EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337516051
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 4BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary : A law enacted by the government of Puerto Rico required warning labels to be placed on cement bags. The sale of cement without labels was restricted within the territory of Puerto Rico. The law prohibited the use of cement manufactured outside Puerto Rico in any government-financed projects, as the warning label was not present on the said cement bags. ACC, a firm in Puerto Rico, filed a case against the law challenging it on the ground that it violated the dormant commerce clause.
To find : Possibility of the violation of dormant commerce clause by the Puerto Rican law.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
the major federal legislation in Canada that defines illegal practices, including price fixing, bid rigging, price discrimination, predatory pricing, double ticketing, resale price maintenance, bait and switch selling, and pyramid selling occurs when false or deceptive comparisons or distorted claims are made concerning a competitor's product, services, or property comprise principle and standards that guide behaviour in the world of business may be incurred when an unfair and untrue statement is made about a competitor in writing the statement becomes actionable when it is communicated to a third party and can be interpreted as damaging the company the foundation for partnering-style relationship, product, customer, and presentation strategies an attempt to influence the person receiving the "gift"prohibits joining a competing firm for a year after they leave mutual exchange of benefits, as when a firm buys products from its customer the buyer wants to do business with an institution…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) files suit against Yange Corp. under § 2 of the Sherman Act. To be successful,
the FTC must prove that Yange Corp. possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and that the monopoly
power was obtained by illegal means. The FTC has no direct evidence that Yange is using its power to control prices
and restrict output. The FTC, therefore, must show that Yange Corp. has monopoly power indirectly, by showing that
Yange Corp. has a dominant share of the relevant market and that there are significant barriers for new competitors
entering that market. The FTC can calculate the market share that Yange Corp. has by:
showing the total sales that Yange Corp. has ever had.
×
showing the net revenue that Yange Corp. had during their year of highest profits.
looking at the company's sales compared against the total sales of the industry within a specific
period.
taking the total sales of the industry over one year, and comparing against industry sales over prior…
Brian Cleary and Rita Burke filed a suit against cigarette maker Philip Morris USA, Inc., seeking class-action status for a claim of deceptive advertising. Cleary and Burke claimed that “light” cigarettes, such as Marlboro Lights, were advertised as safer than regular cigarettes, even though the health effects are the same. They contended that the tobacco companies concealed the true nature of light cigarettes. Philip Morris correctly claimed that it was authorized by the government to advertise cigarettes, including light cigarettes.
Assuming that is true, should the plaintiffs still be able to bring a deceptive advertising claim against the tobacco company? Why or why not?
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Business law discussarrow_forwardWisconsin passes a state law that bans all semi-trucks from carrying double-trailers on roads in our state (see picture below). The state's ostensible reason for passing the law is to reduce accidents on the road. Double-trailers a more likely to be involved in accidents than single-trailer semis. A national trade group representing freight companies sues the state, arguing that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. Would the state law violate the Dormant Commerce Clause? Explain your decision.arrow_forwardSuture Express was a new upstart specializing in the medical supply network by selling only sutures. Owens & Minor was a medical supply distributor that carried all types of medical supplies, including sutures. Owens & Minor began bundling provisions that required its customers to pay a premium for all medical products unless the customer agreed to purchase its sutures. Suture Express brought suit alleging a loss to Owens & Minor through anticompetitive practices. Is this a tying situation that violates federal antitrust laws? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. §§ 4301-06, exempts certain joint research, development and production activities from the per se rule of antitrust liability, and from the automatic award of attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who successfully challenges such activities under the antitrust laws. For parties that notify the antitrust agencies of their intent to engage in such activities, it also requires “detrebling” – successful antitrust plaintiffs are entitled only to single damages. Do you support this legislation? Why or why not? Would you support extending these same protections to all competitive conduct that is subject to the US antitrust laws? Which categories of conduct would you include or exclude from such protection? Explain your reasoning.arrow_forwardExplain how the Commerce Clause is the basis for the federal government’s authority to enact some criminal laws. Discuss two Supreme Court cases that addressed the federal government’s powers under the Commerce Clause to make a particular action a federal offense.arrow_forwardThe Commerce Clause. Regency Transportation, Inc., operates a freight business throughout the eastern United States. Regency maintains its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, and a maintenance facility and terminal location for repairing and storing vehicles in Massachusetts. All of the vehicles in Regency’s fleet were bought in other states. Massachusetts imposes a use tax on all taxpayers subject to its jurisdiction, including those that do business in interstate commerce, as Regency does. When Massachusetts imposed the tax on the purchase price of each tractor and trailer in Regency’s fleet, the trucking firm challenged the assessment as discriminatory under the commerce clause. What is the chief consideration under the commerce clause when a state law affects interstate commerce? Is Massachusetts’s use tax valid? Explainarrow_forward
- Under the Environmental Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), a designated federal agency sets fuel economy standards for new cars. The plaintiffs argued, among other things, that the EPCA, which explicitly prohibits states from adopting separate fuel economy standards, preempts states from adopting their own emission standards. Is the plaintiffs’ argument valid? Discuss.arrow_forwardExplain how the Commerce Clause is the basis for the federal government’s authority to enact some criminal laws. Discuss a Supreme Court case that addressed the federal government’s powers under the Commerce Clause to make a particular action a federal offense.arrow_forwardThe Endangered Species Act (ESA) charges the National Marine Fisheries Service (a federal agency) with the duty to “ensure” that any proposed action by the council does not “jeopardize” any threatened or endangered species. The Steller sea lion is on the list of endangered species. The agency developed a North Pacific marine fishery plan that permitted a significant harvest of fish by commercial fisheries in the area. Greenpeace, an environmental group, challenged the agency on the grounds that the plan was not based on a sufficient number of biological studies on the impact of the allowed fishing on the Steller sea lion. Greenpeace’s biologic opinion concluded that the fishery plan would reduce the level of food for the sea lions by about 40% to 60% if the juvenile fish were not counted in that figure. Greenpeace’s expert maintained that counting juvenile fish was misleading because they were not capable of reproducing and the government agency’s figure was, as a result, much lower at…arrow_forward
- An American citizen is doing business in Egypt when Egypt passes a law that American citizens cannot do business in Egypt. The United States will O a. sue Egypt on behalf of its citizen because other countries cannot interfere with a person's right to do business. not sue Egypt on behalf of its citizen because other countries can interfere with a person's right to do business. b. O c. sue Egypt on behalf of its citizen because other countries cannot interfere with the constitutional rights of an American citizen. d. not sue Egypt on behalf of its citizen because only individuals, not nations, may proceed with lawsuits.arrow_forwardIntel made large loyalty payments to HP in exchange for HP buying most of their chips from Intel instead of rival AMD. AMD sued Intel under the antitrust laws, and Intel settled the case by paying $1.25 billion to AMD What incentive conflict was being controlled by these loyalty payments? What advice did Intel ignore when they adopted this practice (consider how the Robinson-Patman Act applies to their practice) and speculate why Intel ignored the advice.arrow_forwardFor the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Lilcorp manufactures budget speaker systems for Bigcorp. It arranges an agreement wherein Bigcorp may not charge more than $300 for a speaker system. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education