Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

5. Download the Excel sheet from Brightspace. The data contains the GDP per capita and GNI per capita of OECD member countries in 2014 (both figures are reported in US dollars). The countries are ranked by GDP per capita. a. Compute the ratio of GNI to GDP for each country (GNI per capita/GDP per capita). What does this imply about net factor income from abroad for each country? b. Rank the countries based on the GNI/GDP ratio, starting with the country with the highest ratio and ending with the country with the lowest ratio. Which country has the highest ratio, and which has the lowest? c. Comment on why the countries you identified in the previous question have a large difference between GDP and GNI? What does the difference imply?

3. Answer the following questions about external wealth. a. Home has external wealth of $100 million in period t. In t+1, Home purchases $160 million foreign assets, and Foreign purchases $120 million in Home assets. Assume a world interest rate of 10% per annum. Compute the "change" in external wealth at t+1 for Home. b. A country's external wealth was -$1.5 billion at the end of 2015, and its trade balance was $750 million in 2016. Assume the world interest rate is 5% per annum. What is the "value" of a country's external wealth at the end of 2016?

1. The table below shows a country's hypothetical national income and product accounts data. Category Consumption (personal consumption expenditures) Investment (gross private domestic investment) Government consumption (government expenditures) Exports Imports Net Factor Income from Abroad Net unilateral transfers Billions of Dollars 8,000 1,300 2,100 900 1,750 +45 -20 a. Compute the following accounts using the information in the table: Gross national expenditure (GNE) . Trade balance (TB) • Gross domestic product (GDP) • Gross national income (GNI) . Gross national disposable income (GNDI) Current account (CA) b. Derive the current account identity using the national income identity. Are savings greater than or smaller than investment in this country? The national income identity is: GNDIGNE + CA, GNE = C + G + I.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 6

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 7

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.