a)
Whether it will increase or decrease the likelihood that a firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output when the firm's initial market share is small.
a)
Explanation of Solution
As the firm will produce a negative
Introduction: Competitors who collude covertly to coordinate their conduct by agreeing to share information but not explicitly exchanging it are said to be acting in collusion.
b)
Whether it will increase or decrease the likelihood that a firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output when the firm has a cost advantage over its rivals
b)
Explanation of Solution
The firm will lower the price by acting uncooperatively and increasing output. Since its competitors have higher expenses, they will lose money at the cheaper price while the company keeps making money. By raising its output, the company may be able to force its competitors out of business.
Therefore, there would be a decrease in the likelihood that the firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output in this case.
Introduction: Competitors who collude covertly to coordinate their conduct by agreeing to share information but not explicitly exchanging it are said to be acting in collusion.
c)
Whether it will increase or decrease the likelihood that a firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output when the firm's customers face additional costs at the time they switch from one firm's product to another firm's product.
c)
Explanation of Solution
There will be an increase in the likelihood that the firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output because the firm would need to significantly reduce its pricing with a corresponding increase in quantity so that it can persuade consumers to switch to its product as it is expensive for consumers to transfer products. It is, therefore, likely that increasing output will not be economical due to the large negative pricing effect.
Introduction: Competitors who collude covertly to coordinate their conduct by agreeing to share information but not explicitly exchanging it are said to be acting in collusion.
d)
Whether it will increase or decrease the likelihood that a firm will collude with other firms in an oligopoly market structure to limit the output when the firm and its rivals are currently operating at maximum production capacity, which cannot be changed in the short run
d)
Explanation of Solution
This will make it more likely for the company to collude in this case.
Due to its present production capacity, it is unable to expand sales, rendering attempts to undercut rivals' pricing as per the Bertrand model futile due to the inability to create the output required to win over the competitors' customers.
As a result, the decision to help limit output is somewhat alluring in this case.
Introduction: Competitors who collude covertly to coordinate their conduct by agreeing to share information but not explicitly exchanging it are said to be acting in collusion.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 64 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education