The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 2BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The persons J and A invented and patented a hard-bearing device for balancing rotors which they never used. A company E made an invention for automobile wheel balancing which was similar to the patented invention of persons J and A.
To explain:Possibility of patent infringement by the company E.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
After two years of research and the investment of considerable funds, coast-to-coast company (cc) develops a new product that it hopes will produce substantial profits. CC learns that a competitor, National sales, Inc, has made and begun to sell a nearly identical prod-uct CC learns from a reliable source that national paod a CC employee to obtain the plans for CC's product while it was in development. What legal re-course does CC have against National ?
Using the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background.
Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…
19) The Elle Corporation manufactures fingernail polish. Suzy buys a container of Elle's
fingernail polish, applies it to her nails, and suffers a severe allergic reaction. She sues Elle under
the implied warranty of merchantability, The test for determining whether Suzy will recover is
whether:
A) the nail polish she bought was suitable for the needs of the average consumer.
B) the nail polish she bought properly performed its function of coloring one's nails.
C) such a reaction in an appreciable number of consumers was reasonably foreseeable.
D) the ingredient causing the reaction was foreign to the nail polish or natural to it.
nating one model, Bobby notices
Chapter 8 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Brenda Brandt was admitted to Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center (Health Center) to receive treatment for urinary incontinence. During the course of an operation, the doctor surgically implanted a ProteGen Sling (sling) in Brandt. Subsequently, the manufacturer of the sling, Boston Scientific Corporation, issued a recall of the sling because it was causing medical complications in some patients. Brandt suffered serious complications and had the sling surgically removed. Brandt sued Boston Scientific Corporation and Health Center for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability included in Article 2 (Sales) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Health Center filed a motion with the court to have the case against it dismissed. Health Center argued that it was a provider of services and not a merchant that sold goods, and because the UCC (Sales) applies to the sale of goods, Health Center was not subject to the UCC. Health Center proved that Brandt’s bill was $11,174.50 total charge…arrow_forwardMr. Antipatiko filed a suit against Gerald, a registered medical technologist. Mr. Antipatiko went to the clinic and requested for Hepa B test needed for his employment. It was Gerald who obtained the blood from Mr. Antipatiko and consequently processed it for sampling. However, the test result indicated a “REACTIVE/POSITIVE”. Gerald performed another confirmatory test to ensure a reliable result. Still, the second test done had the same result. Gerald then issued the lab result indicating “REACTIVE/POSITIVE” after conformity with the Pathologist. Mr. Antipatiko was declined employment and was so furious and went to the clinic to confront Gerald stating that the result was inaccurate. He threatened Gerald saying that he will file an administrative case against him. If you were Gerald, how will you address and handle the situation? Provide your reason and basis to prevent the threatened suit.arrow_forwardThe insured is covered under O.A.P. 1 Owner’s Policy including Direct Compensation-Property Damage and is involved in an accident in Ontario with an automobile, for which he/she is not at fault. His/her car is severely damaged and personal belongings in the car are destroyed. Which one (1) of the following statements is correct? O A) Damage to the insured's car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party’s policy. O B) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured’s policy, less the policy deductible. O C) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party's policy. O D) Only damage to the insured’s car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured's policy.arrow_forward
- S insured his appliance store under an owner, landlords, and tenant’s policy that included products liability coverage. While he was demonstrating a microwave oven the door came open and injured a customer. Which of the following would protect S? The oven manufacture’s products liability policy The premises-operation section on S’s policy The products Liability section on S’s policy The incidental contracts section of S’s policyarrow_forwardThe Acme Electric Company worked day and night to develop a new current regulator designed to cut the electric power consumption in aluminum plants by 35%. They knew that, although the competition was fierce, their regulator could be produced more cheaply, was more reliable, and worked more efficiently than the competitors’ products. The owner, eager to capture the market, personally but somewhat hastily put together a 120-page proposal to the three major aluminum manufacturers, recommending that their regulators be installed at all company plants. She devoted the first 87 pages of the proposal to the mathematical theory and engineering design behind his new regulator, and the next 32 to descriptions of the new assembly line she planned to set up to produce regulators quickly. Buried in an appendix were the test results that compared her regulator’s performance with present models, and a poorly drawn graph showed how much the dollar savings would be. Acme Electric didn’t get the…arrow_forwardSue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in front of her store. This agreement is: (Choose all of the correct answers.) Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise Enforceable because Oscar Ruit is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to do Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruittarrow_forward
- Standard Appliance Co. has an employee pension plan under which Aurelia has worked for 31 years. Aurelia is laid off at age 60, and five years later, she retires and attempts to draw her pension benefits. However, Aurelia is informed that she is not eligible for pension benefits because she had not been working under the Standard Appliance Co. plan at the time of her retirement. Is this correct? Yes, if that is what the Standard Appliance Co. plan specifies. No, since Aurelia worked longer than 10 years for Standard Appliance Co. No, since Aurelia's benefits are vested. Yes, since Standard Appliance Co, only has a responsibility to current employees.arrow_forwardWarranty and strict liability represent two causes of action, often relied upon by plaintiffs who pursue recovery in a product liability case. Describe the two legal theories by making reference to the elements that need be proven; the obstacles with which a plaintiff may be confronted; the recoveries that be sought; and finally, the nature of the cause of action; hint from what discipline of law does each theory arisearrow_forwardCriminal liability requires both a bad act (actus reus) and a guilty mind (mens rea). Group startsTrue or False True, unselectedFalse, unselectedarrow_forward
- What is a release of liability clause (exculpatory clause)?arrow_forwardA long-time patient of Dr. Jones was admitted to the ICU. She was unable to respond and was having difficulty breathing. She required respirator support. Her son, her HCP, was called and came to the hospital. In discussion with the physician, the physician stated that he is aware of the patient’s wishes and suggests removing her from the respirator. The son said that he wants to keep his mother on the respirator. The physician insisted that he spoke with his mother at length and he knows that the patient does not want to be on a respirator. The son calls the Risk Manager to complain. You are the risk manager, what should be done?arrow_forwardUnder a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insurer? OA. To inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of loss OC. To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a daim for which the insured has been found legally responsible ODarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education