a)
To evaluate the long run
a)
Explanation of Solution
Following is the average variable cost (AVC):
Total Variable cost (TVC)
Introduction: The long-run average cost (LRAC) curve shows the lowest cost per unit for the business at each output point, assuming all production factors are variable. The LRAC curve assumes the firm has selected the optimal mix of factors.
b)
To evaluate the long run marginal cost function for electricity generation.
b)
Explanation of Solution
Differentiating the total variable cost with respect to Q:
Introduction: Long-run marginal cost is an enterprise metric that represents the long-run average cost per unit of output, where all inputs are considered variable and the scale of production is variable. The long-run average cost curve displays the lowest overall cost for long-run generating a given production point.
c)
To evaluate the short run average variable cost and marginal cost functions for electricity generation while holding plant size constant at 150,000 kilowatts
c)
Explanation of Solution
Size of plant constant at 150,000 kilowatt and marginal cost:
Introduction: Average variable cost is the overall variable cost per unit of output incurred when a business participates in the manufacture of short runs. It can be observed in two ways. Because average variable cost is total variable cost per output unit, this can be detected by dividing total variable cost by output quantity.
d)
To evaluate the output level that minimizes short run average variable costs for a plant size equal to 150,000 kilowatts
d)
Explanation of Solution
On differentiating the short run average variable cost and equating it with zero:
Introduction: Average variable cost is the overall variable cost per unit of output incurred when a business participates in the manufacture of short runs. It can be observed in two ways. Because average variable cost is total variable cost per output unit, this can be detected by dividing total variable cost by output quantity.
d)
To evaluate the output level that minimizes short run average variable costs for a plant size equal to 150,000 kilowatts
d)
Explanation of Solution
Output that minimize the short run average variable cost:
Following is the average variable cost:
On differentiating the short run average variable cost and equating it with zero:
Introduction: Average variable cost is the overall variable cost per unit of output incurred when a business participates in the manufacture of short runs. It can be observed in two ways. Because average variable cost is total variable cost per output unit, this can be detected by dividing total variable cost by output quantity.
e)
To evaluate the short run average variable cost and marginal cost at the output level obtained in part (d).
e)
Explanation of Solution
Short run average cost:
Introduction: Average variable cost is the overall variable cost per unit of output incurred when a business participates in the manufacture of short runs. It can be observed in two ways. Because average variable cost is total variable cost per output unit, this can be detected by dividing total variable cost by output quantity.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning