In Problem 6.107, a theoretical flow rate of water to a village was calculated without any consideration of line losses. In Problem 7.50, an assumed value of 2.8 m was included as an estimate for losses in the line and the resulting flow rate was only 6.22 x 10 − 4 m 3 / s . Now rework the problem and determine the actual losses that would occur. Use 25°C water running in a flexible smooth tube that is 1200 m long and has the same 20 -mm diameter. Let's check the assumed value for losses now. Using a flow rate of 6.22 x 10 − 4 m 3 / s , what would be the actual losses? What conclusions can we draw about the original proposal to install this line? Why is the calculation of losses so important?
In Problem 6.107, a theoretical flow rate of water to a village was calculated without any consideration of line losses. In Problem 7.50, an assumed value of 2.8 m was included as an estimate for losses in the line and the resulting flow rate was only 6.22 x 10 − 4 m 3 / s . Now rework the problem and determine the actual losses that would occur. Use 25°C water running in a flexible smooth tube that is 1200 m long and has the same 20 -mm diameter. Let's check the assumed value for losses now. Using a flow rate of 6.22 x 10 − 4 m 3 / s , what would be the actual losses? What conclusions can we draw about the original proposal to install this line? Why is the calculation of losses so important?
Solution Summary: The author explains Reynolds number, velocity, diameter, kinematic viscosity, and cross-section area of the pipe.
In Problem 6.107, a theoretical flow rate of water to a village was calculated without any consideration of line losses. In Problem 7.50, an assumed value of
2.8
m was included as an estimate for losses in the line and the resulting flow rate was only
6.22
x
10
−
4
m
3
/
s
. Now rework the problem and determine the actual losses that would occur. Use 25°C water running in a flexible smooth tube that is
1200
m long and has the same
20
-mm diameter. Let's check the assumed value for losses now. Using a flow rate of
6.22
x
10
−
4
m
3
/
s
, what would be the actual losses? What conclusions can we draw about the original proposal to install this line? Why is the calculation of losses so important?
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.