
(a)
The ratio of per capita
(a)

Explanation of Solution
The Solow economy is a steady state economy where the level of investment and the level of
In the case of Country U and Country S, the ratio of per capita GDP can be calculated when there is no change in TFP or in the rate of depreciation across countries. The key equation used in this case is as follows:
The value of the depreciation and TFP does not change and that means the only value and changes will be the investment rates for the two economies. The equation can be enlarged as follows:
It is identified that Country S has more investment than Country U, and it means that Country S would be richer than Country U. The difference in the per capita GDP between Countries U and S is calculated to be 14.1 percent than Country U’s level. Similarly, the difference between Country U and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:
Country | Investment rate | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state (percent) |
US | 24.7 | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 14.1 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 3.1 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.6 |
Jap | 29.0 | 8.3 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 19.0 |
Argentin | 16.0 | -19.5 |
Mexic | 21.1 | -9.2 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 3.4 |
Indi | 23.3 | -2.9 |
Keny | 11.1 | -33.3 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | -36.4 |
(b)
The ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U’s steady state with TFP differences.
(b)

Explanation of Solution
When there is difference in TFP of the economy, the equation would change as follows:
It is identified that Country S has more TFP than Country U, and it means that Country S would push the steady-state level higher than Country U’s level by 18 percent. Similarly, the difference between Country U’s and all other countries can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:
Country | Investment rate | TFP | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to Country U in steady state with TFP differences (percent) |
US | 24.7 | 1.000 | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 1.022 | 17.8 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 0.835 | -13.0 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.688 | -34.9 |
Jap | 29.0 | 0.680 | -36.0 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 0.711 | -31.7 |
Argentin | 16.0 | 0.534 | -55.6 |
Mexic | 21.1 | 0.438 | -67.1 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 0.381 | -73.2 |
Indi | 23.3 | 0.240 | -80.3 |
Keny | 11.1 | 0.178 | -91.4 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | 0.102 | -96.3 |
(c)
The percentage gap between the steady-state income ratio and the ratio in 2014.
(c)

Explanation of Solution
The income ratio of Country S is 114.7 percent, whereas the steady-state level with TFP differences is 117.8. Therefore, the gap between the current position and the steady state position can be calculated as follows:
Thus, it shows that Country S is slightly below its steady state position. Similarly, the gap between the current and the steady state position for other countries can be calculated and tabulated as follows:
Country | Investment rate | TFP | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state (percent) | Ratio of per capita GDP relative to US in steady state with TFP differences (percent) | Gap between current and steady state level |
US | 24.7 | 1.000 | - | - | - |
Switzerla | 32.1 | 1.022 | 14.1 | 17.8 | 2.70 |
Hokong | 26.2 | 0.835 | 3.1 | -13.0 | -15.62 |
Fran | 25.0 | 0.688 | 0.6 | -34.9 | -35.23 |
Jap | 29.0 | 0.680 | 8.3 | -36.0 | -40.90 |
South Kore | 35.0 | 0.711 | 19.0 | -31.7 | -42.61 |
Argentin | 16.0 | 0.534 | -19.5 | -55.6 | -44.84 |
Mexic | 21.1 | 0.438 | -9.2 | -67.1 | -63.77 |
Thailan | 26.4 | 0.381 | 3.4 | -73.2 | -74.08 |
Indi | 23.3 | 0.240 | -2.9 | -80.3 | -79.71 |
Keny | 11.1 | 0.178 | -33.3 | -91.4 | -87.11 |
Ethiopi | 10.4 | 0.102 | -36.4 | -96.3 | -94.18 |
(d)
The countries ranked based on the transition dynamics.
(d)

Explanation of Solution
The countries that have higher differences between the current state and the steady-state level would grow faster and when the countries reach close to their steady-state level, the economic growth would be slower and slower. This is suggested by the transition dynamics in the economy. The ranking will be in reverse order, which means that the economy with the highest growth rate will be Country E and least growth will be Country U.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Problem 2. If the consumer preference can be represented by a CES function with δ = 0.5, i.e. u(x, y) = x0.5 + y0.5. Let the prices and income be (px, py, w). 1. Set up the Lagrangian expression.2. Take the first-order conditions.3. Substitute into budget constraint to derive the optimal consumption bundles.arrow_forward1. A town relies on four different sources for its non-drinking water needs: dam water, reclaimed water, rain water, and desalinated water. The different sources carry different risks and costs. For instance, desalinated water is fully reliable due to abundant sea water, but it is more expensive than other options. Reclaimed water also has relatively lower risk than rain or dam water since a certain amount can be obtained, even during the dry. season, by the treatment of daily generated waste water. Using any of the four options requires an investment in that resource. The return on a particular water source is defined as the amount of water generated by the source per dollar of investment in it. The expected returns and standard deviations of those returns for the four water sources are described in the following table: Water resource Expected return St. Deviation Dam water 2.7481 0.2732 Reclaimed water 1.6005 0.0330 Rain water 0.5477 0.2865 Desalinated water 0.3277 0.0000 Higher…arrow_forward1. Imagine a society that produces military goods and consumer goods, which we'll call "guns" and "butter." a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for guns and butter. Using the concept of opportunity cost, explain why it most likely has a bowed-out shape. b. Show a point that is impossible for the economy to achieve. Show a point that is feasible but inefficient. c. Imagine that the society has two political parties, called the Hawks (who want a strong military) and the Doves (who want a smaller military). Show a point on your production possibilities frontier that the Hawks might choose and a point the Doves might choose. d. Imagine that an aggressive neighboring country reduces the size of its military. As a result, both the Hawks and the Doves reduce their desired production of guns by the same amount. Which party would get the bigger "peace dividend," measured by the increase in butter production? Explain.arrow_forward
- A health study tracked a group of persons for five years. At the beginning of the study, 20%were classified as heavy smokers, 30% as light smokers, and 50% as nonsmokers. Resultsof the study showed that light smokers were twice as likely as nonsmokers to die duringthe five-year study, but only half as likely as heavy smokers.A randomly selected participant from the study died during the five-year period. Calculatethe probability that the participant was a heavy smokerarrow_forwardConsider two assets with the following returns: State Prob. of state R₁ R2 1 23 13 25% 5% 2 -10% 1% Compute the optimal portfolio for an investor having a Bernoulli utility of net returns u(r) = 2√√r+ 10. Compute the certainty equivalent of the optimal portfolio. Do the results change if short-selling is not allowed? If so, how?arrow_forwardIn the graph at the right, the average variable cost is curve ☐. The average total cost is curve marginal cost is curve The C Cost per Unit ($) Per Unit Costs A 0 Output Quantity Barrow_forward
- What are some of the question s that I can ask my economic teacher?arrow_forwardAnswer question 2 only.arrow_forward1. A pension fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The first is a stock fund, the second is a long-term government and corporate fund, and the third is a (riskless) T-bill money market fund that yields a rate of 8%. The probability distributions of the risky funds have the following characteristics: Standard Deviation (%) Expected return (%) Stock fund (Rs) 20 30 Bond fund (RB) 12 15 The correlation between the fund returns is .10.arrow_forward
- Frederick Jones operates a sole proprietorship business in Trinidad and Tobago. His gross annual revenue in 2023 was $2,000,000. He wants to register for VAT, but he is unsure of what VAT entails, the requirements for registration and what he needs to do to ensure that he is fully compliant with VAT regulations. Make reference to the Vat Act of Trinidad and Tobago and explain to Mr. Jones what VAT entails, the requirements for registration and the requirements to be fully compliant with VAT regulations.arrow_forwardCan you show me the answers for parts a and b? Thanks.arrow_forwardWhat are the answers for parts a and b? Thanksarrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co





