a
To find:
Pure Strategy Nash equilibria.
a
Explanation of Solution
In a two-player game,
Solve the following game for pure strategy Nash equilibria:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
To find the pure strategy Nash equilibria,one will use the underlining the “best response payoffs” method.
Step 1:
Underline the payoffs corresponding to player 1’s best responses. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy D is A; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy E is B; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy F is C; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. The matrix will be as follows:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
Step 2:
One should follow the same procedure for Player 2’s responses. One should underline the payoffs corresponding to player 2’s best responses. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy A is E; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy B is D; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy C is F; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. The matrix will be as follows:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
Step 3:
Now, one should look for the box where the responses of both the Players are underlined. It is the cell (C,F). This box corresponds to Nash equilibrium The given payoff is (4,4).
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gains unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
b)
To find:
Mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
b)
Explanation of Solution
One should have to find the mixed strategy. Nash equilibrium for the firdt two strategies of both the players.
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | |||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | ||
B | 5,8 | 7,6 |
When a player doesnot have a dominant strategy, she plays a mixed strategy. Here, to get the mixed strategy, Nash equilibrium one should assume that Player 1 plays the strategy A with probability p and strategy B with probability (1-p). Player 2 plays the strategy D with probability q and strategy E with probability (1-q).
Step 1:
Here, the expected payoff of player 1 for strategy A is given by multiplying each of the payoffs corresponding to S by their respective probabilities and then summing them over. This way the expected payoff from strategy is:
The expected pay off from strategy B is:
These expected payoffs must be equal. Therefore:
Therefore, player 2 plays both of his strategy with equal probability of ½.
Step 2:
The expected payoff from strategy D is:
The expected payoff from strategy B is:
These expected payoffs must be equal.
Therefore, player 2 plays both of his strategy with equal probability of ½
Hence, the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for the player 1 and player 2 is (0.5, 0.5)
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
c)
To ascertain:
Player’s expected payoffs
c)
Explanation of Solution
The expected payoff of the player for a given strategy in a mixed strategy game is given by summing over the actual probability multiplied by their respected probability.
In pure strategy equilibrium of the game described above is (4,4). That is the payoff of player A is 4 and that of B is also 4.
If player 1 choses strategy B, then the player 2 will play either of the strategy D or E with probability 0.5. Then for strategy A the expected payoff of player 1 is:
For player 2:
If player 2 choses strategy E, then the player 1 will play either of the strategy A or B with probability 0.5. Then for strategy E, the expected payoff of player 2 is:
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
d)
To ascertain:
Extensive form of the game.
d)
Explanation of Solution
The extensive form of a game corresponds to the game tree; where the action proceeds from left to right. The first move in this game belongs to player 1; he must chose whether to pay strategy A,B OR C. Then player 2 makes his decision. Payoffs are given at the end of the tree.
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
EBK MICROECONOMIC THEORY: BASIC PRINCIP
- What challenges do medical facilities face when trying to become more culturally competent? What kinds of assumptions do providers sometimes make about people from other cultures? What factors may cause providers to relate to patients in a biased manner? What can healthcare organizations do to ensure cultural competence among their employees?arrow_forwardBrazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, also known as BRICS, are emerging countries poised to be dominant economic players in the 21st century. What are some of the political, legal and economic conditions that help or hinder economic expansion for these countries?arrow_forwardExplain what is Microeconomics? Why is it important for all of us to understand what are the drivers in microeconomics?arrow_forward
- The production function for a product is given by Q =100KL.if the price of capital is 120 dollars per day and the price of labor 30 dollars per day what is the minimum cost of producing 1000 units of output ?arrow_forwardخصائص TVAarrow_forwardplease show complete solution, step by step, thanksarrow_forward
- To determine the benefits of extending hours of operation for a food truck business, the couple should calculate additional revenue, break-even analysis, market demand, and raise prices. They should analyze competitors' prices and customer sensitivity to price changes, determine price elasticity, and test the strategy by implementing a slight price increase and monitoring sales closely. If costs exceed revenues, the couple should analyze their financials, evaluate their business model, explore new revenue streams, and consider long-term viability. They should analyze their financial statements to identify high costs and areas for reduction, evaluate their business model based on market demand, and explore new revenue streams like catering, special events, or partnerships with local businesses. Long-term viability is a key consideration, as if the business still operates at a loss after making adjustments, it may be necessary to consider shutting down. Staying in business should be…arrow_forwardRespond to following post. You can charge higher prices if the parents think these are valuable by providing different services such as extended hours, healthy lunches, and smaller staff-to-child ratios. But pushing for prices much higher won’t make sense unless parents think the added value is worth the price hike. You should research your local parents to find out what they want. If you want your business to be profitable, then focus on your strengths, do great work and have a reputation. Promote your special products and keep your prices low. If you want to see if you’re making money, keep a log of all your profits and losses. You’re making money if you’re earning more than you’re losing. A break-even analysis can help you figure out how many customers you need to eat and start making money. Keep an eye on your budget so you don’t get off track.arrow_forwardIf you are willing to pay up to $8 for your first cup of coffee the blank of your first cup of coffee is $8arrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forward(Figure: Good Y and Good X) Suppose the budget constraint shifted from constraint 2 to constraint 1. What could have caused this change? Quantity of good Y 18 16 14 Budget constraint 2 12- 10 8 Budget constraint 1 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Quantity of good X an increase in income and an decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Y a decrease in income an decrease in the price of good X and no change in the price of Y a decrease in income and an increase in the price of good X relative to that of good Y an increase in income a decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Yarrow_forwardSuppose you have the three scenarios proposed below. Using the language of the Levy and Meltzer paper, Scenario(s). Scenario(s) _ can best be described as a randomized experiment. can best be described as an observational study, and Scenario A: Researchers randomly assign some individuals to a high-intensity workout program and others to a low-intensity program. They then track the participants to see how their cardiovascular health changes over time. Scenario B: Researchers randomly assign individuals to receive varying levels of nutrition education. They track participants and see how eating habits changed. Scenario C: Researchers have data on individuals' workout habits and their cardiovascular health. They use this data to describe the relationship between workout intensity and cardiovascular health. A; B and C A; B and C × A and B; C C; A and B B and C; Aarrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncMicroeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning