
a)
The question requires us to illustrate the statements with the help of the given figure.
a)

Answer to Problem 3CYU
The opponents and proponents both are correct.
Explanation of Solution
Point E represents the initial market situation where PE is the
When government sets a
Since the quantity supplied is greater than the quantity demanded, the market will have a surplus of gas.
Size of surplus = AB
Here, the opponents and proponents both are correct.
Explanation: Due to an increase in the price, the quantity supplied rises, and the gas owner would sell gas at a higher price and get a profit. So, proponents are correct.
When the price rises above the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded falls because some consumers would prefer not to purchase the product at all. So, the gas station owner will lose customers and thus, opponents are correct.
A price floor is an approach to regulating market price levels. The government always sets a price floor above the equilibrium price so, consumers are willing to buy fewer goods at a price floor because they are getting them at a higher price, while producers are willing to supply more because they are receiving a higher price for their goods, so a price floor leads to a persistent surplus of goods in the market. As a result, there is a surplus (an excess of the product) in the market because the quantity supplied is greater than the quantity demanded.
b)
The question requires us to illustrate the statements with the help of the given figure.
b)

Answer to Problem 3CYU
The opponents and proponents both are correct.
Explanation of Solution
Point E represents the initial market situation where PE is the equilibrium price and QE is the equilibrium quantity in the market.
When government sets a price floor at PF which is higher than the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded contracts from QE to QF, and the quantity supplied expands from QE to QS level.
Since the quantity supplied is greater than the quantity demanded, the market will have a surplus of gas.
Size of surplus = AB
Here, the opponents and proponents both are correct.
Explanation: when the government sets a price floor above the equilibrium price, the producers consider this high price as an incentive to produce high-quality goods. So, the gas station owner will provide better services. Therefore, proponents are correct.
The opponents are correct because when the price rises above the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded falls as some consumers would prefer not to purchase the product.
c)
The question requires us to illustrate the statements with the help of the given figure.
c)

Answer to Problem 3CYU
Proponents are wrong while opponents are correct.
Explanation of Solution
Point E represents the initial market situation where
When government sets a price floor at
Since the quantity supplied is greater than the quantity demanded, the market will have a surplus of gas.
Size of surplus = AB
Here, Proponents are wrong while opponents are correct.
Proponents are wrong as a price floor hurts the consumers and producers both because producers lose their customers as customers will prefer not to buy products at a higher price. So, a price floor is hurting consumers, and up to an extent few producers are hurt by a price floor.
Opponents are correct because a higher price floor incentivizes consumers to buy gas from cheaper sources. A price floor promotes black marketing, bribery, and corruption in the market.
Chapter 8 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Summarise the case for government intervention in the education marketarrow_forwardShould Maureen question the family about the history of the home? Can Maureen access public records for proof of repairs?arrow_forward3. Distinguish between a direct democracy and a representative democracy. Use appropriate examples to support your answers. [4] 4. Explain the distinction between outputs and outcomes in social service delivery [2] 5. A R1000 tax payable by all adults could be viewed as both a proportional tax and a regressive tax. Do you agree? Explain. [4] 6. Briefly explain the displacement effect in Peacock and Wiseman's model of government expenditure growth and provide a relevant example of it in the South African context. [5] 7. Explain how unbalanced productivity growth may affect government expenditure and briefly comment on its relevance to South Africa. [5] 8. South Africa has recently proposed an increase in its value-added tax rate to 15%, sparking much controversy. Why is it argued that value-added tax is inequitable and what can be done to correct the inequity? [5] 9. Briefly explain the difference between access to education and the quality of education, and why we should care about the…arrow_forward
- 20. Factors 01 pro B. the technological innovations available to companies. A. the laws that regulate manufacturers. C. the resources used to create output D. the waste left over after goods are produced. 21. Table 1.1 shows the tradeoff between different combinations of missile production and home construction, ceteris paribus. Complete the table by calculating the required opportunity costs for both missiles and houses. Then answer the indicated question(s). Combination Number of houses Opportunity cost of houses in Number of missiles terms of missiles J 0 4 K 10,000 3 L 17,000 2 1 M 21,000 0 N 23,000 Opportunity cost of missiles in terms of houses Tutorials-Principles of Economics m health carearrow_forwardIn a small open economy with a floating exchange rate, the supply of real money balances is fixed and a rise in government spending ______ Group of answer choices Raises the interest rate so that net exports must fall to maintain equilibrium in the goods market. Cannot change the interest rate so that net exports must fall to maintain equilibrium in the goods market. Cannot change the interest rate so income must rise to maintain equilibrium in the money market Raises the interest rate, so that income must rise to maintain equilibrium in the money market.arrow_forwardSuppose a country with a fixed exchange rate decides to implement a devaluation of its currency and commits to maintaining the new fixed parity. This implies (A) ______________ in the demand for its goods and a monetary (B) _______________. Group of answer choices (A) expansion ; (B) contraction (A) contraction ; (B) expansion (A) expansion ; (B) expansion (A) contraction ; (B) contractionarrow_forward
- Assume a small open country under fixed exchanges rate and full capital mobility. Prices are fixed in the short run and equilibrium is given initially at point A. An exogenous increase in public spending shifts the IS curve to IS'. Which of the following statements is true? Group of answer choices A new equilibrium is reached at point B. The TR curve will shift down until it passes through point B. A new equilibrium is reached at point C. Point B can only be reached in the absence of capital mobility.arrow_forwardA decrease in money demand causes the real interest rate to _____ and output to _____ in the short run, before prices adjust to restore equilibrium. Group of answer choices rise; rise fall; fall fall; rise rise; fallarrow_forwardIf a country's policy makers were to continously use expansionary monetary policy in an attempt to hold unemployment below the natural rate , the long urn result would be? Group of answer choices a decrease in the unemployment rate an increase in the level of output All of these an increase in the rate of inflationarrow_forward
- A shift in the Aggregate Supply curve to the right will result in a move to a point that is southwest of where the economy is currently at. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardAn oil shock can cause stagflation, a period of higher inflation and higher unemployment. When this happens, the economy moves to a point to the northeast of where it currently is. After the economy has moved to the northeast, the Federal Reserve can reduce that inflation without having to worry about causing more unemployment. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardThe long-run Phillips Curve is vertical which indicates Group of answer choices that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and the price level. None of these that in the long-run, the economy returns to a 4 percent level of inflation.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





