Concept explainers
Let α1 > 0, α2 > 0, with α1 + α2 = α. Then
- a. Use this equation to derive a more general expression for a 100(1 - α)% CI for μ of which the interval (7.5) is a special case.
- b. Let α = .05 and α1 = α /4, α2 = 3α/4. Does this result in a narrower or wider interval than the interval (7.5)?
a.
Derive the general expression for
Answer to Problem 8E
The general expression for
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
For
Calculation:
The usual
Here, it is given that with probability
General expression for confidence interval is obtained as follows:
From the obtained result, there is evidence to infer that with probability
Therefore, the
b.
Find the width of the usual confidence interval about mean for
Find the width of the confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
Compare the two confidence intervals.
Answer to Problem 8E
The width of the usual confidence interval about mean for
The width of the confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
The confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Width of usual confidence interval for
Critical value:
The level of significance is
From Table A.3 of the standard normal distribution in Appendix , the critical value corresponding to 0.05 area to the right is 1.96.
Thus, the critical value is
The usual
The general formula to obtain width of the interval is,
Thus, the width of the usual confidence interval about mean for
Width of usual confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
Critical value:
For
The level of significance is
From Table A.3 of the standard normal distribution in Appendix , the critical value corresponding to 0.0125 area to the right is 2.24.
Thus, the critical value is
For
The level of significance is
From Table A.3 of the standard normal distribution in Appendix , the critical value corresponding to 0.0375 area to the right is 1.78.
Thus, the critical value is
The
The general formula to obtain width of the interval is,
Thus, the width of the usual confidence interval for population mean
Comparison:
The width of the usual confidence interval about mean for
The width of the confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
By observing the two widths it can be concluded that, confidence interval obtained in part (a) for
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Student Solutions Manual for Devore's Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 9th
- T1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Characterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forward
- Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:CengageTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,