Concept explainers
(a)
To determine:
To set the spreadsheet for calculating the relative strength of the banking sector compared to the broad market.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 26PS
The spreadsheet is obtained and given in explanation.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data given in the website. The initial value of the sector index and S&P 500 Index is equal to 100. Each week's
The data was downloaded from the given website.
| Week | SPY rate | FSRBX rate |
| 2013.01 | 1.64 | 1.75 |
| 2013.02 | 0.17 | 0.55 |
| 2013.03 | -0.82 | -0.92 |
| 2013.04 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
| 2013.05 | 0.59 | 0.92 |
| 2013.06 | -0.21 | -0.08 |
| 2013.07 | 0.12 | 1.37 |
| 2013.08 | 1.19 | 1.80 |
| 2013.09 | -3.27 | -2.73 |
| 2013.10 | -1.00 | -0.58 |
| 2013.11 | -0.03 | -0.87 |
| 2013.12 | 3.25 | 1.09 |
| 2013.13 | -0.23 | -0.21 |
| 2013.14 | -0.47 | -3.37 |
| 2013.15 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
| 2013.16 | -2.97 | -1.55 |
| 2013.17 | -0.91 | -1.75 |
| 2013.18 | 0.07 | 0.40 |
| 2013.19 | -0.20 | 1.11 |
| 2013.20 | 2.77 | 2.50 |
| 2013.21 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| 2013.22 | 1.21 | 0.38 |
| 2013.23 | -0.27 | -0.89 |
| 2013.24 | 0.19 | 0.52 |
| 2013.25 | -0.85 | -0.17 |
| 2013.26 | -1.02 | -1.16 |
| 2013.27 | -0.92 | 0.04 |
| 2013.28 | -1.57 | 0.04 |
| 2013.29 | 1.72 | 0.95 |
| 2013.30 | -3.60 | -1.97 |
| 2013.31 | 0.32 | 0.83 |
| 2013.32 | 3.07 | 3.47 |
| 2013.33 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| 2013.34 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| 2013.35 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
| 2013.36 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
| 2013.37 | -1.49 | -1.72 |
| 2013.38 | 1.96 | 2.08 |
| 2013.39 | -1.00 | 0.16 |
| 2013.40 | -1.11 | -0.37 |
| 2013.41 | -1.13 | -1.51 |
| 2013.42 | 2.91 | 3.28 |
| 2013.43 | 3.61 | 2.73 |
| 2013.44 | 1.29 | 1.60 |
| 2013.45 | -0.86 | -2.16 |
| 2013.46 | 0.79 | 1.18 |
| 2013.47 | 0.76 | 0.19 |
| 2013.48 | 0.06 | -0.19 |
| 2013.49 | 0.57 | 0.04 |
| 2013.50 | 1.11 | 1.83 |
| 2013.51 | 0.08 | -0.15 |
| 2013.52 | -2.01 | -2.22 |
| 2014.01 | -0.17 | -1.56 |
| 2014.02 | -1.24 | 0.16 |
| 2014.03 | 0.56 | -0.28 |
| 2014.04 | 2.38 | 2.74 |
| 2014.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
| 2014.06 | -0.32 | -2.45 |
| 2014.07 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
| 2014.08 | 1.07 | 1.63 |
| 2014.09 | -1.91 | -1.87 |
| 2014.10 | -1.15 | -1.23 |
| 2014.11 | -1.18 | -2.58 |
| 2014.12 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| 2014.13 | 0.48 | 0.66 |
| 2014.14 | -3.26 | -2.29 |
| 2014.15 | 1.24 | 0.75 |
| 2014.16 | 0.16 | 1.54 |
| 2014.17 | 1.15 | 0.78 |
| 2014.18 | -1.17 | -1.30 |
| 2014.19 | 2.93 | 3.13 |
| 2014.20 | 0.96 | -0.52 |
| 2014.21 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
| 2014.22 | 0.05 | -0.04 |
| 2014.23 | 1.37 | 1.65 |
| 2014.24 | -1.96 | -1.07 |
| 2014.25 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
| 2014.26 | 1.49 | 1.19 |
| 2014.27 | 1.26 | 1.65 |
| 2014.28 | 0.57 | 0.35 |
| 2014.29 | 0.16 | -0.92 |
| 2014.30 | -0.69 | -1.24 |
| 2014.31 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
| 2014.32 | -0.47 | 0.39 |
