
(a):
Calculation of total utility and
(a):

Explanation of Solution
The total utility can be calculated by adding up the marginal utilities and the marginal utility can be calculated by subtracting the total utility at the previous unit consumed from the total utility at the present consumption.
The total utility and the marginal utility at 1 unit consumption are 10 and the marginal utility from the 2nd unit is 8. Thus, the total utility at the 2nd unit can be thus calculated by adding up the marginal utilities as follows:
Thus, the total utility at the 2nd unit of consumption is 18 utils.
The total utility at 2nd unit is calculated as 18. The total utility at the 3rd unit is given as 25. Thus, the marginal utility of the 3rd unit can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the marginal utility of the 3rd unit is 7 utils.
Similarly, the total utility at the 4th unit is 30 and the 3rd unit is 25. The marginal utility of the 4th unit can be calculated using the same equation as follows:
Thus, the marginal utility of the 4th unit is 5 utils.
The total utility at the 4th unit is given as 30 utils. The marginal utility from the 5th unit is given as 3. So, the total utility from the 5th unit can be calculated by adding these two together as follows:
Thus, the total utility of 5 units is 33 utils.
The total utility of 6 units is given as 34. The total utility of 5 units is calculated as 33. Thus, the marginal utility of the 6th unit can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the marginal utility of 6th unit is 1 util.
Thus, the table can be filled as follows:
Units consumed | Total utility | Marginal utility |
0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 10 | 10 |
2 | 18 | 8 |
3 | 25 | 7 |
4 | 30 | 5 |
5 | 33 | 3 |
6 | 34 | 1 |
The marginal utility starts from 10 and it starts to decline from 10 to 1, at the end. The marginal benefit thus shows a decline. Since the total utility is the addition of marginal utilities, because of the decline in the marginal utility, the total utility increases but at a diminishing rate.
Utility: It can be described as the benefit or the satisfaction that the consumption of a good or service provides to the consumer.
Total utility: It is the summation of all utilities derived, by the consumer, from the consumption of the individual units of a specific good or service.
Marginal utility: It is the extra satisfaction that a consumer derives from the consumption of an additional unit of the specific good or service.
(b):
Acceptability of the statement.
(b):

Explanation of Solution
The rational consumers in the economy try to maximize the total utility that they derive from the consumption of the goods and services. Thus, the decline in the marginal utility is not the reason which determines the quantity demanded. Thus, the individuals will try to maximize the total utility and thus, the statement is not agreeable. The marginal utility beyond the 1st unit may be sufficiently great in terms of price. As a result, people will demand beyond the 1st unit. Thus, the statement is not agreeable.
(c):
Whether the given statement is acceptable.
(c):

Explanation of Solution
People compare the level of utility that they receive from the consumption of the goods and services with their respective prices. When the price of the commodity or service is higher than the total utility that the consumer receives from the very first unit of consumption, the rational consumer may decide not to purchase the item. Thus, the statement is agreeable.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
EBK MICROECONOMICS
- Ask one question at a time. Keep questions specific and include all details. Need more help? Subject matter experts with PhDs and Masters are standing by 24/7 to answer your question.**arrow_forward1b. (5 pts) Under the 1990 Farm Bill and given the initial situation of a target price and marketing loan, indicate where the market price (MP), quantity supplied (QS) and demanded (QD), government stocks (GS), and Deficiency Payments (DP) and Marketing Loan Gains (MLG), if any, would be on the graph below. If applicable, indicate the price floor (PF) on the graph. TP $ NLR So Do Q/yrarrow_forwardNow, let us assume that Brie has altruistic preferences. Her utility function is now given by: 1 UB (xA, YA, TB,YB) = (1/2) (2x+2y) + (2x+2y) What would her utility be at the endowment now? (Round off your answer to the nearest whole number.) 110arrow_forward
- Problema 4 (20 puntos): Supongamos que tenemos un ingreso de $120 y enfrentamos los precios P₁ =6 y P₂ =4. Nuestra función de utilidad es: U(x1, x2) = x0.4x0.6 a) Planteen el problema de optimización y obtengan las condiciones de primer orden. b) Encuentren el consumo óptimo de x1 y x2. c) ¿Cómo cambiará nuestra elección óptima si el ingreso aumenta a $180?arrow_forwardPlease draw the graph for number 4 and 5, I appreciate it!!arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forward• Prismatic Cards: A prismatic card will be a card that counts as having every suit. We will denote, e.g., a prismatic Queen card by Q*. With this notation, 2.3045 Q would be a double flush since every card is a diamond and a heart. • Wild Cards: A wild card counts as having every suit and every denomination. Denote wild cards with a W; if there are multiple, we will denote them W₁, W2, etc. With this notation, W2 20.30054 would be both a three-of-a-kind (three 2's) and a flush (5 diamonds). If we add multiple wild cards to the deck, they count as distinct cards, so that (e.g.) the following two hands count as "different hands" when counting: W15 5Q and W255◊♡♡♣♣ In addition, 1. Let's start with the unmodified double-suited deck. (a) Call a hand a flush house if it is a flush and a full house, i.e. if all cards share a suit and there are 3 cards of one denomination and two of another. For example, 550. house. How many different flush house hands are there? 2. Suppose we add one wild…arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- In a classic oil-drilling example, you are trying to decide whether to drill for oil on a field that might or might not contain any oil. Before making this decision, you have the option of hiring a geologist to perform some seismic tests and then predict whether there is any oil or not. You assess that if there is actually oil, the geologist will predict there is oil with probability 0.85 . You also assess that if there is no oil, the geologist will predict there is no oil with probability 0.90. Please answer the two questions below, as I am trying to ensure that I am correct. 1. Why will these two probabilities not appear on the decision tree? 2. Which probabilities will be on the decision tree?arrow_forwardAsap pleasearrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning




