The wave nature of matter was first proposed by Louis de Broglie, who suggested the wavelength (l) of a particle was related to its mass ( m ) and its velocity ( n ) by the equation: λ = h / m v where h is Planck’s constant ( 6.626 × 10 − 34 J ⋅ s ) . Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of: (a) a 0.0459 kg golf ball traveling at 95 m/s; (b) an electron traveling 3.88 × 10 6 m / s . Can you explain why the wave nature of matter is significant is significant for the electron but not for the golf ball? ( Hint: Express mass in kilograms.)
The wave nature of matter was first proposed by Louis de Broglie, who suggested the wavelength (l) of a particle was related to its mass ( m ) and its velocity ( n ) by the equation: λ = h / m v where h is Planck’s constant ( 6.626 × 10 − 34 J ⋅ s ) . Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of: (a) a 0.0459 kg golf ball traveling at 95 m/s; (b) an electron traveling 3.88 × 10 6 m / s . Can you explain why the wave nature of matter is significant is significant for the electron but not for the golf ball? ( Hint: Express mass in kilograms.)
Solution Summary: The author explains that the de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the product of mass and velocity.
The wave nature of matter was first proposed by Louis de Broglie, who suggested the wavelength (l) of a particle was related to its mass (m) and its velocity (n) by the equation:
λ
=
h
/
m
v
where h is Planck’s constant
(
6.626
×
10
−
34
J
⋅
s
)
. Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of: (a) a 0.0459 kg golf ball traveling at 95 m/s; (b) an electron traveling
3.88
×
10
6
m
/
s
.
Can you explain why the wave nature of matter is significant is significant for the electron but not for the golf ball? (Hint: Express mass in kilograms.)
If we assume a system with an anodic overpotential, the variation of n as a function
of current density:
1. at low fields is linear 2. at higher fields, it follows Tafel's law
Obtain the range of current densities for which the overpotential has the same value
when calculated for 1 and 2 cases (maximum relative difference of 5% compared to
the behavior for higher fields).
To which overpotential range does this correspond?
Data: i = 1.5 mA cm², T = 300°C, B = 0.64, R = 8.314 J K1 mol-1 and F = 96485 C mol-1.
Answer by equation please
Some of the theories used to describe interface structure can be distinguished by:1. the measured potential difference.2. the distribution of ions in solution.3. the calculation of charge density.4. the external Helmoltz plane.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell
The Bohr Model of the atom and Atomic Emission Spectra: Atomic Structure tutorial | Crash Chemistry; Author: Crash Chemistry Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apuWi_Fbtys;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY