Macroeconomics (Fourth Edition)
Macroeconomics (Fourth Edition)
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780393603767
Author: Charles I. Jones
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 5, Problem 6E

(a)

To determine

The ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U’s steady state.

(a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The Solow economy is a steady state economy where the level of investment and the level of depreciation in the economy would be the same. This means that the new investment in the economy will only be able to repair and restore the level of depreciation in the economy. This maintains the economy in a steady state and that is known as the Solow’s steady state.

In the case of Country U and Country S, the ratio of per capita GDP can be calculated when there is no change in TFP or in the rate of depreciation across countries. The key equation used in this case is as follows:

y*=Y*L*=A¯3/2(s¯d¯)1/2

The value of the depreciation and TFP does not change and that means the only value and changes will be the investment rates for the two economies. The equation can be enlarged as follows:

y*sy*US=(A¯sA¯US)3/2×(s¯ ss¯ US)1/2y*sy*US=(s¯ ss¯ US)1/2=(32.124.7)1/2=1.299595=1.141

It is identified that Country S has more investment than Country U, and it means that Country S would be richer than Country U. The difference in the per capita GDP between Countries U and S is calculated to be 14.1 percent than Country U’s level. Similarly, the difference between Country U and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:

CountryInvestment rate s¯ (percent)Ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state (percent)
US24.7-
Switzerla32.114.1
Hokong26.23.1
Fran25.00.6
Jap29.08.3
South Kore35.019.0
Argentin16.0-19.5
Mexic21.1-9.2
Thailan26.43.4
Indi23.3-2.9
Keny11.1-33.3
Ethiopi10.4-36.4
Economics Concept Introduction

Economic growth: Economic growth is the increase in the output of goods and services produced per head of the population over a period of time in an economy.

(b)

To determine

The ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U’s steady state with TFP differences.

(b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

When there is difference in TFP of the economy, the equation would change as follows:

y*sy*US=(1.0221)3/2×(32.124.7)1/2=1.03×1.14=1.178

It is identified that Country S has more TFP than Country U, and it means that Country S would push the steady-state level higher than Country U’s level by 18 percent. Similarly, the difference between Country U’s and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:

CountryInvestment rate s¯ (percent)TFPRatio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state with TFP differences (percent)
US24.71.000-
Switzerla32.11.02217.8
Hokong26.20.835-13.0
Fran25.00.688-34.9
Jap29.00.680-36.0
South Kore35.00.711-31.7
Argentin16.00.534-55.6
Mexic21.10.438-67.1
Thailan26.40.381-73.2
Indi23.30.240-80.3
Keny11.10.178-91.4
Ethiopi10.40.102-96.3

(c)

To determine

The percentage gap between the steady-state income ratio and the ratio in 2014.

(c)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The income ratio of Country S is 114.7 percent, whereas the steady-state level with TFP differences is 117.8. Therefore, the gap between the current position and the steady state position can be calculated as follows:

gap between current and steady state=Steady stateCurrentCurrent×100=117.8114.7114.7×100=3.1114.7×100=0.027×100=2.7

Thus, it shows that Country S is slightly below its steady state position. Similarly, the gap between the current and the steady state position for other countries can be calculated and tabulated as follows:

CountryInvestment rate s¯ (percent)TFPRatio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state (percent)Ratio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state  with TFP differences (percent)Gap between current and steady state level
US24.71.000---
Switzerla32.11.02214.117.82.70
Hokong26.20.8353.1-13.0-15.62
Fran25.00.6880.6-34.9-35.23
Jap29.00.6808.3-36.0-40.90
South Kore35.00.71119.0-31.7-42.61
Argentin16.00.534-19.5-55.6-44.84
Mexic21.10.438-9.2-67.1-63.77
Thailan26.40.3813.4-73.2-74.08
Indi23.30.240-2.9-80.3-79.71
Keny11.10.178-33.3-91.4-87.11
Ethiopi10.40.102-36.4-96.3-94.18

(d)

To determine

The countries ranked based on the transition dynamics.

(d)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The countries that have higher differences between the current state and the steady-state level would grow faster and when the countries reach close to their steady-state level, the economic growth would be slower and slower. This is suggested by the transition dynamics in the economy. The ranking will be in reverse order, which means that the economy with the highest growth rate will be Country E and least growth will be Country U.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider the simple discrete job search model that we studied in class. Only the unemployed can receive one offer per period from F(w) that is a uniform distribution on [0,2]. There is a constant probability of being laid off at the end of each period while employed. Assume that she can get a new offer right away when laid off. We want to understand the reservation wage, WR, in this model. Assume that u(c) = c. The parameters are a discount factor ẞ and an unemployment benefit b.R and show that T is contraction on [0, ∞). Explicitly state any additional assumptions that you may need.(Grading guide line: 5pt for the exact form of T, 10pt for showing contraction, and 5pt for stating correct assumptions.)< (b) Discuss why (a) is useful to understand the reservation wage wд in this economy.< (c) We write WR = WR (b,ẞ,λ) to reveal its dependence on (b,ẞ,λ). Show that 0 ≤ aWR дь OWR дл ≤1 and ≥0. What about ? awR ав State any additional assumptions that you may need.< (d) Briefly explain the…
3. Consider the market for paper. The process of producing paper creates pollution. Assume that the marginal damage function for pollution is given by: MDF = 3E where damages are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. Assume further that the function describing the marginal abatement cost of emissions is given by MAC 120-E where benefits are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. a. Graph the marginal damage function (MDF) and the marginal abatement cost function (MAC). b. What is the unregulated level of emissions Eu? What is the social welfare of this emissions level? c. Assume an existing emission quota limits emissions to E = 60. Show on the graph why this policy is inefficient. What is the deadweight loss caused by this policy?
show written calculation for B
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Text book image
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:9781337613057
Author:Tucker
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781337111522
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,