(a)
The ratio of per capita
(a)
Explanation of Solution
The Solow economy is a steady state economy where the level of investment and the level of
In the case of Country U and Country S, the ratio of per capita GDP can be calculated when there is no change in TFP or in the rate of depreciation across countries. The key equation used in this case is as follows:
The value of the depreciation and TFP does not change and that means the only value and changes will be the investment rates for the two economies. The equation can be enlarged as follows:
It is identified that Country S has more investment than Country U, and it means that Country S would be richer than Country U. The difference in the per capita GDP between Countries U and S is calculated to be 14.1 percent than Country U’s level. Similarly, the difference between Country U and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:
Country | Investment rate | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state (percent) |
US | 24.7 | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 14.1 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 3.1 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.6 |
Jap | 29.0 | 8.3 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 19.0 |
Argentin | 16.0 | -19.5 |
Mexic | 21.1 | -9.2 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 3.4 |
Indi | 23.3 | -2.9 |
Keny | 11.1 | -33.3 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | -36.4 |
(b)
The ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U’s steady state with TFP differences.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
When there is difference in TFP of the economy, the equation would change as follows:
It is identified that Country S has more TFP than Country U, and it means that Country S would push the steady-state level higher than Country U’s level by 18 percent. Similarly, the difference between Country U’s and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:
Country | Investment rate | TFP | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state with TFP differences (percent) |
US | 24.7 | 1.000 | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 1.022 | 17.8 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 0.835 | -13.0 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.688 | -34.9 |
Jap | 29.0 | 0.680 | -36.0 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 0.711 | -31.7 |
Argentin | 16.0 | 0.534 | -55.6 |
Mexic | 21.1 | 0.438 | -67.1 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 0.381 | -73.2 |
Indi | 23.3 | 0.240 | -80.3 |
Keny | 11.1 | 0.178 | -91.4 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | 0.102 | -96.3 |
(c)
The percentage gap between the steady-state income ratio and the ratio in 2014.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
The income ratio of Country S is 114.7 percent, whereas the steady-state level with TFP differences is 117.8. Therefore, the gap between the current position and the steady state position can be calculated as follows:
Thus, it shows that Country S is slightly below its steady state position. Similarly, the gap between the current and the steady state position for other countries can be calculated and tabulated as follows:
Country | Investment rate | TFP | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state (percent) | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state with TFP differences (percent) | Gap between current and steady state level |
US | 24.7 | 1.000 | - | - | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 1.022 | 14.1 | 17.8 | 2.70 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 0.835 | 3.1 | -13.0 | -15.62 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.688 | 0.6 | -34.9 | -35.23 |
Jap | 29.0 | 0.680 | 8.3 | -36.0 | -40.90 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 0.711 | 19.0 | -31.7 | -42.61 |
Argentin | 16.0 | 0.534 | -19.5 | -55.6 | -44.84 |
Mexic | 21.1 | 0.438 | -9.2 | -67.1 | -63.77 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 0.381 | 3.4 | -73.2 | -74.08 |
Indi | 23.3 | 0.240 | -2.9 | -80.3 | -79.71 |
Keny | 11.1 | 0.178 | -33.3 | -91.4 | -87.11 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | 0.102 | -36.4 | -96.3 | -94.18 |
(d)
The countries ranked based on the transition dynamics.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
The countries that have higher differences between the current state and the steady-state level would grow faster and when the countries reach close to their steady-state level, the economic growth would be slower and slower. This is suggested by the transition dynamics in the economy. The ranking will be in reverse order, which means that the economy with the highest growth rate will be Country E and least growth will be Country U.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Macroeconomics (Fourth Edition)
- Problem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward
- 4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forward
- I need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forward
- al Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forwardHow did Jennifer Lopez use free enterprise to become successful ?arrow_forwardAn actuary analyzes a company’s annual personal auto claims, M and annual commercialauto claims, N . The analysis reveals that V ar(M ) = 1600, V ar(N ) = 900, and thecorrelation between M and N is ρ = 0.64. Compute V ar(M + N ).arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co