| 2014.33 | -1.39 | -1.92 |
| 2014.34 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
| 2014.35 | 1.91 | 0.63 |
| 2014.36 | -0.46 | 0.08 |
| 2014.37 | -1.67 | -2.36 |
| 2014.38 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| 2014.39 | -2.79 | -1.73 |
| 2014.40 | -0.78 | 0.04 |
| 2014.41 | -0.45 | 1.02 |
| 2014.42 | 1.41 | 2.23 |
| 2014.43 | 1.93 | 1.03 |
| 2014.44 | 1.35 | 3.02 |
| 2014.45 | 1.10 | -0.19 |
| 2014.46 | 1.60 | 1.72 |
| 2014.47 | -0.22 | -0.68 |
| 2014.48 | -0.41 | -0.38 |
| 2014.49 | 0.55 | 0.72 |
| 2014.50 | 0.31 | 0.19 |
| 2014.51 | -1.77 | -1.73 |
| 2014.52 | 3.15 | 2.41 |
| 2015.01 | 0.19 | -0.52 |
| 2015.02 | -2.10 | -2.89 |
| 2015.03 | 2.04 | 2.59 |
| 2015.04 | -1.76 | -1.81 |
| 2015.05 | 0.29 | 0.81 |
| 2015.06 | 1.72 | 1.71 |
| 2015.07 | 0.47 | 1.35 |
| 2015.08 | -0.50 | -1.07 |
| 2015.09 | -0.13 | 0.07 |
| 2015.1 | 1.99 | 2.13 |
| 2015.11 | -0.32 | -0.51 |
| 2015.12 | -0.29 | -0.66 |
| 2015.13 | -0.23 | -0.04 |
| 2015.14 | -0.64 | -0.41 |
| 2015.15 | 1.90 | 1.37 |
| 2015.16 | 0.24 | 3.11 |
| 2015.17 | 0.80 | 0.57 |
| 2015.18 | -2.48 | -2.76 |
| 2015.19 | -1.66 | -1.49 |
| 2015.2 | 1.01 | 0.59 |
| 2015.21 | 0.48 | 1.06 |
| 2015.22 | -2.83 | -0.80 |
| 2015.23 | -0.12 | -1.72 |
| 2015.24 | -0.17 | -1.60 |
| 2015.25 | 2.29 | 2.08 |
| 2015.26 | -0.53 | -0.11 |
| 2015.27 | -2.44 | -1.30 |
| 2015.28 | 0.34 | 2.67 |
| 2015.29 | 3.25 | 2.31 |
| 2015.3 | 0.17 | 0.72 |
| 2015.31 | -0.93 | -1.99 |
| 2015.32 | 2.89 | 1.88 |
| 2015.33 | -0.67 | -1.14 |
| 2015.34 | 1.23 | 0.54 |
| 2015.35 | -0.86 | -0.54 |
| 2015.36 | 1.73 | 1.80 |
| 2015.37 | -0.38 | -0.25 |
| 2015.38 | 1.61 | 0.78 |
| 2015.39 | 1.08 | 0.67 |
| 2015.4 | 1.20 | 0.87 |
| 2015.41 | 0.15 | -1.21 |
| 2015.42 | 0.78 | 0.28 |
| 2015.43 | -1.00 | -1.01 |
| 2015.44 | 1.25 | 1.62 |
| 2015.45 | 1.58 | 0.28 |
| 2015.46 | -0.05 | -0.62 |
| 2015.47 | -0.09 | -0.49 |
| 2015.48 | 0.85 | 1.12 |
| 2015.49 | 0.65 | 2.04 |
| 2015.5 | -1.11 | 0.03 |
| 2015.51 | 0.62 | 0.34 |
| 2015.52 | -0.76 | -0.74 |
| 2016.01 | 1.92 | 0.34 |
| 2016.02 | -0.29 | -0.65 |
| 2016.03 | -0.48 | -0.27 |
| 2016.04 | 1.88 | 1.78 |
| 2016.05 | -0.60 | -0.20 |
| 2016.06 | 1.24 | 1.82 |
| 2016.07 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
| 2016.08 | -4.57 | -4.10 |
| 2016.09 | 1.52 | 0.35 |
| 2016.1 | -1.21 | -1.77 |
| 2016.11 | 3.51 | 3.45 |
| 2016.12 | -0.97 | -2.21 |
| 2016.13 | 1.58 | -0.31 |
| 2016.14 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
| 2016.15 | 2.27 | 3.50 |
| 2016.16 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
| 2016.17 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| 2016.18 | -0.03 | 0.34 |
| 2016.19 | 1.16 | 0.60 |
| 2016.2 | -0.61 | -0.97 |
| 2016.21 | 1.57 | 0.84 |
| 2016.22 | -1.97 | -2.20 |
| 2016.23 | 1.78 | 1.47 |
| 2016.24 | -1.64 | -2.55 |
| 2016.25 | -0.08 | -0.41 |
| 2016.26 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
| 2016.27 | 1.22 | 0.24 |
| 2016.28 | -0.87 | -3.31 |
| 2016.29 | -5.46 | -5.40 |
| 2016.3 | -0.90 | -4.03 |
| 2016.31 | 0.63 | 5.80 |
| 2016.32 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
| 2016.33 | 2.51 | 0.07 |
| 2016.34 | -0.50 | -1.49 |
| 2016.35 | -1.03 | -2.52 |
| 2016.36 | 1.94 | 1.66 |
| 2016.37 | 2.55 | 2.50 |
| 2016.38 | 0.40 | -1.74 |
