A person JT is the owner of a commercial bakery which produces a variety of goods. The person JT was required to conduct a test on the food products for contamination at his plant. He did not present the results to the U.S Drug and Food Administration Officials as he was not required to do so. He asked his employees to repeatedly conduct the test until it comes out negative. The products with salmonella contamination were sent for sale to retailers. Five persons who consumed the bakery products were taken ill and one even died of infection. To explain : The selling of products which tested positive for salmonella contamination was ethical.

Question

Business Ethics. Jason Trevor owns a commercial bakery in Blakely. Georgia. that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Trevor is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. On three occasions, the tests of food products containing peanut butter were positive for salmonella contamination. Trevor was not required to report the results to U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, however, so he did not. Instead. Trevor instructed his employees to simply repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella were eventually shipped out to retailers.Five people who ate Trevor's baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection. Even though Trevor's conduct was legal, was it unethical for him to sell goods that had once tested positive for salmonella? Why or why not? (See Business Ethics.)

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1BS

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A person JT is the owner of a commercial bakery which produces a variety of goods. The person JT was required to conduct a test on the food products for contamination at his plant. He did not present the results to the U.S Drug and Food Administration Officials as he was not required to do so. He asked his employees to repeatedly conduct the test until it comes out negative. The products with salmonella contamination were sent for sale to retailers. Five persons who consumed the bakery products were taken ill and one even died of infection.

To explain : The selling of products which tested positive for salmonella contamination was ethical.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Business Ethics. Jason Trevor owns a commercial bakery in Blakely. Georgia. that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Trevor is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. On three occasions, the tests of food products containing peanut butter were positive for salmonella contamination. Trevor was not required to report the results to U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, however, so he did not. Instead. Trevor instructed his employees to simply repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella were eventually shipped out to retailers.Five people who ate Trevor's baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection. Even though Trevor's conduct was legal, was it unethical for him to sell goods that had once tested positive for salmonella? Why or why not? (See Business Ethics.)

Spotlight on Dress Code Policies—DiscriminationBased on Gender. Burlington Coat FactoryWarehouse, Inc., had a dress code that required malesalesclerks to wear business attire consisting of slacks,shirt, and a necktie. Female salesclerks, by contrast,were required to wear a smock so that customers could readilyidentify them. Karen O’Donnell and other female employeesrefused to wear smocks. Instead they reported to work in businessattire and were suspended. After numerous suspensions, thefemale employees were fired for violating Burlington’s dress codepolicy. All other conditions of employment, including salary,hours, and benefits, were the same for female and male employees. Was the dress code policy discriminatory? Why or why not?[O’Donnell v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., 656 F.Supp.263 (S.D. Ohio 1987)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.)

Connor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?