Case summary:
The ship M owned by the KT company. At the time of winter season the lake E was frozen and ships and other moored at the harbours on the river B. One night an ice gridlock crumbled upstream, sending big hunks of ice downstream. Hunks of ice started to heap up in contradiction of the ship M. The ship broke loose when a neglectfully built person D to which one mooring chain was devoted dragged out of the crushed.
The ship started moving down the S-shaped waterway severe first and hit another ship T. The ship T also loose from its tie-up, and the two vessels drifted downcast the river together. The dual containers considerably blocked the movement of the waterway, causing frost and water to back up and extra connexions as far as three miles upstream.
To discuss: Whether any one is liable.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 8 Solutions
BUSINESS LAW
- Describe the conflicting motivations in the mixed motive nature of negotiation.arrow_forwardDo you think that the use of Charts and Graphics is important in your career?arrow_forwardExplore the significance of data in the decision-making process. Share a mock scenario or a real-life experience where data played a crucial role in making informed decisions. Use a video or interview to present different perspectives on how data-driven decisions can impact outcomes. Analyze the limitations and potential biases associated with relying solely on data for decision-making and suggest strategies to mitigate these challenges.arrow_forward
- Please original work How can business analytics (BA) methods such as Online Analytical Processing (OLAP), data visualization, and multidimensionality enhance decision-making processes within an organization? How can management support system (MSS) modeling, when integrated with spreadsheet tools, be applied to solve real-world business challenges? Provide examples from industries where BA and MSS have significantly impacted organizational strategy. Please cite text references and add weblinksarrow_forwardBased on the case study Develop a high-level or summary: Human Resource Management Planarrow_forwardBased on the case study Develop a high-level or summary: Risk Management Planarrow_forward
- You are the newest member of an international HR staff at Transnational Electronics (TE). Your manager wants to improve productivity in the Delhi, India factory, where two hundred (200) are employed. Your boss has proposed rank ordering (top to bottom) each department’s employees based on their demonstrated performance and laying off the bottom 15% within 30 days from today. The employment seniority distribution is: 25 + years 101 10 to 24 40 5 to 9 16 4 years 8 3 years 9 2 years 12 1 year 8 1 - 11 months 6 What should be the human resource strategy and response be on this topic?arrow_forwardwhy are global company layoffs so difficult to do?arrow_forwardBuilding a reputation and business overseas will take time. Having a clean public image will help recruit potential employees internationally. How can the president of a small company be sure of this?arrow_forward
- International assignments often fail due to cultural, political, legal, and economic differences between countries. These differences can have an impact on how employees adjust to their new environment and how effectively they can manage these new relationships. I need help to elaborate thisarrow_forwardYou are the newest member of an international HR staff at Transnational Electronics (TE). Your manager wants to improve productivity in the Delhi, India factory, where two hundred (200) are employed. Your boss has proposed rank ordering (top to bottom) each department’s employees based on their demonstrated performance and laying off the bottom 15% within 30 days from today. The employment seniority distribution is: 25 + years 101 10 to 24 40 5 to 9 16 4 years 8 3 years 9 2 years 12 1 year 8 1 - 11 months 6 Assuming that the potentially affected employees' daily compensation is the equivalent of $35.00 USD, what is the cost of implementing this reduction?arrow_forwardyour manager wants to improve productivity in the Delhi, India factory, where two hundred (200) are employed. Your boss has proposed rank ordering (top to bottom) each department’s employees based on their demonstrated performance and laying off the bottom 15% within 30 days from today. The employment seniority distribution is: 25 + years 101 10 to 24 40 5 to 9 16 4 years 8 3 years 9 2 years 12 1 year 8 1 - 11 months 6 What are the major issues faced by the firm in regards to this proposal based on Indian labor laws?arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON





