The parents of a five-year-old child C filed a case against the company F, alleging that the seat belt of their car was defectively designed. However, C wore the seat belt incorrectly. The car had a collision because of which C suffered injury in his spinal cord that resulted into paralysis. To explain : The claim of the company that C misused the seatbelt which caused the injury.

Question

The Karl’s store strongly condemn their employees to eat, drink or smoke within their stores premises. Jessica was therefore surprised to walk into her laundry store and finding two of the employee shaving lunch at the front counter. There was a large pizza in its box, and the two of them were eating slices of pizza, drinking colas and throwing paper plates. Not only did it look messy, but there were soda spills on the counter and the stores melted from onions and tomatoes. In addition to being a turnoff to customers, the mess on the counter meant that a customer’s order might actually become soiled in the store. Although this was a serious matter, Jessica didn’t feel that what the counter people were doing was grounds for dismissal partly because the store manager had apparently ignored their actions. It seemed to her that the matter called for more than just a warning but less than dismissal. If you were at Jessica’s place what action would you have taken and why? What type of…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 5BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The parents of a five-year-old child C filed a case against the company F, alleging that the seat belt of their car was defectively designed. However, C wore the seat belt incorrectly. The car had a collision because of which C suffered injury in his spinal cord that resulted into paralysis.

To explain : The claim of the company that C misused the seatbelt which caused the injury.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The Karl’s store strongly condemn their employees to eat, drink or smoke within their stores premises. Jessica was therefore surprised to walk into her laundry store and finding two of the employee shaving lunch at the front counter. There was a large pizza in its box, and the two of them were eating slices of pizza, drinking colas and throwing paper plates. Not only did it look messy, but there were soda spills on the counter and the stores melted from onions and tomatoes. In addition to being a turnoff to customers, the mess on the counter meant that a customer’s order might actually become soiled in the store. Although this was a serious matter, Jessica didn’t feel that what the counter people were doing was grounds for dismissal partly because the store manager had apparently ignored their actions. It seemed to her that the matter called for more than just a warning but less than dismissal. If you were at Jessica’s place what action would you have taken and why? What type of…

Brenda Brandt was admitted to Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center (Health Center) to receive treatment for urinary incontinence. During the course of an operation, the doctor surgically implanted a ProteGen Sling (sling) in Brandt. Subsequently, the manufacturer of the sling, Boston Scientific Corporation, issued a recall of the sling because it was causing medical complications in some patients. Brandt suffered serious complications and had the sling surgically removed. Brandt sued Boston Scientific Corporation and Health Center for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability included in Article 2 (Sales) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Health Center filed a motion with the court to have the case against it dismissed. Health Center argued that it was a provider of services and not a merchant that sold goods, and because the UCC (Sales) applies to the sale of goods, Health Center was not subject to the UCC. Health Center proved that Brandt’s bill was $11,174.50 total charge…

An altercation took place between a mother and a teacher at XY Nurserary located at 3Poinsietta Avenue, Old Harbour, St. Catherine. The incident lead to both the parent and teacherbeing locked-up for the night after a short bloody exchange. Additionally, the Early Childhood Commission got involved after receiving a complaint. Later on in the week, ti was found that many parents were concerned about the issue and became hesitant to have their children return to the institution.Task:•• Develop a memorandum to be sent out to parents reassuring them that the institution remains a safe place for their children.