Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk. An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor. However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse. Characters in the case: Person E: The patient Person X: The employee of the hospital. Doctor Nurse To discuss: The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes to be improved to have a quality and safety of the patients such as Person E.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes of Person X are as follows:

Person X must have a good communication with both the patients and doctors
Critical thinking is an important skill that a nurse must have.
Adaptability to the current situation.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

This is an Individual assignment. The student will create a power point presentation thatidentifies the four (4) parts of each element of a Disaster Shelter. Be creative ex: voice over, arecorded zoom (must upload link to Blackboard) that discusses each element of your powerpoint.Part 1: Location: Needs Assessment of Logan Elementary School (consider thefollowing): Space Air flow Safety Security Supplies Electricity/Water/Food/SanitationPart 2: Interprofessional Team: Identifying roles of teams within shelter (consider thefollowing): Nurses’ role Social Worker Red Cross Volunteer organizations SpiritualPart 3: Triage - Placement of the community (people) within the shelter (consider thefollowing): Men/women/children/elderly/injured/families/pets Population at riskPart 4: Discharge considerations from shelter (consider the following): Home – do they have a place to return to? Financial support Resiliency

DaVita Dietitian Reference Manual Module 7- Adequacy of Hemodialysis CASE STUDIES Case 1 David was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease a year ago, and now needs hemodialysis. At his first treatment, the nurse hooks up the bloodlines to an access in David's chest. He tells her that he had surgery on his arm three months ago so it can be used for dialysis eventually. 1. What type of access does David have for the initial treatment? 2. Is David's arm access most likely a graft or fistula? 3. What possible reasons prevent use of a fistula or graft for the first dialysis treatment? Case 2 Ramon, a hemodialysis patient for six years, has lost 1.5 kg over the past six weeks. He denies nausea or vomiting, but does admit to eating less at meals and skipping dinner some days. Current dialysis prescription is: 3 1/2 hours (210 minutes), 3 times a week, ASAHI 1050S, APS dialyzer, dialysis flow rate 800 ml/min, blood flow rate 400 ml/min. Monthly bloodwork is as follows: Date K PO4 Pre-BUN…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes to be improved to have a quality and safety of the patients such as Person E.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes of Person X are as follows:

Person X must have a good communication with both the patients and doctors
Critical thinking is an important skill that a nurse must have.
Adaptability to the current situation.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes to be improved to have a quality and safety of the patients such as Person E.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes of Person X are as follows:

Person X must have a good communication with both the patients and doctors
Critical thinking is an important skill that a nurse must have.
Adaptability to the current situation.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes to be improved to have a quality and safety of the patients such as Person E.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes of Person X are as follows:

Person X must have a good communication with both the patients and doctors
Critical thinking is an important skill that a nurse must have.
Adaptability to the current situation.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes to be improved to have a quality and safety of the patients such as Person E.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The knowledge, skill, and attitudes of Person X are as follows:

Person X must have a good communication with both the patients and doctors
Critical thinking is an important skill that a nurse must have.
Adaptability to the current situation.

Answer 6

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Answer 7

Chapter 7, Problem 1RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The response of the given situation in the case by Person X.

Answer 8

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Responses to the situation are as follows:

Firstly, Person X must be aware of the condition of the patient before starting the protocol. Once the doctor asked to inject the dosage to the patient, shee must inform the doctor that shee is not aware of injecting the dosage and shee is new to the work or shee must go and ask for the help of the doctor before the injection.

Answer 9

Expert Solution

Answer 10

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Answer 13

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X.

Answer 14

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X under this situation are as follows:

The professional knowledge, skill, and practice of Person X were not up to the mark as she is new to this profession. Person X does not have any professional experience in this regard.

Answer 15

Expert Solution

Answer 16

Expert Solution

Answer 17

Expert Solution

Answer 18

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.

Answer 19

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in an emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse is a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient. This led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital.

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The action of the nurse is legal and ethical.

Answer 20

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Whether the action of the nurse is legal and ethical:

No, the action of the nurse is not legal and ethical as she must have informed the doctor that she is not comfortable in the injection of dosage or she must have gone and asked for the help of the doctor before the injection because the life of the patient is at the hands of the nurse and the doctor. The life of the patient is at full risk because of the negligence of both.