
(a)
Calculate the equivalent annual worth.
(a)

Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the cash flow of different models.
Table -1
Models | LA | IN | CO |
First cost (C) | -150,000 | -900,000 | |
AOC (MO) per year | -95,000 | -60,000 | -140,000 |
Salvage value (SV) | 25,000 | 300,000 | |
Time period (n) | 4 | 6 | 2 |
Interest (i) | 10% | 10% | 10% |
The equivalent annual worth of project LA (AWL) can be calculated as follows:
The annual worth of the project LA is -$136,933.88.
The equivalent annual worth of model IN (AWI) can be calculated as follows:
The annual worth of the model IN is -$227,764.2.
Since the annual worth of the project LA is greater than the other two project, select the project LA.
(b)
Calculate the present worth.
(b)

Explanation of Solution
The time period for project LA should be equated with the time period of project IN and CO to compare the present worth. The common time period for all the projects is 12 years. The present worth of project LA (PWL) can be calculated as follows:
The present worth of the project LA is -$933,024.6.
The time period for project IN should be equated with time period of project LA and CO to compare the present worth. The common time period for all the projects is 12 years. The present worth of project LA (PWL) can be calculated as follows:
The present worth of the project IN is -$1,551,913.97.
The time period for project CO should be equated with time period of project LA and IN to compare the present worth. The common time period for all the projects is 12 years. The present worth of project CO (PWC) can be calculated as follows:
The present worth of the project CO is -$953,916.18.
Since the present worth of the project LA is greater than the other two project, select the project LA.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Engineering Economy
- Q1. (Chap 1: Game Theory.) In the simultaneous games below player 1 is choosing between Top and Bottom, while player 2 is choosing between Left and Right. In each cell the first number is the payoff to player 1 and the second is the payoff to player 2. Part A: Player 1 Top Bottom Player 2 Left 25, 22 Right 27,23 26,21 28, 22 (A1) Does player 1 have a dominant strategy? (Yes/No) If your answer is yes, which one is it? (Top/Bottom) (A2) Does player 2 have a dominant strategy? (Yes/No.) If your answer is yes, which one is it? (Left/Right.) (A3) Can you solve this game by using the dominant strategy method? (Yes/No) If your answer is yes, what is the solution?arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forwardsubject to X1 X2 Maximize dollars of interest earned = 0.07X1+0.11X2+0.19X3+0.15X4 ≤ 1,000,000 <2,500,000 X3 ≤ 1,500,000 X4 ≤ 1,800,000 X3 + XA ≥ 0.55 (X1+X2+X3+X4) X1 ≥ 0.15 (X1+X2+X3+X4) X1 + X2 X3 + XA < 5,000,000 X1, X2, X3, X4 ≥ 0arrow_forward
- Unit VI Assignment Instructions: This assignment has two parts. Answer the questions using the charts. Part 1: Firm 1 High Price Low Price High Price 8,8 0,10 Firm 2 Low Price 10,0 3,3 Question: For the above game, identify the Nash Equilibrium. Does Firm 1 have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Does Firm 2 have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Your response:arrow_forwardnot use ai please don't kdjdkdkfjnxncjcarrow_forwardAsk one question at a time. Keep questions specific and include all details. Need more help? Subject matter experts with PhDs and Masters are standing by 24/7 to answer your question.**arrow_forward
- 1b. (5 pts) Under the 1990 Farm Bill and given the initial situation of a target price and marketing loan, indicate where the market price (MP), quantity supplied (QS) and demanded (QD), government stocks (GS), and Deficiency Payments (DP) and Marketing Loan Gains (MLG), if any, would be on the graph below. If applicable, indicate the price floor (PF) on the graph. TP $ NLR So Do Q/yrarrow_forwardNow, let us assume that Brie has altruistic preferences. Her utility function is now given by: 1 UB (xA, YA, TB,YB) = (1/2) (2x+2y) + (2x+2y) What would her utility be at the endowment now? (Round off your answer to the nearest whole number.) 110arrow_forwardProblema 4 (20 puntos): Supongamos que tenemos un ingreso de $120 y enfrentamos los precios P₁ =6 y P₂ =4. Nuestra función de utilidad es: U(x1, x2) = x0.4x0.6 a) Planteen el problema de optimización y obtengan las condiciones de primer orden. b) Encuentren el consumo óptimo de x1 y x2. c) ¿Cómo cambiará nuestra elección óptima si el ingreso aumenta a $180?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





