Concept explainers
Vehicle weights The Minnesota Department of Transportation hoped that they could measure the weights of big trucks without actually stopping the vehicles by using a newly developed “weight-in-motion” scale. To see if the new device was accurate, they conducted a calibration test. They weighed several stopped trucks (Static Weight) and assumed that this weight was correct. Then they weighed the trucks again while they were moving to see how well the new scale could estimate the actual weight. Their data are given in the table at the top of the next page.
Weights (1000s of lbs) | |
Weight-in-Motion | Static Weight |
26.0 | 27.9 |
29.9 | 29.1 |
39.5 | 38.0 |
25.1 | 27.0 |
31.6 | 30.3 |
36.2 | 34.5 |
25.1 | 27.8 |
31.0 | 29.6 |
35.6 | 33.1 |
40.2 | 35.5 |
- a) Make a
scatterplot for these data. - b) Describe the direction, form, and strength of the plot.
- c) Write a few sentences telling what the plot says about the data. (Note: The sentences should be about weighing trucks, not about scatterplots.)
- d) Find the
correlation . - e) If the trucks were weighed in kilograms, how would this change the correlation? (1 kilogram = 22 pounds)
- f) Do any points deviate from the overall pattern? What does the plot say about a possible recalibration of the weight-in-motion scale?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 6 Solutions
Intro STATS, Books a la Carte Plus New Mystatlab with Pearson Etext -- Access Card Package
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
College Algebra (Collegiate Math)
University Calculus: Early Transcendentals (4th Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (2nd Edition)
Introductory Statistics
APPLIED STAT.IN BUS.+ECONOMICS
- (b) Demonstrate that if X and Y are independent, then it follows that E(XY) E(X)E(Y);arrow_forward(d) Under what conditions do we say that a random variable X is integrable, specifically when (i) X is a non-negative random variable and (ii) when X is a general random variable?arrow_forward29. State the Borel-Cantelli Lemmas without proof. What is the primary distinction between Lemma 1 and Lemma 2?arrow_forward
- The masses measured on a population of 100 animals were grouped in the following table, after being recorded to the nearest gram Mass 89 90-109 110-129 130-149 150-169 170-189 > 190 Frequency 3 7 34 43 10 2 1 You are given that the sample mean of the data is 131.5 and the sample standard deviation is 20.0. Test the hypothesis that the distribution of masses follows a normal distribution at the 5% significance level.arrow_forwardstate without proof the uniqueness theorm of probability functionarrow_forward(a+b) R2L 2+2*0=? Ma state without proof the uniqueness theorm of probability function suppose thatPandQ are probability measures defined on the same probability space (Q, F)and that Fis generated by a π-system if P(A)=Q(A) tax for all A EthenP=Q i. e. P(A)=Q(A) for alla g // معدلة 2:23 صarrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt