Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Please answer questions D-H, I have already answered A , B,C but it may help you to still solve them yourself. Thank you!

2. A firm’s production function is given by:Q = 10KLThe unit capital and labour costs are 2 and 1 pounds respectively. The firm is contracted to produce2000 units.(a) Write out the optimisation problem of the firm. (b) Express this problem using a Lagrangian function. (c) Find values of K and L which fulfil the contract with minimal cost to the firm. (d) Calculate the total cost to the firm.

3. Consider the following estimated regression equation, estimated using a sample of firms, where RDis total firm spending on research and development in USD ($), Revenue is total firm revenuein USD ($), and W ages is the firms’ total spending on wages in USD ($) (standard errors inparentheses):RDd = 1000(600)+ 0.5(0.1)Revenue + 1.5(0.5)W ages,(a) Interpret the coefficients on each of the explanatory variables. (b) Which of the three coefficients are statistically significant at the 5% level of significance? Howdo you know? A researcher runs a two-sided statistical test of the null hypothesis that both the coefficients onthe explanatory variables above are jointly equal to 0.25 (mathematically, that β1 = β2 = 0.25),and reports a p-value of 0.045.(c) What does this p-value mean for the outcome of the test? (d) What would an appropriate two-sided alternative hypothesis look like?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Answer 6

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Trade barrier: Trade barriers refer to the government-induced restrictions imposed usually on international trade.

Answer 7

Chapter 9, Problem 1FT

To determine

Trade barrier and theory of trade.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

By removing the trade barriers, Japanese consumers would be better off, whereas the Japanese rice farmers would be worse off. The net gain would be positive according to the theory of trade; Japanese consumers would be better off than Japanese producers (who would be worse off). By the theory of politics, Japanese rice farmers would be lobbying against the reduction in trade barriers than consumers who would be favoring the reduction in barriers. The gains received per consumer are comparatively lower than the losses to producers. Thus, the producers will have a greater incentive to lobby against reductions in trade barriers.