One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be allowed or not.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Identify specific needs of public and the relevant branch of the criminal justice system at the center if departmental policy justifying drunk driving your identification.

I need help with this I need to describe 3 of Marx’s predictions, citing or quoting parts of his writings wherethese predictions were made. Then you will assess how well these predictions fit with the worldtoday using facts/evidence from at least 5 trustworthy sources. My 3 Mar´s Predictios are 1. Capitalist societies would increasingly become divided into just two classes, bourgeoisieand proletariat 2. As capital accumulates, the surplus population would grow over time, and more and morepeople would fall into poverty (i.e., the general law of capitalist accumulation) 3. There would be an increasing level of conflict between capitalists and wage-laborers Now I need evidence and reliable sources wherever they can be found. Reliable sources that provide facts or evidence that allow me to assess whether Marx's predictions were correct (or to what extent they were). Appropriate sources for this work are academic articles, research reports, books published by universities, and newspaper…

Treatment Recommendations The transcript below is the entire diagnosis and treatment phase of a primary care encounterinvolving a mom and her sick daughter who has had symptoms of sore throat and fever.Address these two questions regarding the doctor’s treatment recommendations. Question 1: Affirmative treatment recommendations:Focus on the doctor’s affirmative recommendations, which are mainly for over-the-countermedications (not prescriptions), in lines 71-72, 78-79, 82-86, and 123-134 (in boldface).• 1a: Using the recommendation formats sketched by Heritage in his last lecture(pronouncement/proposal/suggestion/offer/assertion), which format or formats is thedoctor using? Explain.• 1b: Given your answer to 1a, how would you characterize the doctor’s overall style ofrecommendation? Are they relatively authoritative or relatively collaborative in theirapproach, and to what extent? Question 2: Ruling out antibiotics:Before getting to the affirmative recommendations, the doctor rules out…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Answer 6

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.

Answer 7

Chapter 5, Problem 1FYC-156

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction:

One must consider the basic tenets of sociological research, which are openness, honesty, truthfulness, and protecting the researcher’s subjects from harm, when deciding if such research should be

allowed or not.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested responses:

In Milgram’s experiment, subjects were deceived about what was actually taking place in the experiment, and were exposed to extreme emotional duress, and some critics say they were not adequately debriefed afterward. Some participants were told they were merely assisting when they were actually the subjects, and the experimenter’s actual assistants were positioned as volunteers in the famous and infamous experiment involving administering higher and higher voltages of electric shocks to other participants, an activity falsely positioned as a “learning and memory” experiment.

While no electric shocks were actually administered, participants were led to believe that they were causing extreme and increasing pain to those they were “shocking” for giving incorrect answers. Milgram himself believed that the criticism of his experiment was based on the reluctance to accept such negative revelations about human nature, as the majority of the subjects increased the “voltage” to the highest possible level upon command from the experimenter, despite the “screams” from the recipient and even when given the option to withdraw.

The findings did indeed provide significant information about obedience and authority, gave insights into the crimes of the Nazi regime, and continue to have far-reaching implications for the military, the penal system, law enforcement, and human interaction with authority in general. The experiment proved that regular people can become willing agents of horrific acts, with little ability or inclination to resist authority. The social science community is divided on whether that valuable knowledge and its applications justify violating the sociological code of ethics.