Project Analysis You are discussing a project analysis with a coworker. The project involves real options, such as expanding the project if successful, or abandoning the project if it fails. Your coworker makes the following statement: “This analysis is ridiculous. We looked at expanding or abandoning the project in two years, but there are many other options we should consider. For example, we could expand in one year, and expand further in two years. Or we could expand in one year, and abandon the project in two years. There are too many options for us to examine. Because of this, anything this analysis would give us is worthless.” How would you evaluate this statement? Considering that with any capital budgeting project there are an infinite number of real options, when do you stop the option analysis on an individual project?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
UPENN: LOOSE LEAF CORP.FIN W/CONNECT
- The Siler Construction Company is about to bid on a new industrial construction project. To formulate their bid, the company needs to estimate the time required for the project. Based on past experience, management expects that the project will require at least 24 months, and could take as long as 48 months if there are complications. The most likely scenario is that the project will require 30 months. a. Assume that the actual time for the project can be approximated using a triangular probability distribution. What is the probability that the project will take less than 30 months? b. What is the probability that the project will take between 28 and 32 months? c. To submit a competitive bid, the company believes that if the project takes more than 36 months, then the company will lose money on the project. Management does not want to bid on the project if there is greater than a 25% chance that they will lose money on this project. Should the company bid on this project?arrow_forwardIf the company uses a project cost of capital of 13%, what will be the expected net present value (NPV) of this project? (Mote: Do not round Intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole dollar.) -$7,874 Ⓒ-$6,630 -$8,288 O-$9,531 St. Margaret Beer Co. has the option to delay starting this project for one year so that analysts can gather more information about whether demand will be strong or weak. If the company chooses to delay the project, it will have to give up a year of cash flows, because the project will then be only a two-year project. However, the company will know for certain if the market demand will be strong or weak before deciding to invest in it. What will be the expected NPV If St. Margaret Beer Co. delays starting the project? (Note: Do not round Intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole dollar.) $1,880 Ⓒ$1,410 What is the value of St. Margaret Beer Co's option to delay the start of the project? (Note: Do not round…arrow_forwardWaste Management Inc. is analyzing an average-risk project, and the following data have been developed. Unit sales will be constant, but the sales price will increase with inflation. Fixed costs will also be constant, but variable costs will rise with inflation. The project should last for 3 years, and there will be no salvage value. This is just one project for the firm, so any losses can be used to offset gains on other firm projects. What is the project's expected NPV? IRR? Would you accept this project? WACC 9.50% Net investment cost (depreciable basis) $100,000 Units sold 40,000 Average price per unit, Year 1 $25.00 Fixed op. cost excl. depr'n (constant) $150,000 Variable op. cost/unit, Year 1 $20.20 Annual depreciation rate 33.33% Expected inflation 5.00% Tax rate 40.0% Please show work.arrow_forward
- Two new software projects are proposed to a young, start-up company. The Delta project will cost $150,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $40,000. The Echo project will cost $200,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $50,000. The company is very concerned about their cash flow. Using the payback period, which project is better from a cash flow standpoint? Why? Present the payback period for each project. Use this formula: Payback period = Investment/Annual Savingsarrow_forwardYour boss wants you to conduct a sensitivity and scenario analysis to determine whether the following project is a winner. You are entering an established market, and you know the market size will be 1,100,000 units. You are unsure of your exact market share, the price you will be able to charge, and your variable cost per unit, but have determined a range of possible values for each (in the table below). Your initial investment cost is $150 million, and that investment will depreciate in straight-line form over the 20-year life of the project. There are no new NWC requirements, and there will be no salvage value at the end of the 20 years. The tax rate is 35%. The discount rate is 18%. a) Use the following table to conduct a full sensitivity analysis for the project. Make sure to include the NPV for the expected outcome as part of the full sensitivity analysis. Also add the best- and worst-case scenarios to the full sensitivity analysis. Show all of your work (written out, not an…arrow_forwardTwo new software projects are proposed to a young, start-up company. The Alpha project will cost $150,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $40,000. The Beta project will cost $200,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $50,000. The company is very concerned about their cash flow. Using the payback period, which project is better from a cash flow standpoint ? Why?arrow_forward
- You are the head of the project selection team at SIMSOX. Your team is considering three different projects. Based on past history, SIMSOX expects at least a rate of return of 20 percent. Given the following information for each project, which one should be SIMSOX's first priority? Should SIMSOX fund any of the other projects? (Use the NPV function in Excel to solve this problem. Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign.) Project: Dust Devils Year Investment 460,000 0 1 2 3 Project: Ospry Year Investment 410,000 0 TEZLO 1 2 4 Project: Voyagers Revenue Stream 0 Year Investment 0 107,000 1244TO 3 5 40,000 330,000 430,000 Revenue Stream 0 78,000 78,000 78,000 99,000 Revenue Stream 0 47,000 25,000 82,000 66,000 134,000 The NPV for Dust Devils is The NPV for Ospry is The NPV for Voyagers is How many projects should be funded?arrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardYou are the head of the project selection team at SIMSOX. Your team is considering three different projects. Based on past history. SIMSOX expects at least a rate of return of 23 percent. Given the following information for each project, which one should be SIMSOX's first priority? Should SIMSOX fund any of the other projects? (Use the NPV function in Excel to solve this problem. Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign.) Project: Dust Devils Year Investment Revenue Stream 550, 000 1 35,000 275,000 375,000 2 Project: Ospry Year Investment Revenue Stream 300,000 1 30,000 2 30,000 30,000 75,000 Project: Voyagers Year Investment Revenue Stream 85,000 1 25,000 25,000 60,000 2 3 4 55,000 145,000 The NPV for Dust Devils is The NPV for Ospry is The NPV for Voyagers is How many projects should be funded? undefinedarrow_forward
- Desai Industries is analyzing an average-risk project, and the following data have been developed. Unit sales will be constant, but the sales price should increase with inflation. Fixed costs will also be constant, but variable costs should rise with inflation. The project should last for 3 years, it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, and there will be no salvage value. No change in net operating working capital would be required. This is just one of many projects for the firm, so any losses on this project can be used to offset gains on other firm projects. What is the project's expected NPV? 10.0% $200,000 39,000 $25.00 WACC Net investment cost (depreciable basis) Units sold Average price per unit, Year 1 Fixed op. costs excl. depr. (constant) Variable op. cost/unit, Year 1 Annual depreciation rate Expected inflation rate per year Tax rate Oa. -$64.886 Ob. -$66,833 Oc. -$72,673 O d. -$73,970 O e. -$60,993 $150,000 $20.20 33.333% 5.00% 40.0%arrow_forward4. Investment timing options Companies often need to choose between making an investment now or waiting until the company can gather more relevant information about the potential project. This opportunity to wait before making the decision is called the investment timing option. Consider the case: Tolbotics Inc. is considering a three-year project that will require an initial investment of $44,000. If market demand is strong, Tolbotics Inc. thinks that the project will generate cash flows of $29,000 per year. However, if market demand is weak, the company believes that the project will generate cash flows of only $2,000 per year. The company thinks that there is a 50% chance that demand will be strong and a 50% chance that demand will be weak. If the company uses a project cost of capital of 12%, what will be the expected net present value (NPV) of this project? (Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole dollar.) -$7,111 O-$6,433 O-$7,788…arrow_forwardYour CEO insists that all projects should have a payback period of four or less. As a result attractive long lived projects are being turned down. The CEO is willing to switch to a discounted payback with same four year cutoff period. Would this be an improvement and which method you would suggest or emphasize more?arrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningIntermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningEBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning