A law enforcement officer, by using a special kind of software, found out that a person possesses child pornography. The officer, with the help of the information provided by the company MC about its subscriber, visited the residence of the person R and found the videos related to child pornography. To find: The person R has a privacy interest in information that was obtained by subpoenas issued to the company MC.

Question

Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 3BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:A law enforcement officer, by using a special kind of software, found out that a person possesses child pornography. The officer, with the help of the information provided by the company MC about its subscriber, visited the residence of the person R and found the videos related to child pornography.

To find:The person R has a privacy interest in information that was obtained by subpoenas issued to the company MC.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?

11) Non-compliance with the provisions of the Privacy Act, Canada, is first monitored by a. the federal Privacy Commissioner. b. the courts. c. the Privacy Commissioner of the province in which the individual whose information is disclosed resides. d. the executive branch of the federal government. e. the Commissioner of Intergovernmental Affairs. 12) A breach of the provisions of the Ontario Freedom of Information and Privacy Act can result in a. a reprimand of the Ontario government by the Premier of Ontario. b. liability in damages for the provincial crown. c. a reprimand of the Ontario government by an Ontario high court. d. only a finding that the Ontario Statute has been breached. e. both a finding that the Ontario Statute has been breached and a reprimand by the Premier of Ontario. 13) Privacy legislation covering municipalities puts enforcement of a breach of privacy by municipal governments in the hands of a. the particular municipal Privacy…

On a recent trip to Hongkong, Brian Santos, sales manager of Micro- electronic Devices, took his wife at company expense. Erika Tan, vice- president of sales and Santos' boss, thought his travel and entertainment expenses seemed excessive. Tan approved the reimbursement, however, because she owed Santos a favor. Tan, well aware that the company president routinely reviewed all expenses recorded in the cash disbursements journal, had the accountant record Santos' wife's expenses in the general journal as follows: Sales Promotion Expense 35,000 Cash 35,000 What is the ethical issue in this situation? What role does accounting play in the ethical issue?