| 2016.39 | 2.14 | 4.61 |
| 2016.4 | 0.31 | -2.58 |
| 2016.41 | -4.26 | -7.57 |
| 2016.42 | 2.63 | 2.98 |
| 2016.43 | -1.57 | -6.13 |
| 2016.44 | -4.01 | -2.14 |
| 2016.45 | 0.45 | -1.90 |
| 2016.46 | -1.14 | -2.72 |
| 2016.47 | 3.15 | 5.34 |
| 2016.48 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
| 2016.49 | -2.48 | -6.53 |
| 2016.5 | 1.18 | 1.08 |
| 2016.51 | -0.56 | -1.15 |
| 2016.52 | -4.06 | -6.69 |
| 2017.01 | -0.82 | 0.56 |
| 2017.02 | -5.77 | -7.23 |
| 2017.03 | 0.75 | 10.91 |
| 2017.04 | 4.91 | 7.74 |
| 2017.05 | -4.67 | -6.93 |
| 2017.06 | 1.56 | -1.07 |
| 2017.07 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
| 2017.08 | -1.32 | -5.12 |
| 2017.09 | -3.08 | -6.53 |
| 2017.1 | -0.07 | 1.77 |
| 2017.11 | 2.41 | 11.69 |
| 2017.12 | -0.43 | -7.26 |
| 2017.13 | 4.09 | 3.60 |
| 2017.14 | -2.56 | -4.91 |
| 2017.15 | 3.82 | 4.78 |
| 2017.16 | 0.81 | 2.42 |
| 2017.17 | 1.37 | 1.95 |
| 2017.18 | -1.85 | -4.99 |
| 2017.19 | 2.70 | 1.13 |
| 2017.2 | -3.52 | -4.13 |
| 2017.21 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
| 2017.22 | -2.89 | -7.05 |
| 2017.23 | -0.11 | -4.31 |
| 2017.24 | -2.87 | -4.07 |
| 2017.25 | -3.08 | -4.19 |
| 2017.26 | -0.96 | -4.67 |
| 2017.27 | -1.95 | -6.75 |
| 2017.28 | 1.72 | 12.69 |
| 2017.29 | -0.40 | 1.30 |
| 2017.3 | 0.55 | 7.63 |
| 2017.31 | 2.54 | 1.03 |
| 2017.32 | 0.62 | -1.55 |
| 2017.33 | -0.40 | -3.05 |
| 2017.34 | -0.66 | 3.25 |
| 2017.35 | -3.40 | 3.86 |
| 2017.36 | 1.35 | 2.30 |
| 2017.37 | -0.99 | 10.94 |
| 2017.38 | -2.63 | -10.46 |
| 2017.39 | -8.70 | -5.66 |
| 2017.4 | -19.79 | -18.66 |
| 2017.41 | 5.33 | 9.99 |
| 2017.42 | -6.63 | -7.68 |
| 2017.43 | 11.25 | 13.61 |
| 2017.44 | -3.07 | -8.20 |
| 2017.45 | -7.71 | -6.40 |
| 2017.46 | -8.19 | -20.03 |
| 2017.47 | 13.29 | 25.04 |
| 2017.48 | -2.39 | -0.34 |
| 2017.49 | 1.20 | -6.79 |
| 2017.5 | -0.09 | 2.69 |
| 2017.51 | -1.17 | -2.55 |
| 2017.52 | 6.66 | -0.29 |
The graph of the relative strength for S&P 500 and FB is plotted as shown below.
Using the price movements and their changing speed, the relative strength of the fund against the S&P 500 can be measured.
(b)
To determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio exceeds by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial increase the banking sector outperforms S&P500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 26PS
As per the data, 16 times the relative strength increases more than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 16 times when the relative strength increases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here, it is seen that 10 times the FSRBX underperformed the S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
There are 6 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
(c)
Requirement 3 To Determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio decreases by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial decrease the banking sector outperforms S&P 500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P 500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 26PS
As per the data, 31 times the relative strength moves decrease by greater than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 31 times when the relative strength decreases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here it is seen that 17 times the FSRBX underperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
