
a)
Whether the practice (a patent for a superior fax machine which leads to the only person able to sell that type of fax machine and to purchase the fax machine, a purchaser is required to buy a service contract) is legal under antitrust law
a)

Answer to Problem 1CYU
This practice is illegal.
Explanation of Solution
When a patent for a superior fax machine makes the person able to sell that type of fax machine and purchase the fax machine, a purchaser is required to buy a service contract first then, this practice would be illegal because there is a tying arrangement that involves conditions. In this case, the seller imposes a condition on the buyer to purchase the product after the purchase of the service contract which means the buyer is required to purchase another product to buy one product of the seller.
Therefore, it is illegal for businesses.
Introduction: The antitrust laws indicate the business practices such as unlawful mergers for which the court decides whether they are legal or illegal according to the facts of the case.
b)
Whether the practice (If someone invented a new coffee maker type that is effective and easy to use but the purchasing of this product requires buying all coffee-making supplies and accessories of the seller) is legal under antitrust law
b)

Answer to Problem 1CYU
This practice is illegal.
Explanation of Solution
The business practice which involves exclusive dealing would be illegal, and, if someone invented a new coffee maker type that is effective and easy to use but the purchasing of this product requires buying all coffee-making supplies and accessories of the seller then, this practice is based on exclusive dealing.
Therefore, this practice is illegal as the business is bound or restricted to perform any exclusive dealing under the antitrust laws.
Introduction: The antitrust laws indicate the business practices such as unlawful mergers for which the court decides whether they are legal or illegal according to the facts of the case.
c)
Whether the practice (if there are several other car dealerships in town and someone owns a car dealership and plans to buy the dealership across the street and merge the two companies) is legal under antitrust law
c)

Answer to Problem 1CYU
This practice is legal.
Explanation of Solution
If there are several other car dealerships in town and someone owns a car dealership and plans to buy the dealership across the street and merge the two companies then this is a legal practice because the merger will not result in monopolization. In this case, there are many other car dealerships in the town that can prevent the price control or
Therefore, this is a legal practice.
Introduction: The antitrust laws indicate the business practices such as unlawful mergers for which the court decides whether they are legal or illegal according to the facts of the case.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 77 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Problema 4 (20 puntos): Supongamos que tenemos un ingreso de $120 y enfrentamos los precios P₁ =6 y P₂ =4. Nuestra función de utilidad es: U(x1, x2) = x0.4x0.6 a) Planteen el problema de optimización y obtengan las condiciones de primer orden. b) Encuentren el consumo óptimo de x1 y x2. c) ¿Cómo cambiará nuestra elección óptima si el ingreso aumenta a $180?arrow_forwardPlease draw the graph for number 4 and 5, I appreciate it!!arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forward• Prismatic Cards: A prismatic card will be a card that counts as having every suit. We will denote, e.g., a prismatic Queen card by Q*. With this notation, 2.3045 Q would be a double flush since every card is a diamond and a heart. • Wild Cards: A wild card counts as having every suit and every denomination. Denote wild cards with a W; if there are multiple, we will denote them W₁, W2, etc. With this notation, W2 20.30054 would be both a three-of-a-kind (three 2's) and a flush (5 diamonds). If we add multiple wild cards to the deck, they count as distinct cards, so that (e.g.) the following two hands count as "different hands" when counting: W15 5Q and W255◊♡♡♣♣ In addition, 1. Let's start with the unmodified double-suited deck. (a) Call a hand a flush house if it is a flush and a full house, i.e. if all cards share a suit and there are 3 cards of one denomination and two of another. For example, 550. house. How many different flush house hands are there? 2. Suppose we add one wild…arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- In a classic oil-drilling example, you are trying to decide whether to drill for oil on a field that might or might not contain any oil. Before making this decision, you have the option of hiring a geologist to perform some seismic tests and then predict whether there is any oil or not. You assess that if there is actually oil, the geologist will predict there is oil with probability 0.85 . You also assess that if there is no oil, the geologist will predict there is no oil with probability 0.90. Please answer the two questions below, as I am trying to ensure that I am correct. 1. Why will these two probabilities not appear on the decision tree? 2. Which probabilities will be on the decision tree?arrow_forwardAsap pleasearrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forwardIn this question, you will test relative purchasing parity (PPP) using the data. Use yearly data from FRED website from 1971 to 2020: (i) The Canadian Dollars to U.S. Dollar Spot Exchange Rate (ER) (ii) Consumer price index for Canada (CAN_CPI), and (iii) Consumer price index for the US (US_CPI). Inflation is measured by the consumer price index (CPI). The relative PPP equation is: AE CAN$/US$ ECAN$/US$ = π CAN - πUS Submit the Excel sheet that you worked on. 1. First, compute the percentage change in the exchange rate (left-hand side of the equation). Caculate the variable for each year from 1972 to 2020 in Column E (named Change_ER) of the Excel sheet. For example, for 1972, compute E3: (B3-B2)/B2). ER1972 ER1971 ER 1971 (in Excel, the formula in cellarrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





