.772 for (FP,10%,6) in Equation (IV).

NFW=$45×7.715$110×1.772=$347.175$194.92=$152.255

The Alternative that has maximum value of future worth should be selected.

Conclusion:

Therefore, the Alternative- B should be selected.

To determine

(c)

The best alternative based on B/C ratio analysis.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 51P

The Alternative- C should be selected.

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Calculate the factor (PA,10%,3).

(PA,10%,3)=[(1+0.10)310.10(1+0.10)3]=2.49

Write the equation for B/C ratio.

B/Cratio=EUABEUAC ...... (V)

Calculate EUAB for Alternative-A.

EUAB=$30(PA,10%,5) ...... (VI).

Substitute 2.49 for (PA,10%,3) in Equation (VI).

EUAB=$30×2.49=$74.7

Calculate the B/C ratio for Alternative-A.

Substitute $74.7 for EUAB, and $50 for EUAC in Equation (V).

B/Cratio=$74.7$50=1.494

Calculate the factor (PA,10%,9).

(PA,10%,9)=[(1+0.10)910.10(1+0.10)9]=5.759

Write the Equation for B/C ratio.

B/Cratio=EUABEUAC ...... (VII)

Calculate EUAB for Alternative-B.

EUAB=$30(PA,10%,9) ...... (VIII).

Substitute 5.759 for (PA,10%,9) in Equation (VIII)

EUAB=$45×5.759=$259.155

Calculate the B/C ratio for Alternative-B.

Substitute $259.155 for EUAB, and $150 for EUAC in Equation (VII).

B/Cratio=$259.155$150=1.73

Calculate the factor (PA,10%,6).

(PA,10%,6)=[(1+0.10)610.10(1+0.10)6]=4.355

Write the Equation for B/C ratio.

B/Cratio=EUABEUAC ...... (IX)

Calculate EUAB for Alternative-B.

EUAB=$30(PA,10%,6) ...... (X).

Substitute 4.355 for (PA,10%,6) in Equation (X).

EUAB=$45×4.355=$195.975

Calculate the B/C ratio for Alternative-B.

Substitute $195.975 for EUAB, and $150 for EUAC in Equation (VII).

B/Cratio=$195.975$110=1.78.

Conclusion:

Therefore, the Alternative- C should be selected.

To determine

(d)

The reason behind the difference in answer in parts (a), (b), and (c).

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 51P

Explanation of Solution

In this case, there are three alternatives and rate of return accounts from 10%. Since, each alternative generates uniform annual benefits in excess of the cost, during the useful life and the payback period analysis ignores time value of money and only concentrates on time required to recover the investment. Therefore, payback period pertaining to each alternative is less than the alternative's useful life.

Since, least time is taken by alternative A for recovering the cost, however according to part (b), Alternative B is favorable for long-term economic efficiency and Alternative C is favorable according to part (c). Hence, it is ascertained that the answers in part (c), (a) and (b) differs from each other.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
If GDP goes up by 1% and the investment component of GDPgoes up by more than 1%, how is the investment share ofGDP changing in absolute terms?▶ In economics, what else is expressed as relative percentagechanges?
CEO Salary and Firm SalesWe can estimate a constant elasticity model relating CEO salary to firm sales. The data set is the same one used in Example 2.3, except we now relate salary to sales. Let sales be annual firm sales, measured in millions of dollars. A constant elasticity model is[2.45]ßßlog (salary) = ß0 + ß0log (sales) + u,where ß1 is the elasticity of salary with respect to sales. This model falls under the simple regression model by defining the dependent variable to be y = log(salary) and the independent variable to be x = log1sales2. Estimating this equation by OLS gives[2.46]log (salary)^=4.822 + 0.257 (sales)             n = 209, R2 = 0.211.The coefficient of log(sales) is the estimated elasticity of salary with respect to sales. It implies that a 1% increase in firm sales increases CEO salary by about 0.257%—the usual interpretation of an elasticity.
Solve

Chapter 9 Solutions

Engineering Economic Analysis

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Economics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Text book image
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Valuation Analysis in Project Finance Models - DCF & IRR; Author: Financial modeling;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDlQPJaFtCw;License: Standard Youtube License