There are 14 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
(d)
Requirement 4 To Determine:
To determine how well the relative strength rule functions in identifying the selling or buying opportunities.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 26PS
The data above gives the bullish sign and the bearish sign.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
We can see the relative strength depicted in second part of requirement as bullish sign. Here the FB fund is likely to underperform the S&P 500 index than to perform better than the index according to this signal.
We can see the relative strength depicted in third part of requirement as bearish sign. Here the FB fund did not give a better performance than the index but there is no statistical difference succeeding the considerable change in the relative strength. There is random successive performance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
ESSENTIALS OF INVESTMENTS>LL<+CONNECT
- Eccles Inc., a zero-growth firm, has an expected EBIT of $100.000 and a corporate tax rate of 30%. Eccles uses $500,000 of 12.0% debt, and the cost of equity to an unlevered firm in the same risk class is 16.0%. What is the firm's cost of equity according to MM with corporate taxes? Ο 32.0% Ο 25.9% Ο 21.0% Ο 28.8% Ο 23.3%arrow_forwardP&L Corporation wants to sell some 20-year, annual interest, $1,000 par value bonds. Its stock sells for $42 per share, and each bond would have 75 warrants attached to it each exercisable into one share of stock at an exercise price of $47. The firm's straight bonds yield 10%. Each warrant is expected to have a market value of $2.00 given that the stock sells for $42. What coupon interest rate must the company set on the bonds in order to sell the bonds with-warrants at par? a. 9.54% b. 8.65% c. 9.08% d. 8.24% e. 83%arrow_forwardPotter & Lopez Inc. just sold a bond with 50 warrants attached. The bonds have a 20-year maturity and an annual coupon of 12%, and they were issued at their $1,000 par value. The current yield on similar straight bonds is 15%. What is the implied value of each warrant? Ο $4.35 O $3.76 O $4.56 O $4.14 O $3.94arrow_forward
- If a firm adheres strictly to the residual dividend policy, the issuance of new common stock would suggest that The dividend payout ratio is decreasing. The dividend payout ratio has remained constant. The dollar amount of investments has decreased. No dividends were paid during the year. the dividend payout ratio is increasing.arrow_forwardq6) Which of the following statements is CORRECT? If Congress increases taxes on capital gains but leaves tax rates on dividends unchanged, this will motivate companies to increase stock repurchases. The clientele effect explains why firms change their dividend policies so often.. One advantage of the residual dividend policy is that it helps corporations to develop a specific and well-identified dividend clientele. If a firm splits its stock 2-for-1, then its stock price will be doubled. If a firm follows the residual dividend policy, then a sudden increase in the