Case summary: The company RTI has its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, maintenance and storing facility in Massachusetts, and deals in freight business on the U.S. Eastern Coast mostly. All the freight carriers of RTI were purchased from other states. The State of Massachusetts levies a use tax on all persons within its jurisdiction, including persons doing interstate business. The Massachusetts state further levies a tax on the purchase price of individual carriers, including trucks and trailers of RTI.
To explain:The fundamental aspects of commerce clause when a state law has implications on interstate trade.
Case summary: The company RTI has its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, maintenance and storing facility in Massachusetts, and deals in freight business on the U.S. Eastern Coast mostly. All the freight carriers of RTI were purchased from other states. The State of Massachusetts levies a use tax on all persons within its jurisdiction, including persons doing interstate business. The Massachusetts state further levies a tax on the purchase price of individual carriers, including trucks and trailers of the company RTI.
To explain:The use tax levied by Massachusetts on the company RTI is justified under the commerce clause.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
- For the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Ioncorp sells cabinets nationwide to the furniture company Blinkorp. It makes an agreement that Blinkorp will only sell Ioncorp cabinets in its warehouses. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forwardZTC was founded in 1956 by a British national, Mr. Roy Smith, in a British colony then known as Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). The company’s core business was transporting copper from the mines in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) to Southern Rhodesia for onward transmission to overseas markets in Europe. This arrangement worked smoothly until 1965. On 11th November 1965, the white settlers in Southern Rhodesia, who were principally of British origin, unilaterally declared political independence from Britain. Most countries roundly condemned the action by the white settlers because not only were the white settlers a minority but the independence that had been declared was perceived to be for the whites and not the African black majority. To the African majority, the declaration of independence by the white settles was merely a transfer of colonial power from Britain to the local white settlers and was therefore considered by Africans and their sympathisers to be slap in the face of…arrow_forwardApfel manufactures smartphones in the United States and sells them nationwide. Apfel contracts with Big Box to make it the exclusive distributor of Apfel smartphones in California. In the contract, Apfel specifies that it would not sell its smartphones to any other retailer within a 20-mile radius of a Big Box store. In its California stores, Big Box has a unique pricing policy. It charges a higher price to its business customers, while giving non-business customers a 10 percent discount off the list price. Apfels's distribution policy in New York differs from that in California. In New York, Apfel does not reject any distributor's request to sell Apfel smartphones. However, Apfel requires that New York distributors sign contracts agreeing not to sell Apfel products below the prices specified by Apfel in a monthly "price list." In contracts with its distributors in all other states, Apfel insists that sales of its smartphones be tied to a data plan. No consumer can purchase an Apfel…arrow_forward
- Ioncorp sells cabinets nationwide to the furniture company Blinkorp. It makes an agreement that Blinkorp will only sell Ioncorp cabinets in its warehouses. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forwardFor the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Guncorp is selling rifles to a retailer Sportsacorp. In order for Sportsacorp to purchase a shipment of rifles, Guncorp requires that Sportsacorp also purchase a shipment of pistols. Legal Illegal, depending on impact Impossible to determine legality Strictly illegalarrow_forwardGlobal Crossing The company was founded in 1997 to provide a trans-Atlantic cable to carry telephone and data traffic. Using high-bandwidth optical fiber, the company was able to sell capacity at less than half the price of existing competitors. After six months of operations, Global Crossing offered stock to the public, and the resulting price valued the firm at an astounding $19 billion. Six months later it was valued at $38 billion, more than the Ford Motor Company. The cable technology was not proprietary and data-carrying capacity was a commodity. That meant that customers could easily switch from one supplier to another, putting them in a powerful bargaining position. Furthermore, customers were price-sensitive. Even worse, the threat of entry was high, and other companies were entering the business, fueled by easy financing. High fixed costs but near-zero marginal costs (the cost to carry one more piece of data) led to fierce price competition within the industry. As new…arrow_forward
- Private provision of public goods may create positive externalities. True or false, and explainarrow_forwardKwaku Issaka is a 14-year boy from a wealthy home. On 21st May 2021, Kwaku Issaka entered a shop in Accra to purchase the following items: PlayStation 5 iPhone 13 Three pairs of men’s formal shoes made by Alexander Kwaku Issaka did not have enough money to pay for all the items at once. He, therefore, entered into an agreement with the shop owner, Mr. Boateng, to pay the outstanding amount owed in five installments. However, after paying the first installment, Kwaku Issaka fell into arrears. The two parties then entered into another agreement under which Kwaku Issaka was to work for Mr. Boateng for a year without any salary for Kwaku Issaka’s debt to be forgiven. Kwaku Issaka has started working, but the work is affecting his school activities to the extent that he was last in his class. Kwaku Issaka’s parents have approached you as a renowned expert in contract law to assist them. Advise them accordingly. Your solution should follow the IRAC Principle is an acronym which depicts,…arrow_forwardApfel manufactures smartphones in the United States and sells them nationwide. Apfel contracts with Big Box to make it the exclusive distributor of Apfel smartphones in California. In the contract, Apfel specifies that it would not sell its smartphones to any other retailer within a 20o-mile radius of a Big Box store. In its California stores, Big Box has a unique pricing policy. It charges a higher price to its business customers, while giving its non-business customers a 10 percent discount off the list price. Circle Store, a rival of Big Box, asked Apfel to allow it to sell Apfel phones in California. Apfel refuses because of its contract with Big Box. Apfels's distribution policy in New York differs from that in California. In New York, Apfel does not reject any distributor's request to sell Apfel smartphones. However, Apfel requires that New York distributors sign a contract agreeing not to sell Apfel products below the prices specified by Apfel in a monthly "price list." In…arrow_forward
- For the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Lilcorp manufactures budget speaker systems for Bigcorp. It arranges an agreement wherein Bigcorp may not charge more than $300 for a speaker system. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forwardA letter of credit is issued in favor of the importer;True or Falsearrow_forwardOn a beautiful Saturday in October, Francie decides to take the twenty-mile ride from her home in New Jersey into New York City to do some shopping. Francie finds that Brown’s Retail Sales, Inc., has a terrific sale on televisions and decides to surprise her husband with a new high-definition television. She purchases the set from Brown’s on her VISA card for $1,450. When the set is delivered, Francie discovers that it does not work. Brown’s refuses to repair or replace it or to credit Francie’s account. Francie therefore refuses to pay VISA for the television. VISA brings a suit against Francie. Will VISA prevail? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education