Concept explainers
To determine: The approximate mean number of errors that changed from prenatal population to the seventh generation of fast rat population. Also, determine the type of selection in this form of heredity.
Introduction: The rats were intentionally mated through the selective breeding to demonstrate the particular
Explanation of Solution
The behavioural variation in the rats was determined by an experiment throughout several generations. The rats that have a genetically diverse group to find the maze by making few errors were labeled with bright, and those who were error-prone were labelled dull. The mating was performed between bright-bright, and dull-dull rats upto the seven generations. The scientist concluded that both types of rats remained genetically separate. The dependent variables concluded the mean number of errors that were made in rats in several trials. The further mating of the dull mother with bright offspring concluded that bright rats were making lesser errors than the dull rats.
The experiment was performed through the artificial selection of the rats that demonstrated the flexibility in the learning ability of rats in response to the environmental factors.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 53 Solutions
2 SEM ACC W/RAVEN CARDED
- Suppose that a population is at equilibrium between mutation and selection for a deleterious recessive allele, where s = 0.5 and μ = 10−5. What is the equilibrium frequency of the allele? What is the selection cost?arrow_forwardIn a population of locusts, the mean wing length is 47 mm, the selection gradient on wing length is β = 0.12/mm, the phenotypic variance for wing length is P = 3.6 mm2, and the heritability of wing length is h2 = 0.27. In addition, we know that the additive genetic covariance between wing and leg length is 0.60 mm2. What is the expected evolutionary change in mean leg length due to selection on both wings and legs? Repeat these calculations to predict what will happen to wing length as a result of the selection on both wings and legs. What do you predict the average wing and leg lengths will be in the next generation?arrow_forwardA population sample of 300 individuals is studied for the electrophoretic mobility of an enzyme that varies according to the genotype determined by 2 alleles, E and T of a single gene. The results are 7 individuals with genotype EE, 106 with genotype ET, and 187 with genotype TT. What are the allele frequencies of E and T, and what are the expected numbers of the 3 genotypes if random mating is assumed?arrow_forward
- Which type of selection (directional, disruptive, stabilizing) changes the overall average phenotype in a population? How does it do this? What does "additive” mean? Why aren't dominant and epistatic variances considered to be additive?arrow_forwardThe forward mutation rate for piebald spotting in guinea pigs is 8 × 10-5;the reverse mutation rate is 2 × 10-6. If no other evolutionary forces areassumed to be acting, what is the expected frequency of the allele forpiebald spotting in a population that is in mutational equilibrium?arrow_forwardYou observe some bark beetles with different feeding behaviors. You find that the behavioral phenotypes you observed are closely associated with the following genotypes. genotype phenotype number observed BB feeds under bark 60 Bb feeds on top of bark 24 bb feeds on leaves 16 a) What are the allele frequencies and the expected number (out of 100 beetles) of genotypes? b) Calculate the Chi-Squared value (c2). Then look up the p-value using this Chi-squared calculator: https://www.mathsisfun.com/data//chi-square-calculator.html Enter “1” for Degrees of Freedom. (There are 3 genotype categories, but only 1 DF because they are not fully independent—calculated from just 2 allele frequencies). The p-value is the probability that you would see the deviance you observed by chance, assuming the null hypothesis is true). Report both values. Is the population in H-W equilibrium? c) If you answered “No” to b): Provide at least three biologically…arrow_forward
- The frequency of the A1 allele is p = 0.4, and that of the A2 allele is q = 0.6. The observed genotype frequencies are as follows: f(A1A1) = 0.25 f(A1A2) = 0.36 f(A2A2) = 0.39 Is there a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the population?arrow_forwardIn this version of the simulation (500 population size; 500 carrying capacity), all fish are equally likely (though not 100% likely) to survive and reproduce. There are no mutations, nor are there any entering or leaving the population. When they reproduce, they choose a mate from the pool at random and produce ten offspring by chance with the probability of the offspring’s genotypes determined by the punnett square. What caused the allele frequencies to change and vary in the trials? (ex attached).arrow_forwardIn a population of 10,000 individuals, where 3600 are MM, 1600 are Mm, and 4800 are mm, what are the frequencies of the M alleles and the m alleles? M= 0.7; m = 0.3 M= 0.6; m = 0.4 М-0.8; т %3D 0.2 M= 0.9; m = 0.1 M= 0.5; m = 0.5arrow_forward
- Use the equation p2+2pq+q2+1.0 to solve the following problem. In a population of 100 squirrels there are 64 black ones, and the remaining are white. Black (B) is the dominant allele, and the white (b) is the recessive allele. If the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, what is the frequency of the black squirrels that are heterozygous (BB) for their coat color. A. 0.48 B. 0.16 C.0.40 D. 0.32 E.0.64arrow_forwardI've observed varying egg mimic sizes on female fins: large, small, or none. I found that this trait follows Mendelian genetics with a single locus having two alleles: BB (large mimic), Bb (small mimic), and bb (no mimic). During a recent collection trip, we gathered 211 males with large egg mimics, 156 with small mimics, and 28 with no mimics. Is the locus in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and what's the expected frequency of the small egg mimic phenotype in this population? 1.Yes it is in HW equilibrium, expected = 0.07 2.Yes it is in HW equilibrium, expected = 0.39 3.No it is not in HW equilibrium, expected = 0.53 4.No it is not in HW equilibrium, expected = 0.20 5.No it is not in HW equilibrium, expected = 1.0arrow_forwardThere are two existing hypotheses for an unusually high frequency of a deleterious recessive allele in a certain population other than it is hidden in the heterozygous genotype and not exposed to selection. Explain what these two likely hypotheses are and how you could distinguish between them based on your understanding of the applicable assumptions that are part of the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Modelarrow_forward
- Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSONBiology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxAnatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
- Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyLaboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education