Practical Operations Management
Practical Operations Management
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781939297136
Author: Simpson
Publisher: HERCHER PUBLISHING,INCORPORATED
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 8, Problem 26P

a

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

Whether the following statement is true or not.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

a

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The following is the available information:

    FactorWeightLocation 1Location 2Location 3
    Cost of available land parcel0.3421
    Accessibility0.5524
    Size of available land parcel0.2153
  1. False
  2. Based on the weights given to the factor, the highest importance is given to accessibility (0.5). The second highest importance is given to the cost of available land parcels. Therefore, the statement is false.
  3. False
  4. Based on the available information, location 3 is rated with 4 points and location 2 is rated with 2 points. It clearly tells that location 3 is better accessible than location 2. Therefore, the statement is false.
  5. True
  6. Based on the weight given to the factor, the highest importance is given to accessibility (0.5). The second highest importance is given to the cost of the available land parcel (0.3) and the least important factor is given to the size of the available land parcel (0.2). Therefore, the given statement is true.

b

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The optimal location for new fire station.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

b

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The formula is given below to determine the optimal location.

Score = WiSi

Here,

  Wi = weight associated with factor i

  Si = Score that location earned on factor i

Now, calculate factor rating score for location 1:

The above formula denotes that the each factor should be multiplied by its weight, further, the answer of factor should be added.

Score = WiSi

  =(0.3×4)+(0.5×5)+(0.2×1)=1.2+2.5+0.2=3.9

Hence, the rating score is 3.9

Calculation of factor rating score for location 2:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.3×2)+(0.5×2)+(0.2×5)=0.6+1+1=2.6

Hence, the rating score is 2.6

Calculation of factor rating for location 3:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.3×1)+(0.5×4)+(0.2×3)=0.3+2+0.6=2.9

Hence, the factor rating score is 2.9

Hence, the company will select Location 1 to build new fire station. It is because the score of new location A is higher than the other two location.

c

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The weight of each factor.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

c

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Assume that the given weights were wrong, the company considered accessibility is three times important than the other two factors. Further, the other two factors are equally important.

The cost of available land parcel and the size of the available land parcels is equally important. Therefore, both are scored as one. Further, accessibility is three times important than other factors. Therefore, it should be scored as three. Finally, the total score is five, which is 1+1+3 = 5.

Hence, the weight of the cost of available land parcel is 0.20 (1/5), the weight of size of available land parcel is 0.20 (1/5), and accessibility is 0.60 (3/5).

d

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

Location of new fire station.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

d

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of factor rating score for location 1:

The above formula denotes that each factor should be multiplied by its weight. Further, the answer of factor should be added.

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×4)+(0.6×5)+(0.2×1)=0.8+3+0.2=4

Hence, the rating score is 4.

Calculation of factor rating score for location 2:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×2)+(0.6×2)+(0.2×5)=0.4+1.2+1=2.6

Hence, the rating score is 2.6

Calculation of factor rating score for location 3:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×1)+(0.6×4)+(0.2×3)=0.2+2.4+0.6=3.2

Hence, the rating score is 3.2

Hence, the company will select location A to build new fire station. It is because the score of location A is higher than the other two.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this throughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that Dallas plant has lost power. It cannot serve the DCs anymore and has to remain locked indefinitely. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary In comparing the Constraint Scenario to the What-if Scenario, a few key differences highlight the efficiencies evident in the supply chain. Firstly, the total cost in the Constraint Scenario is lower at $7,424,575.45, while the What-if Scenario incurs a total cost of $7,486,369.12, resulting in a cost delta of $61,793.67. Additionally, although both scenarios exhibit the same average service time of 0.72 days, the What-if Scenario has a more favorable average end-to-end service time of 2.41…
Employee In-Service Training ASSIGNMENT: In-Service Training. The intern is required to plan and implement two in-service training sessions for employees. Each in-service should last at least 10 but not more than 30 minutes and should be given to all employees affected. The preceptor or supervisor/unit manager must approve all in-service topics. 1) One presentation should be related to a policy or procedure of any kind (e.g. proper use of equipment); 2) The second presentation must be related to sanitation or safety. For each in-service presentation, the intern must develop a written class plan and a visual aid (may be a handout, poster, PowerPoint slide presentation, etc.) appropriate to the life experiences, cultural diversity and educational background of the target audience. The intern must also measure behavior change. Note, this cannot be measured by a written pre- and post- test. That would be measuring knowledge. The intern mustactually observe and document that the learners…
For a dietary manager in a nursing home to train a dietary aide
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Text book image
MARKETING 2018
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033753
Author:Pride
Publisher:CENGAGE L