It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed. To explain : It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

General Accounting question

Hello tutor please provide answer accounting questions

Answer?? Financial accounting

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Answer 6

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Answer 7

Chapter 6, Problem 42RSCQ

To determine

Introduction:

It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.

To explain:

It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 11

Ch. 6 - Prob. 1TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 2TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 3TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 4TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 5TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 6TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 7TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 8TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 9TFQ Ch. 6 - Prob. 10TFQ

Solution Summary: The author explains the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client.

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 6 Solutions