Practical Operations Management
Practical Operations Management
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781939297136
Author: Simpson
Publisher: HERCHER PUBLISHING,INCORPORATED
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 8, Problem 26P

a

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

Whether the following statement is true or not.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

a

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The following is the available information:

    FactorWeightLocation 1Location 2Location 3
    Cost of available land parcel0.3421
    Accessibility0.5524
    Size of available land parcel0.2153
  1. False
  2. Based on the weights given to the factor, the highest importance is given to accessibility (0.5). The second highest importance is given to the cost of available land parcels. Therefore, the statement is false.
  3. False
  4. Based on the available information, location 3 is rated with 4 points and location 2 is rated with 2 points. It clearly tells that location 3 is better accessible than location 2. Therefore, the statement is false.
  5. True
  6. Based on the weight given to the factor, the highest importance is given to accessibility (0.5). The second highest importance is given to the cost of the available land parcel (0.3) and the least important factor is given to the size of the available land parcel (0.2). Therefore, the given statement is true.

b

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The optimal location for new fire station.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

b

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The formula is given below to determine the optimal location.

Score = WiSi

Here,

  Wi = weight associated with factor i

  Si = Score that location earned on factor i

Now, calculate factor rating score for location 1:

The above formula denotes that the each factor should be multiplied by its weight, further, the answer of factor should be added.

Score = WiSi

  =(0.3×4)+(0.5×5)+(0.2×1)=1.2+2.5+0.2=3.9

Hence, the rating score is 3.9

Calculation of factor rating score for location 2:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.3×2)+(0.5×2)+(0.2×5)=0.6+1+1=2.6

Hence, the rating score is 2.6

Calculation of factor rating for location 3:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.3×1)+(0.5×4)+(0.2×3)=0.3+2+0.6=2.9

Hence, the factor rating score is 2.9

Hence, the company will select Location 1 to build new fire station. It is because the score of new location A is higher than the other two location.

c

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The weight of each factor.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

c

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Assume that the given weights were wrong, the company considered accessibility is three times important than the other two factors. Further, the other two factors are equally important.

The cost of available land parcel and the size of the available land parcels is equally important. Therefore, both are scored as one. Further, accessibility is three times important than other factors. Therefore, it should be scored as three. Finally, the total score is five, which is 1+1+3 = 5.

Hence, the weight of the cost of available land parcel is 0.20 (1/5), the weight of size of available land parcel is 0.20 (1/5), and accessibility is 0.60 (3/5).

d

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

Location of new fire station.

Concept Introduction: The weighted average method is a method to calculate the mean in which weights or numerical value is given to qualitative data according to the importance.

d

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Calculation of factor rating score for location 1:

The above formula denotes that each factor should be multiplied by its weight. Further, the answer of factor should be added.

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×4)+(0.6×5)+(0.2×1)=0.8+3+0.2=4

Hence, the rating score is 4.

Calculation of factor rating score for location 2:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×2)+(0.6×2)+(0.2×5)=0.4+1.2+1=2.6

Hence, the rating score is 2.6

Calculation of factor rating score for location 3:

  Score=WiSi

  Score=(0.2×1)+(0.6×4)+(0.2×3)=0.2+2.4+0.6=3.2

Hence, the rating score is 3.2

Hence, the company will select location A to build new fire station. It is because the score of location A is higher than the other two.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
• We Are HIRING Salesforce Developer (2 - 4 Years) @ Cloudodyssey It Solutions Requirement : Appropriate knowledge on Salesforce standard objects Leads, Account, Contacts, Opportunity, Products, Lead process, Sales process, is required. • Hands-on experience in Salesforce Experience Cloud, Sales Cloud and Lightning. • • Hands experience with Salesforce development, administration, system integrations, Lightning Design System, and bug fixes. Experience in configuration, integration, APIs creation, testing and deployment of Salesforce.com functionality. Eloquent verbal and written communication skills. • Familiar with Agile framework. Work Location: Bangalore SUBMIT YOUR CV hello@cloudodyssey.co
Agree or disagree with post On the surface, the numbers in financial statements do present a snapshot of a company's financial position and performance. However, just looking at the raw numbers often doesn't tell the whole story or reveal underlying trends and relationships that are crucial for making informed decisions. Think of it like looking at individual pieces of a puzzle. Each number is a piece, providing some information. But to see the complete picture – the company's overall financial health, its performance over time, how it compares to its peers, and its potential future – you need to assemble those pieces using different analytical tools.  For example: Horizontal analysis helps us understand how specific financial statement items have changed over multiple periods. Is revenue growing? Are expenses increasing at a faster rate than sales? This reveals trends that a single year's numbers wouldn't show. Vertical analysis allows us to see the relative size of each item within…
What can you do in response to an insulting offer?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Text book image
MARKETING 2018
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033753
Author:Pride
Publisher:CENGAGE L