a) Generalize the result in part (a) of Exercise 196; that is, show that if p is a prime, the positive integers less than p , except 1 and p − 1 , can be split into ( p − 3 ) / 2 pairs of integers such that each pair consist of integers that are inverses of each other [Hint: Use the result of Exercise 17.] b) From part (a) conclude that ( p − 1 ) ! ≡ − 1 ( mod p ) whenever p is prime. This result is known as Wilson’s theorem. c) What can we conclude if n is a positive integer such that ( n − 1 ) ! ≠ − 1 ( mod n ) ?
a) Generalize the result in part (a) of Exercise 196; that is, show that if p is a prime, the positive integers less than p , except 1 and p − 1 , can be split into ( p − 3 ) / 2 pairs of integers such that each pair consist of integers that are inverses of each other [Hint: Use the result of Exercise 17.] b) From part (a) conclude that ( p − 1 ) ! ≡ − 1 ( mod p ) whenever p is prime. This result is known as Wilson’s theorem. c) What can we conclude if n is a positive integer such that ( n − 1 ) ! ≠ − 1 ( mod n ) ?
Solution Summary: The author explains that positive integers less than p can be split into (p - 3)/2 pairs such that each pair consists of inverses of each other.
a) Generalize the result in part (a) of Exercise 196; that is, show that if p is a prime, the positive integers less than p, except 1 and
p
−
1
, can be split into
(
p
−
3
)
/
2
pairs of integers such that each pair consist of integers that are inverses of each other [Hint: Use the result of Exercise 17.]
b) From part (a) conclude that
(
p
−
1
)
!
≡
−
1
(
mod
p
)
whenever p is prime. This result is known as Wilson’s theorem.
c) What can we conclude if n is a positive integer such that
(
n
−
1
)
!
≠
−
1
(
mod
n
)
?
2. Consider the negative binomial distribution with parameters r,p and having pmf
nb(x;r,p) =
Ꮖ
(* + r − ¹) p*(1 − p)²
p'(1-p) x = 0, 1, 2, 3, … ….
(a) Supposer 2, then show that
T-1
p =
X+r−1
is an unbiased estimator for p. (Hint: write out E(p), then cancel out x+r −1 inside
the sum).
(b) A reporter wishing to interview five individuals who support a certain candidate (for
presidency?) begins asking people whether they support (S) or not support (F) the can-
didate.
If they observe the following sequence of responses SFFSfffffffffffSSS, esti-
mate p the true proportion of people who support the candidate.
How does the estimate change if the following sequence of responses were observed
ssssfffffffffffffs.
Does it matter to the estimate when the first four S's appear in the sequence of responses?
Let A =
23
231
3 54
Find a basis for Row A.
Find a basis for Col A.
Find a basis for Nul A.
7
in Nul A? Why or why not?
2
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.