Why do we hybtidize atomic orbitals to explain the bonding in covalent compounds? What type of bonds form from hybrid orbitals: sigma or pi? Explain.
Interpretation: A reason corresponding to the hybridizing of atomic orbitals to explain the bonding in covalent compounds is to be stated. The type of bonds that are formed from hybrid orbitals is to be stated.
Concept introduction: Hybrid orbitals are formed by mixing of atomic orbitals when superimposed on each other in various proportions Hybrid orbitals having same energies are suitable for pairing of electrons which leads to the formation of chemical bond. Both sigma and pi bonds are formed from hybrid atomic orbital.
To determine: A reason corresponding to the hybridizing of atomic orbitals to explain the bonding in covalent compounds and the type of bonds that are formed from hybrid orbitals.
Answer to Problem 1RQ
Due to difference between the predicted structure and the experimental structure, it is rationalized that a new set of atomic orbitals is required which result from hybridization. If there is a “head to head” overlap of orbitals then sigma bond is formed and if there is a “side to side” overlap then pi bonds are formed.
Explanation of Solution
Hybrid orbitals are formed by mixing of atomic orbitals when superimposed on each other in various proportions. Hybridized orbitals are used in the formation of covalent compounds.
Due to discrepancy between the predicted structure and the experimental structure, a new set of atomic orbitals are used, commonly known as hybrid orbitals, which are required to explain the bonding structure.
During the formation of hybrid orbitals both type of bonds, sigma and pi, are formed.
Sigma bonds and pi bonds are formed by overlap of atomic orbitals.
Sigma bond is formed when there is a “head to head” overlap of orbitals and pi bond is formed when there is a “side to side” overlap.
Formation of sigma bond is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Formation of pi bond is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Hybrid orbitals are formed by mixing of atomic orbitals when superimposed on each other in various proportions.
During the formation of hybrid orbitals both type of bonds, sigma and pi, are formed
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Bundle: Chemistry, 9th, Loose-Leaf + OWLv2 24-Months Printed Access Card
- b. Please complete the zig-zag conformation of the compound (3R,4S)-3,4-dichloro-2,5-dimethylhexane by writing the respective atoms in the boxes. 4arrow_forwardc. Serricornin, the female-produced sex pheromone of the cigarette beetle, has the following structure. OH What is the maximum number of possible stereoisomers? Is this structure a meso compound? d. Please consider the natural product alkaloids shown below. Are these two structures enantiomers, diastereomers or conformers? H HO H H HN HO HN R R с R=H cinchonidine R=ET cinchonine Harrow_forwardNail polish remover containing acetone was spilled in a room 5.23 m × 3.28 m × 2.76 m. Measurements indicated that 2,250 mg of acetone evaporated. Calculate the acetone concentration in micrograms per cubic meter.arrow_forward
- Please help me answer number 1. 1. If your graphs revealed a mathematical relationship between specific heat and atomic mass, write down an equation for the relationship. I also don't understand, is the equation from the line regression the one that I'm suppose use to show the relationship? If so could you work it all the way out?arrow_forwardDescribe the principle of resonance and give a set of Lewis Structures to illustrate your explanation.arrow_forwardDon't used hand raitingarrow_forward
- It is not unexpected that the methoxyl substituent on a cyclohexane ring prefers to adopt the equatorial conformation. OMe H A G₂ = +0.6 kcal/mol OMe What is unexpected is that the closely related 2-methoxytetrahydropyran prefers the axial conformation: H H OMe OMe A Gp=-0.6 kcal/mol Methoxy: CH3O group Please be specific and clearly write the reason why this is observed. This effect that provides stabilization of the axial OCH 3 group in this molecule is called the anomeric effect. [Recall in the way of example, the staggered conformer of ethane is more stable than eclipsed owing to bonding MO interacting with anti-bonding MO...]arrow_forward206 Pb 82 Express your answers as integers. Enter your answers separated by a comma. ▸ View Available Hint(s) VAΣ ΜΕ ΑΣΦ Np, N₁ = 82,126 Submit Previous Answers ? protons, neutronsarrow_forwardPlease draw the inverted chair forms of the products for the two equilibrium reactions shown below. Circle the equilibrium reaction that would have a AG = 0, i.e., the relative energy of the reactant (to the left of the equilibrium arrows) equals the relative energy of the product? [No requirement to show or do calculations.] CH3 CH3 HH CH3 1 -CH3arrow_forward
- 5. Please consider the Newman projection of tartaric acid drawn below as an eclipsed conformer (1). Please draw the most stable conformer and two intermediate energy conformers noting that staggered conformers are lower in energy than eclipsed forms even if the staggered conformers have gauche relationships between groups. [Draw the substituents H and OH on the front carbons and H, OH and CO₂H on the back carbons based on staggered forms. -CO₂H is larger than -OH.] OH COH ICOOH COOH COOH 1 2 COOH COOH 3 4 Staggered Staggered Staggered (most stable) Indicate the number of each conformer above (1, 2, 3 and 4) that corresponds to the relative energies below. Ref=0 Rotation 6. (60 points) a. Are compounds 1 and 2 below enantiomers, diastereomers or identical? OH OH HO HO LOH HO HO OH 2 OH OH b. Please complete the zig-zag conformation of the compound (3R,4S)-3,4-dichloro-2,5-dimethylhexane by writing the respective atoms in the boxes. 3.arrow_forwardThe plutonium isotope with 144 neutrons Enter the chemical symbol of the isotope.arrow_forwardThe mass ratio of sodium to fluorine in sodium fluoride is 1.21:1. A sample of sodium fluoride produced 26.1 gg of sodium upon decomposition. How much fluorine was formed?arrow_forward
- Chemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry for Engineering StudentsChemistryISBN:9781337398909Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom HolmePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Matter and ChangeChemistryISBN:9780078746376Author:Dinah Zike, Laurel Dingrando, Nicholas Hainen, Cheryl WistromPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub CoChemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage Learning