The evidence makes the impactor theory the currently preferred explanation for the origin of the Moon, and the evidence remains to be found to rule out the competing theories.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 23QP

To determine

The evidence makes the impactor theory the currently preferred explanation for the origin of the Moon, and the evidence remains to be found to rule out the competing theories.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Which of the following is least reasonable regarding impact craters? Group of answer choices The size and shape of the crater and the amount of material excavated depends on factors such as the velocity and mass of the impacting body and the geology of the surface. Craters are most often are circular but more elongate craters can be produced with impactors striking the surface at very low angles. The Moon has more craters than the Earth because of its strong tidal force on the impactors. Objects from space typically hit Earth at about 20 km/s ande produce craters that can be approximately 20 times larger in diameter than the impacting objects. The faster the incoming impactor, the larger the crater.

Based on the physical aspects of Catena Mendeleev, what is the most plausible explanation for how crater chains are formed on the Moon? a. these craters chains are formed by a series of impacts from a passing comet or asteroid that just passed to close too the Moon and ended up colliding with the Moon b. they are the result of surface collapse due to the prescence of an underground fault c. they are primarily the result of secondary fragments hitting the lunar surface from an initially from an larger impact fragment that resulted in another larger, distant crater

Hellas Planitia includes the word "planitia" which is the latin word for "plain" in its name. The name would seem to indicate thats Hellas Planitia is a low lying plain, yet it is clearly a crater, and a very large one at that. The most probable reason for this discrepancy in its name is because: a. It is a simple naming error that for some reason has so far escaped correction. b. There is a disagreement among astronomers about the true nature of Hellas Planitia. c. Its true nature was not apparent over 100 years ago when it was observed using ground based telescopes. d. Astronomers really know its true nature and misconceptions among the public among the public are not of great concern to them.