number of profitable projects is likely to reduce the firm's dividend payout.arrow_forwardAmold Rossiter is a 40-year-old employee of the Barrington Company who will retire at age 60 and expects to live to age 75. The firm has promised a retirement income of $20.000 at the end of each year following retirement until death. The firm's pension fund is expected to earn 7 percent annually on its assets and the firm uses 7% to discount pension benefits. What is Barrington's annual pension contribution to the nearest dollar for Mr. Rossiter? (Assume certainty and end-of-year cash flows. a. $3,642 b.$4,443 c. $4,967 d.$5,491 e.$2,756arrow_forward
- Morales Publishing's tax rate is 40%, its beta is 1.10, and it uses no debt. However, the CFO is considering moving to a capital structure with 30% debt and 70% equity. If the risk free rate is 5.0% and the market risk premium is 6.0%, by how much would the capital structure shift change the firm's cost of equity? Ο 1.53% Ο 2.05% Ο 1.70% Ο 1.87% O 2.26%arrow_forwardThe common stock of Southern Airlines currently sells for $33, and its 8% convertible debentures (issued at par, or $1,000) sell for $850. Each debenture can be converted into 25 shares of common stock at any time before 2025. What is the conversion value of the bond? a. $825.00 b.$866.25 c. $744.56 d. $783.75 e. $707.33arrow_forwardBailey and Sons has a levered beta of 1.10, its capital structure consists of 40% debt and 60% equity, and its tax rate is 40%. What would Bailey's beta be if it used no debt, i.e., what is its unlevered beta? a. 0.79 b. 0.71 c. 0.67 d. 0.64 e. 0.75arrow_forward
- Eccles Inc., a zero-growth firm, has an expected EBIT of $100.000 and a corporate tax rate of 30%. Eccles uses $500,000 of 12.0% debt, and the cost of equity to an unlevered firm in the same risk class is 16.0%. What is the value of the firm according to MM with corporate taxes? a. $710,875 b. $587,500 c. $646,250 d. $475,875 e. $528,750arrow_forwardMikkleson Mining stock is selling for $40 per share and has an expected dividend in the coming year of $2.00 and has an expected constant growth rate of 5%. The company is considering issuing a 10-year convertible bond that would be priced at $1,000 par value. The bonds would have an 8% annual coupon, and each bond could be converted into 20 shares of common stock. The required rate of return on an otherwise similar nonconvertible bond is 10.00%. What is the estimated floor price of the convertible at the end of Year 3? a. $926.10 b. $794.01 c. $835.81 d. $879.80 $972.41arrow_forwardMs. Lloyd, who is 25 and expects to retire at age 60, has just been hired by the Chambers Corporation. Ms. Lloyd's current salary is $30,000 per year, but her wages are expected to increase by 5 percent annually over the next 35 years. The firm has a defined benefit pension plan in which workers receive 2 percent of their final year's wages for each year of employment. Assume a world of certainty. Further, assume that all payments occur at year-end. What is Ms. Lloyd's expected annual retirement benefit, rounded to the nearest thousands of dollars? a. $116,000 b. $35,000 c. $89,000 d. $57,000 e. $132,000arrow_forward
Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education